Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Cicatelli Associates Inc

Enhancing the quality of health care and social services delivered to communities in need across the united states and abroad.

$3.7M
Granted FY2018
64
Grants FY2018
31
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2018.

Health$6.3M
02FY2018 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • $10k–50k22 grants · $661k
  • $50k–250k42 grants · $3.1M
$63,000
Median grant
31
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA OF NORTH ORANGE COUNTY$120,000
YWCA OF BINGHAMTON AND BROOME COUNTY$103,500
YWCA OF NORTHERN RHODE ISLAND$97,500
PROJECT RENEWAL INC$90,000
ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC & SOCIAL SERVICES ACCESS$90,000
YWCA OF MALDEN$88,500
FANNIE LOU HAMER CANCER FOUNDATION$82,500
YWCA OF GREATER LAFAYETTE$82,500
NUEVA VIDA INC$82,500
ASIAN AMERICAN HEALTH COALITION OF THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA$82,500
SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION$82,500
CHERRY STREET SERVICES INC$82,500
LA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC$80,000
JULIE ROGERS GIFT OF LIFE FREE MAMMOGRAM PROGRAM$80,000
ALLIANCE COMMUNITY SERVICES$80,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YWCA OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUETTS: $75k → 11%YWCA OF NORTH ORANGE COUNTY: $120k → 10%YWCA OF SAN ANTONIO: $63k → 16%LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC: $68k → 16%ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC & SOCIAL SERVICES ACCESS: $90k → 21%ALLIANCE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $80k → 8%YWCA OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $83k → 19%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $16k → 16%YWCA OF TOLEDONW OHIO: $50k → 18%ST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CENTER: $45k → 16%YWCA OF GREATER BATON ROUGE: $18k → 19%YWCA OF ST JOSEPH: $53k → 11%YWCA OF NORTH ORANGE COUNTY: $13k → 10%YWCA OF SAN ANTONIO: $13k → 16%LIFECARE ALLIANCE: $48k → 16%ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC & SOCIAL SERVICES ACCESS: $65k → 21%ALLIANCE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $80k → 8%YWCA OF GREATER MIAMI DADE INC: $20k → 19%YWCA OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $26k → 18%SAINT MICHAELS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $30k → 16%YWCA OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUETTS: $11k → 11%KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC: $42k → 17%LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC: $41k → 16%YWCA OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $15k → 19%YWCA OF NW OHIO: $13k → 18%SAINT MICHAELS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $25k → 16%YWCA OF ST JOSEPH: $10k → 11%KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC: $16k → 17%LIFECARE ALLIANCE: $40k → 16%YWCA OF GREATER MIAMI DADE INC: $15k → 19%YWCA OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $13k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
DE
AZ
KS
AR
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.9M · 46 repeat orgs$267k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
8

Total granted

$5.9M
$267k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+68%

Still filing today

91%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SOUTHERN ILLINOIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $260k · revenue +32%
  • LC
    LA CLINICA TEPEYAC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $206k · revenue +286%
  • LC
    LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $197k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CH
    CATHERINES HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $55k · revenue +581%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR ANNIE JEFFREYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +54% · 44% of their budget
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICES OF COFFEE COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +243%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
2
Community Clinic of Maui Inc

To provide culturally sensitive, coordinated primary care services emphasizing education, prevention, and advocacy, regardless of one's ability to pay.

Health
3
The Asian Americans for Community Involvement of Santa Clara County Inc

To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.

Health
4
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
5
Newark Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…

Health
6
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
7
Los Angeles Christian Health Centers

The mission of los angeles christian health centers is to follow christ by loving and serving our neighbors through the provision of comprehensive quality healthcare. our vision is the healing and restoration of homeless and underserved…

Health
8
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
9
Women's Community Clinic

The mission of the women's community clinic is to improve the health and well-being of women and girls. we believe preventive, educational care is essential to lifelong health and that all women deserve excellent health care, regardless of…

—
10
Westside Family Health Center

Westside Family Health Center provides comprehensive, high quality, cost effective health care in an educational and supportive environment that empowers patients to take an assertive role in caring for their well-being through all stages…

Health
11
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
12
Community Healthcare Network

Chn provides a broad range of health services including but not limited to primary and preventative care, and mental health services to a largely medically underserved population.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian American Health Coalition of the Greater Houston Area and the most unlike its peers is Alliance Community Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Asian American Advocacy & H…Child and Family ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%41%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/55
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,510

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/52
Grantees still filing
38/52
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUTHERN ILLINOIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $259,500 · HealthSOUTHERN ILLINOIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONCANCER CONSORTIUM OF EL PASO — $221,800 · HealthCANCER CONSORTIUM OF EL PASOLA CLINICA TEPEYAC — $205,580 · HealthLA CLINICA TEPEYACMARTIN LUTHER KING HEALTH CENTER DBA MLK HEALTH CENTER & PHARMACY — $185,500 · HealthMARTIN LUTHER KING HEALTH CENTER DBA MLK HEALTH CEN…Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program — $165,000 · HealthJulie Rogers Gift of Life ProgramBREAST CARE FOR WASHINGTON — $147,500 · HealthTucson Medical Center — $146,500 · HealthMorton Plant Mease Health Care Inc — $144,500 · HealthASIAN AMERICAN HEALTH COALITION OF THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA — $142,500 · HealthCherry Street Services Inc — $135,000 · HealthCHENANGO HEALTH NETWORK INC — $124,000 · HealthPROJECT RENEWAL INC — $120,500 · HealthCHARLES B WANG COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $117,500 · HealthTHE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION — $115,300 · HealthNUEVA VIDA INC — $115,250 · HealthSouthcentral Foundation — $108,000 · HealthRURAL HEALTH GROUP INC — $97,500 · HealthVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC — $97,500 · Health+4 more — $212,500 · Health+4 moreCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $246,500 · OtherCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM INCCenter for Pan Asian Community Services — $226,690 · OtherCenter for Pan Asian Community Ser…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BINGHAMTON AND BROOME COUNTY — $138,500 · OtherYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION…UNITED METHODIST WESTERN KANSAS MEXICAN- AMERICAN MINISTRIES INC — $127,688 · OtherUNITED METHODIST WESTERN KANSAS ME…ARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC — $120,000 · OtherARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INCENCORE FOR WOMENS HEALTH — $112,500 · OtherENCORE FOR WOMENS HEALTHYWCA OF NORTHERN RHODE ISLAND — $110,500 · OtherYWCA OF NORTHERN RHODE ISLANDWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC — $102,310 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INCYWCA OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $101,650 · OtherYWCA OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS…YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION BANGOR — $93,365 · OtherTHE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC — $85,500 · OtherYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK — $83,750 · OtherSAMARITAN HOUSE — $75,000 · OtherThe Witness Project of Connecticut Inc — $74,500 · OtherCENTER FOR MULTICUTURAL HEALTH — $70,500 · Other+3 more — $125,281 · Other+3 moreLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC — $196,500 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOP…ALLIANCE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $160,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE COMMUNITY SERVI…ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S — $155,000 · Human ServicesARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FO…YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MALDEN — $147,885 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN …YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH ORANGE COUNTY — $133,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN A…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE — $132,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN A…YWCA OF NORTHWEST OHIO — $100,500 · Human ServicesYWCA OF NORTHWEST OHIONORTHWEST NEW JERSEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST NEW JERSEY COM…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO — $75,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN A…KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC — $57,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF COFFEE COUNTY — $50,000 · Human Services+2 more — $33,500 · Human ServicesFANNIE LOU HAMER CANCER FOUNDATION — $132,500 · EducationXilin Northwest Chinese School — $65,000 · Education
Health$2,861,430Other$1,894,234Human Services$1,341,885Education$197,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHERN ILLINOIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $259,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $246,500 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetCenter for Pan Asian Community Services — $226,690 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCANCER CONSORTIUM OF EL PASO — $221,800 over 2y, 14% of budgetLA CLINICA TEPEYAC — $205,580 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMARTIN LUTHER KING HEALTH CENTER DBA MLK HEALTH CENTER & PHARMACY — $185,500 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program — $165,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S — $155,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MALDEN — $147,885 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetBREAST CARE FOR WASHINGTON — $147,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetTucson Medical Center — $146,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMorton Plant Mease Health Care Inc — $144,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN HEALTH COALITION OF THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA — $142,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BINGHAMTON AND BROOME COUNTY — $138,500 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetCherry Street Services Inc — $135,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH ORANGE COUNTY — $133,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE — $132,500 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetFANNIE LOU HAMER CANCER FOUNDATION — $132,500 over 2y, 43% of budgetUNITED METHODIST WESTERN KANSAS MEXICAN- AMERICAN MINISTRIES INC — $127,688 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCHENANGO HEALTH NETWORK INC — $124,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetPROJECT RENEWAL INC — $120,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC — $120,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCHARLES B WANG COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $117,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION — $115,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNUEVA VIDA INC — $115,250 over 2y, 17% of budgetSouthcentral Foundation — $108,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC — $102,310 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYWCA OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $101,650 over 2y, 11% of budgetYWCA OF NORTHWEST OHIO — $100,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNORTHWEST NEW JERSEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRURAL HEALTH GROUP INC — $97,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC — $97,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAKFAST CLUB INC — $94,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetTHE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC — $85,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK — $83,750 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO — $75,500 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE — $75,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Witness Project of Connecticut Inc — $74,500 over 2y, 63% of budgetCENTER FOR MULTICUTURAL HEALTH — $70,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetXilin Northwest Chinese School — $65,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetVIETNAMESE RESETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC — $60,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC — $57,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCATHERINES HEALTH CENTER — $55,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ANNIE JEFFREY — $50,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF COFFEE COUNTY — $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetSAINT MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CENTER INC — $34,491 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIP HEALTH CENTER INC — $30,790 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA OF GREATER BATON ROUGE — $17,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefYWCA USA IncAmericares Foundation…Prevent Cancer Founda…The Susan G Komen Bre…Reach Out and Read IncHeart to Heart Intern…American Heart Associ…Delta Dental Communit…Greater Washington Co…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Good360
Direct ReliefCA30.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · YWCA USA Inc · Americares Foundation Inc · Prevent Cancer Foundation aka Cancer Research & Prevention Fndn · The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · Heart to Heart International Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Good360

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cicatelli Associates Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Christiana Care Health System Inc — 43% of income from government
  • Northwest New Jersey Community Action Program Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Ywca of Southeastern Massachusetts Inc — 28% of income from government
  • The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Morton Plant Mease Health Care Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines