How much did CICATELLI ASSOCIATES INC grant in FY2018?

CICATELLI ASSOCIATES INC reported 64 grants totaling $3,741,540 in its FY2018 IRS filing.

Where is CICATELLI ASSOCIATES INC based?

CICATELLI ASSOCIATES INC is based in NY.

CICATELLI ASSOCIATES INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

CICATELLI ASSOCIATES INC

Enhancing the quality of healthcare and social services delivered to communities in need.

$3.7M

Granted FY2018

Grants

Communities

$120k

Largest

01What you fund

01FY2018 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

$10k–50k22 grants · $661k
$50k–250k42 grants · $3.1M

$63,000

Median grant

States reached

$17M

Total assets

Largest grants

YWCA OF NORTH ORANGE COUNTY$120,000
YWCA OF BINGHAMTON AND BROOME COUNTY$103,500
YWCA OF NORTHERN RHODE ISLAND$97,500
ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC & SOCIAL SERVICES ACCESS$90,000
PROJECT RENEWAL INC$90,000
YWCA OF MALDEN$88,500
SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION$82,500
ASIAN AMERICAN HEALTH COALITION OF THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA$82,500
FANNIE LOU HAMER CANCER FOUNDATION$82,500
NUEVA VIDA INC$82,500
YWCA OF GREATER LAFAYETTE$82,500
CHERRY STREET SERVICES INC$82,500
JULIE ROGERS GIFT OF LIFE FREE MAMMOGRAM PROGRAM$80,000
LA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC$80,000
WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC$80,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $859k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Universal Community Health Center

The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communities and a patient centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.

Health

Tri-Cities Community Health

Deliver the highest quality health care to every person, every time.

—

East Texas Community Clinic Inc

Provides access to high quality primary care to any resident in east texas.

—

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—

Northwest Community Health Care

The organization is a federally qualified health center that provides primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related patient support services to more than 18,000 individuals regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health

Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health

Westside Family Health Center

Westside Family Health Center provides comprehensive, high quality, cost effective health care in an educational and supportive environment that empowers patients to take an assertive role in caring for their well-being through all stages…

Health

Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health

Community Medical Center

Hospital serving ocean county and is committed to enhancing the overall health status of the community by providing the highest quality healthcare and related services.

Health

Community Medical Center

Strive to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health services through equitable, innovative, and inclusive care models that support patient care, education, research, & community service.

Health

Your Health Clinic

Empowering north texans to optimize health through outreach, education, prevention, evidence-based interventions, integration, and quality measurement.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charles B Wang Community Health Center and the most unlike its peers is La Clinica Tepeyac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/47

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,518

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

44 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

43/44

Grantees still filing

34/44

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$1,637,600Other$1,117,055Human Services$859,385Education$127,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefCA28.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · YWCA USA Inc · Americares Foundation Inc · The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc · Heart to Heart International · Community Catalyst Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Chicago Community Trust · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CICATELLI ASSOCIATES INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WITNESS PROJECT OF CONNECTICUT INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 010668736 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WITNESS PROJECT OF CONNECTICUT INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 63% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Cicatelli Associates Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cicatelli Associates Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CICATELLI ASSOCIATES INC

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

44 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cicatelli Associates Inc?

More from the funding graph

CICATELLI ASSOCIATES INC

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

44 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cicatelli Associates Inc?

More from the funding graph