Skip to content
Charles M and Mary D Grant Fdn Xxxxx0004 at a glance

· Private foundation

Charles M and Mary D Grant Fdn Xxxxx0004

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$381k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$640kCommunity Improvement$500kCrime & Legal$405kHealth$215kEducation$130kEmployment$90kHousing & Shelter$80kPhilanthropy$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $276k
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUCKS UNLIMITED INC$70,810
SOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW$55,500
MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION FOR$50,000
WORLD SAVVY INC$50,000
ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP$50,000
APPALACHIAN COMMUNITY CAPITAL$40,000
CENTER FOR NONPROFIT$40,000
PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP OF ATLANTA$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NATURAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT FUND: $40k → 9%TOGETHER WE BAKE: $25k → 9%TOGETHER WE BAKE: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OH
CA
KY
WV
VA
MD
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 19 repeat orgs$541k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
14

Total granted

$1.7M
$445k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+15%

Still filing today

68%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    RURAL ACTION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $160k · revenue +197%
  • WS
    World Savvy
    2× · 2024–2025 · $105k · revenue +50%
  • DU
    Ducks Unlimited Inc
    2× · 2021–2025 · $96k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • IA
    INVEST APPALACHIA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +15%
  • AD
    ACC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • GC
    Georgia Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Legal Aid Justice Center

The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.

Crime & Legal
2
Appalachian Citizens Law Center Inc

ACLC is a nonprofit law firm that engages in strategic litigation and policy work in the areas of mine safely and health, environmental protection, legacy costs of extractive industries on the people, land and economy of the Central…

Crime & Legal
3
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
4
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
5
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
6
Kentucky Center for Economic Policy Inc

To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.

Public Benefit
7
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
8
Atlanta Committee for Progress Inc

ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…

—
9
Community Justice Project

To provide high quality civil legal assistance and other services to indigent individuals and families.

Crime & Legal
10
Asian Americans Advancing Justice Atlanta Inc

Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…

Human Services
11
Arkansas Public Policy Panel Inc

Ar public policy panel is a statewide organization dedicated to achieving social and economic justice by organizing citizen groups around the state, educating and supporting them to be more effective and powerful, and linking them with one…

Environment
12
Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project

To help local farms thrive, link farmers to markets and supporters, and build healthy communities through connections to local food.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Appalachian Community Capital Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Kentucky Youth Advocates Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Children's Health Fund: $160,000 · OtherThe Children's Health FundCENTER FOR NONPROFIT: $130,000 · OtherCENTER FOR NONPROFITAMERICAN RIVERS: $120,000 · OtherAMERICAN RIVERSMOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION FOR: $115,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION FORUNITED WAY OF GREATER: $60,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATERSOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW: $55,500 · OtherSOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAWR AND H RECYCLING CORPORATION: $54,000 · OtherR AND H RECYCLING CORPORATIONACC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherGeorgia Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc: $40,000 · OtherFARM WORKERS ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · Other+7 more: $185,000 · Other+7 moreENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $100,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL WORK…Ducks Unlimited Inc: $95,810 · EnvironmentDucks Unlimited In…INVEST APPALACHIA INC: $60,000 · EnvironmentINVEST APPALACHIA …APPALACHIAN VOICES: $60,000 · EnvironmentAPPALACHIAN VOICESSUSTAINABILITY MATTERS INC: $40,000 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABILITY MAT…LOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $105,000 · Crime & LegalLOUISIANA CENTER…PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP OF ATLANTA INC: $75,000 · Crime & LegalPRO BONO PARTNER…PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $60,000 · Crime & LegalPISGAH LEGAL SER…PUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC: $40,000 · Crime & LegalPUBLIC JUSTICE C…ZEROV INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalZEROV INCINNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS: $15,000 · Crime & LegalRURAL ACTION INC: $160,000 · Community ImprovementRURAL ACTION I…ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $80,000 · Community ImprovementENTERPRISE COM…APPALACHIAN COMMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION: $40,000 · Community ImprovementAPPALACHIAN CO…World Savvy: $105,000 · InternationalTogether We Bake: $50,000 · Human ServicesPARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesKENTUCKY YOUTH ADVOCATES INC: $60,200 · Civil Rights
Other$999,500Environment$355,810Crime & Legal$320,000Community Improvement$280,000International$105,000Human Services$90,000Civil Rights$60,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRURAL ACTION INC: $160,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetThe Children's Health Fund: $160,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWorld Savvy: $105,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetLOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $105,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $95,810 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP OF ATLANTA INC: $75,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetKENTUCKY YOUTH ADVOCATES INC: $60,200 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetINVEST APPALACHIA INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAPPALACHIAN VOICES: $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTogether We Bake: $50,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetGeorgia Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSUSTAINABILITY MATTERS INC: $40,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetPARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC: $40,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGEORGIA HEALTHY FAMILY ALLIANCE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetZEROV INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunities in Schools of Georgia: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKENTUCKY COALITION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE FOR APPALACHIA INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOUNDATION IN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rockefeller Philanthr…Annie E Casey Foundat…Truist Foundation IncTides FoundationNew Venture FundMountain Association …Cassiopeia Foundation…Tr Uw Charles I BrananAmalgamated Charitabl…The Community Foundat…The Robert Wood Johns…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors IncNY15.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · Mountain Association for Community Economic Development Inc · Cassiopeia Foundation Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles M and Mary D Grant Fdn Xxxxx0004 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles M and Mary D Grant Fdn Xxxxx0004. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Public Justice Center Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles M and Mary D Grant Fdn Xxxxx0004’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home