Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Carroll Petrie Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14M
Granted FY2024still arriving
115
Grants FY2024still arriving
18
States reached
$3.9M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.

Animals$36MPhilanthropy$13MEnvironment$11MFood & Nutrition$3.8MHealth$2.8MArts & Culture$1.6MCivil Rights$1.2MEducation$1.2MCrime & Legal$665kOther$16M
02FY2024 · 115 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k45 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k51 grants · $5.0M
  • $250k+12 grants · $8.2M
$50,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$321M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM$3,862,500
THE WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT INC$1,000,000
XERCES SOCIETY INC$450,000
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY$400,000
THE BUCKEYE INSTITUTE$400,000
TROUT UNLIMITED INC$350,000
DARKSKY$350,000
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE$300,000
1792 EXCHANGE INC$300,000
PHYSICIANS COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIBLE MEDICINE$250,000
FREE THE PEOPLE FOUNDATION$250,000
NEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE$250,000
WILD EARTH SOCIETY INCORPORATED DBA WILDLANDS NETWORK$230,000
CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY$200,000
PEOPLE UNITED FOR PRIVACY FOUNDATION$200,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Covenant Pathways: $40k → 32%The Miracle League of the Triangle: $5k → 8%Covenant Pathways: $25k → 32%Compassion in World Farming: $50k → 17%The Food Depot: $15k → 12%Tewa Women United: $10k → 12%Tewa Women United: $10k → 12%Tewa Women United: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
NY
OR
WY
OH
PA
RI
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of Carroll Petrie Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 30% of the giving stays in NM; read by stated purpose it is 49% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Carroll Petrie Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$65M · 144 repeat orgs$7.3M to everyone else

144 repeat relationships — 95 still active in FY2024, 49 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

144
70

Total granted

$65M
$6.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+33%

Still filing today

82%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $477k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentEducationHealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • XS
    XERCES SOCIETY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +87%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +103%
  • DO
    Defenders of Wildlife
    6× · 2019–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $600k
  • AP
    Animal Protection New Mexico Founda
    one grant, 2019 · $500k
  • FW
    Food Water Watch
    one grant, 2020 · $450k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southwest Environmental Center

To promote and protect Wildlife

—
2
Environmental and Animal Defense

At Environmental and Animal Defense, our mission is to provide Colorado with access to affordable legal services for environmental and animal issues, in addition to protecting wildlife and their habitats through enforcement of the law. No…

Crime & Legal
3
Predator Defense

Protecting vital native predators & ending war on wildlife.

Animals
4
American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign

The american wild horse campaign is the nation's leading conservation organization dedicated to preserving the freedom and habitat of wild horses and burros. through its initiatives in advocacy, conservation, land preservation, and legal…

Animals
5
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
6
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
7
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
8
San Juan Citizens Alliance

The San Juan Citizens Alliance advocates for clean air, pure water, and healthy lands - the foundations of resilient communities, ecosystems and economies in the San Juan Basin.

Environment
9
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
10
Northern Jaguar Project

The mission of the northern jaguar project is to preserve and recover the world's northermost population of the jaguar, its unique natural habitat, and native wildlife under its protection as a flagship, keystone, and umbrella species.

Animals
11
Nevada Wild Horses

Wild horse protection, preservation, rescue and care work.

Animals
12
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Wilderness Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Holistic Manangement International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyEquine Therapy ProgramsLocal Food System Organizat…Community FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Cancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesPregnancy Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%1/183
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,382

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

176 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 176 of the 236 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

21
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
45
Early backer (in before they grew)
176/176
Grantees still filing
118/176
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

XERCES SOCIETY INC — $3,900,000 · AnimalsXERCES SOCIETY INCCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $3,450,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INCDefenders of Wildlife — $3,150,000 · AnimalsDefenders of WildlifeTHE WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT INC — $3,150,000 · AnimalsTHE WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT INCANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO — $3,050,000 · AnimalsANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICOANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $2,500,000 · AnimalsANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INCHumane World for Animals Inc — $2,025,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,350,000 · AnimalsTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $1,225,000 · Animals+48 more — $11,671,000 · Animals+48 moreWILDEARTH GUARDIANS — $1,801,000 · OtherWILDEARTH GUARDIANSThe Buckeye Institute — $800,000 · OtherWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $780,000 · OtherAmigos Bravos Inc — $675,000 · Other+90 more — $14,695,000 · Other+90 moreVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $11,517,500 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITA…NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $525,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $505,000 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE — $1,525,000 · EnvironmentNEW MEXICO WI…EARTHJUSTICE — $1,250,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEBeyond Pesticides — $850,000 · EnvironmentBeyond Pestic…AMERICAN RIVERS INC — $850,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RIVE…Pesticide Action Network North America — $750,000 · EnvironmentPesticide Act…RIO GRANDE RETURN — $575,000 · EnvironmentRIO GRANDE RE…THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY — $550,000 · EnvironmentTree New Mexico Inc — $500,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE — $440,000 · EnvironmentNEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $400,000 · Environment+21 more — $2,875,000 · Environment+21 moreCenter for Food Safety — $1,750,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD & WATER WATCH — $975,000 · Food & NutritionRodale Institute — $600,000 · Food & NutritionCENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY SCIENCES INC — $350,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more — $150,000 · Food & NutritionPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med — $2,350,000 · HealthSJOGREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $255,000 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $135,000 · Health+1 more — $25,000 · HealthWild Earth Society Incorporated — $1,585,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $50,000 · Arts & Culture
Animals$35,471,000Other$18,751,000Philanthropy$12,547,500Environment$10,565,000Food & Nutrition$3,825,000Health$2,765,000Arts & Culture$1,635,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $11,517,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC — $3,900,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $3,450,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife — $3,150,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetTHE WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT INC — $3,150,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO — $3,050,000 over 5y, 66% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $2,500,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med — $2,350,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $2,025,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetWILDEARTH GUARDIANS — $1,801,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetCenter for Food Safety — $1,750,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetWild Earth Society Incorporated — $1,585,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetNEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE — $1,525,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,350,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $1,250,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $1,225,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $1,105,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD & WATER WATCH — $975,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetBeyond Pesticides — $850,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $850,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetPANTHERA CORPORATION — $825,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $805,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetThe Buckeye Institute — $800,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC — $782,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $780,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetPesticide Action Network North America — $750,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetNATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY — $750,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetAmigos Bravos Inc — $675,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetRodale Institute — $600,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetRIO GRANDE RETURN — $575,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY — $550,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budget1792 Exchange — $550,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC — $550,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC — $530,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetCOLORADO PLATEAU FOUNDATION — $525,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $525,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetTree New Mexico Inc — $500,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetWestern Resource Advocates — $500,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetFOUR CORNERS EQUINE RESCUE — $450,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetAMERICAN BROWNSTONE INSTITUTE — $450,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE — $440,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST — $405,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetPEOPLE UNITED FOR PRIVACY FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetKINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $365,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetDenkai Animal Sanctuary — $364,000 over 4y, 41% of budgetFELINES & FRIENDS NEW MEXICO — $355,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetDONA ANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $350,000 over 3y, 52% of budgetCENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY SCIENCES INC — $350,000 over 3y, 41% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds XERCES SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds THE WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Physicians Committee for Responsible Med ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILDEARTH GUARDIANS ↗
  • Who funds Center for Food Safety ↗
  • Who funds Wild Earth Society Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
  • Who funds Beyond Pesticides ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PANTHERA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds The Buckeye Institute ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Pesticide Action Network North America ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Amigos Bravos Inc ↗
  • Who funds Rodale Institute ↗
  • Who funds RIO GRANDE RETURN ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds 1792 Exchange ↗
  • Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO PLATEAU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Tree New Mexico Inc ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…Marshall L and Perrin…Albuquerque Community…S B FoundationThornburg FoundationPatagoniaorgWilburforce FoundationBest Friends Animal S…The Frost FoundationBonner Family Foundat…Corrales Friends of A…Resources Legacy Fund
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM66.4× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · S B Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Wilburforce Foundation · Best Friends Animal Society · The Frost Foundation · Bonner Family Foundation · Corrales Friends of Animals Foundation Dba Dennis Friends Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carroll Petrie Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 99%
  • Institute for Applied Ecology — 99% of income from government
  • Xerces Society Inc — 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 236 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines