· Public charity
Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund
To develop, implement and scale community solutions for advancing health, well-being and opportunity in colorado.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k33 grants · $936k
- $50k–250k38 grants · $3.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PUEBLO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $200,000 |
| ELEVATED COMMUNITY HEALTH | $200,000 |
| NORTHWEST COLORADO HEALTH | $187,500 |
| INNER CITY HEALTH CENTER | $150,000 |
| HIGH PLAINS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $150,000 |
| EVERY CHILD PEDIATRICS | $150,000 |
| LA PLATA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPAR | $125,000 |
| NORTHEAST COLORADO HEALTH DEPARTMEN | $125,000 |
| GUNNISON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALT | $125,000 |
| LARIMER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH | $125,000 |
| DELTA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH | $125,000 |
| PUEBLO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH | $125,000 |
| LA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO | $125,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PUEBLO COUN | $100,000 |
| SHERIDAN HEALTH SERVICES | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $3.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
105 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2025, 47 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $748k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBoys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County5× · 2020–2025 · $382k · revenue +162%
- PPOSADA6× · 2020–2025 · $358k · revenue +64%
Care and Share Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $355k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- CCColorado Coalition for the Homelessone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +12%
- BPBOULDER PRIDEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $140k · revenue +119%
- PCPUEBLO CITY-COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICTone grant, 2020 · $140k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Prime health advances health justice, equity, access quality and cost through innovation, collaboration, and community building.
The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…
The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.
Empowering Latino communities through leadership development, advocacy, and policy research to strengthen Colorado
Services provided in arapahoe county colorado related to early childhood education intervention issues.
Cbhc's mission is to support community resilience, guide behavioral health innovation, and enhance individual well-being throughout colorado by supporting colorado's community behavioral health safety net providers.
Healthier colorado is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to raising the voices of coloradans in the public policy process to improve the health of our state's residents. we believe that every coloradan should have a fair…
Our mission is to promote health equity in Northern New Mexico by improving quality and access to health services regardless of one's insurance status or ability to pay.
To provide culturally competent services that promote quality health for american indian and alaskan native families and individuals in the denver area.
Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.
Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Conservation Colorado Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is Prairie Cultural Commons. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
208 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 208 of the 259 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IMMUNIZE COLORADO ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County ↗
- Who funds POSADA ↗
- Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds Pueblo Cooperative Care Center ↗
- Who funds Mariposa Center for Safety ↗
- Who funds SOUL 2 SOUL SISTERS ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds EAST SIDE CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds INNER CITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds VALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds PEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds COLORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PUEBLO INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS FIRST HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CASA OF PUEBLO INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds PUEBLO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds METRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Youth Medical and Nursing ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LA RAZA SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MARILLAC CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Pueblo Rape Crisis Services Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds PUEBLO CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COBALT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VOCES UNIDAS DE LAS MONTANAS ↗
- Who funds TRAILHEAD INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds LA CLINICA TEPEYAC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Colorado Health Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation Inc · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Trust · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Trailhead Institute · Mile High United Way Inc · The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund?
Find your warmest path to Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.