· Private foundation
Carey Cox Wyatt Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $123k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION | $34,850 |
| MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA | $31,250 |
| CHARLOTTE BALLET | $25,000 |
| JOHNS ISLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $22,000 |
| DILWORTH CENTER | $10,000 |
| CHURCH OF OUR SAVIOUR | $5,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $5,000 |
| BISHOP KENNY HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| SHARE OUR SUZY LOWCOUNTRY | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DCDilworth Center for Chemical Dependency7× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +15%
- BIBARRIER ISLANDS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC3× · 2017–2023 · $15k · revenue +94%
- CCCharleston Collegiate School2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- RSRoper St Francis Foundationone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
- TLThe Link Counseling Center Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +107%
- CCCINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITALone grant, 2019 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…
Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
Mcleod physician associates ii operates as a part of the mcleod health system. the mission of mcleod health is to improve the overall health and well being of people living within south carolina and eastern north carolina by providing…
Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
The primary purpose of the h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital, inc. ("hospital") is to contribute to the prevention and cure of cancer.
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.
To operate a health care system providing medical excellence to the eastern region of south carolina and the extreme southeastern region of north carolina.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dilworth Center for Chemical Dependency ↗
- Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
- Who funds ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE BALLET ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Roper St Francis Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Link Counseling Center Inc ↗
- Who funds BARRIER ISLANDS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds Charleston Collegiate School ↗
- Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Sea Island Habitat For Humanity Inc ↗
- Who funds NAMI National ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CUREPSP INC ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds MERCY CHEFS INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF DAVIDSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HUNLEY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Pauls Family Foundation Inc · Kelly Family Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Equitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carey Cox Wyatt Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.