Skip to content

· Public charity

California Green Business Network

Led by a coalition of state and local governments, utilities, and ngos, the ca green business program achieves a shared mission of recognizing and promoting businesses that meet high sustainability standards.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$2.4MCommunity Improvement$232kEducation$45k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$301k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COUNTY OF SAN MATEO: $20k → 7%SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $68k → 8%COUNTY OF MARIN: $23k → 8%CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $45k → 9%CITY OF VENTURA: $45k → 10%SOLANO COUNTY: $20k → 10%HAYWARD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $30k → 10%HIGH SIERRA ENERGY FDTN: $83k → 10%CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $68k → 10%CITY OF CARLSBAD: $38k → 11%ECOSLO: $23k → 12%GREATER STOCKTON CHAMBER OF C: $23k → 12%CITY OF LONG BEACH: $23k → 14%COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA: $20k → 14%MODESTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $68k → 15%DONT TRASH ME DBA KERN GREEN: $24k → 18%SAN JOAQIN VALLEY CEO: $60k → 19%SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $23k → 8%COUNTY OF MARIN: $20k → 8%HIGH SIERRA ENERGY FDTN: $46k → 10%CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $23k → 10%CITY OF CARLSBAD: $30k → 11%CITY OF LONG BEACH: $23k → 14%SANTA MARIA VAL COMM FDTN: $45k → 14%MODESTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $30k → 15%SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $20k → 8%CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH: $23k → 10%HIGH SIERRA ENERGY FDTN: $23k → 10%CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20k → 10%GREATER STOCKTON CHAMBER: $68k → 12%ECOLOGY ACTION OF SANTA CRUZ: $70k → 13%CITY OF SANTA MONICA: $20k → 14%MODESTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $23k → 15%CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH: $23k → 10%HIGH SIERRA ENERGY FDTN: $20k → 10%ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATIONS: $65k → 13%CITY OF LONG BEACH: $20k → 14%SAN DIEGO GREEN BUS COUNCIL: $60k → 11%CITY OF HAWTHORNE: $45k → 14%CITY OF TORRANCE: $45k → 14%CITY OF GLENDALE: $30k → 14%CITY OF GLENDALE: $30k → 14%CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: $23k → 14%CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: $20k → 14%CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD: $30k → 14%CITY OF EL SEGUNDO: $45k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS FBO SUSTAI: $49k → 14%CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH: $23k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 33 repeat orgs$421k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
12

Total granted

$2.2M
$391k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+55%

Still filing today

18%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HIGH SIERRA ENERGY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $171k · revenue +267% · 26% of their budget
  • MC
    MODESTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $120k · revenue +29%
  • SB
    Sierra Business Council
    2× · 2020–2023 · $45k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • EA
    Ecology Action of Santa Cruzgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $70k · revenue +55%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $68k
  • EI
    ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATIONS
    one grant, 2021 · $65k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Visalia Chamber of Commerce

To stimulate economic and community development programs in the san joaquin valley.

Community Improvement
2
Greater Eureka Chamber of Commerce

To advance the economic vitality of our community by serving as a catalyst for business growth, a convener of leaders, a champion for development, and an advocate for a thriving place to work and live.

—
3
Castro Valley Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of the Castro Valley/Eden Area Chamber of Commerce is to lead the community toward sustainable economic growth, advocate for a pro-business climate for members, honor the area's historical foundations and future promise, and…

—
4
Sacramento Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Foundation

Our mission is to strengthen the regions business community by providing education, technical assistance, access to capital, procurement facilitation and workforce development training.

Community Improvement
5
The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce

The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce is a regional chamber formed in 2016 to support a diverse business community that spans nearly forty-five miles and serves the needs of nearly 500,000 visitors each year. As a business…

Community Improvement
6
West Sacramento Chamber of Commerce

To promote business in West Sacramento, CA

—
7
San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote the commercial, industrial and civic welfare of the people of San Bernardino by encouraging the production and distribution of goods and services through the creation of more jobs and by enhancing the productivity and…

—
8
Vallejo Chamber of Commerce

The purpose is to promote a healthy business environment in the city of Vallejo.

—
9
Escondido Chamber of Commerce

The Chamber is the voice for businesses in Escondido providing leadership and guidance for the local small business community.

—
10
Central Ca Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the Central California Hispanic Chamber of Commerce is to promote business from start up to fruition, utilizing the success of our diverse community and the resources of our chamber members. We provide education and…

Community Improvement
11
Rancho Cordova Chamber of Commerce

As the membership organization of business, we promote our community's economic vitality and quality of life through leadership development, advocacy, facilitation and education. The Chamber invests in our community by providing a…

Community Improvement
12
Capital Black Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the Sacramento Black chamber of commerce is to assure member businesses will benefit through services that sustain and increase their revenue. Additionally, the region will benefit through the growth of African American…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Stockton Chamber of Commerce; the most unlike its peers is Westside Community Development Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $126,286 · OtherCITY OF SAN FRANCISCOCounty of Santa Clara: $125,894 · OtherCounty of Santa ClaraMODESTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $120,000 · OtherMODESTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCECITY OF CARLSBAD LIBRARY: $90,306 · OtherCITY OF HAWTHORNE: $89,194 · OtherTORRANCE POLICE DEPARTMENT: $87,358 · OtherCITY OF VENTURA: $87,070 · OtherCONTRA COSTA CNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER: $86,874 · OtherCITY OF LONG BEACH: $81,397 · OtherCity of Irvine: $77,658 · OtherSAN DIEGO GREEN BUS COUNCIL: $75,000 · Other+28 more: $1,199,641 · Other+28 moreHIGH SIERRA ENERGY FOUNDATION: $171,090 · EnvironmentHIGH SIERR…Ecology Action of Santa Cruz: $70,000 · EnvironmentEcology Ac…SANTA MARIA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $77,052 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY VENTURES: $27,266 · Community ImprovementWestside Community Development Corp: $15,000 · Community ImprovementFresno Metro Black Chamber of Commerce: $10,000 · Community ImprovementSierra Business Council: $45,000 · Education
Other$2,246,678Environment$241,090Community Improvement$129,318Education$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIGH SIERRA ENERGY FOUNDATION: $171,090 over 4y, 26% of budgetMODESTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $120,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetSANTA MARIA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $77,052 over 3y, 34% of budgetEcology Action of Santa Cruz: $70,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSierra Business Council: $45,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHayward Chamber of Commerce: $30,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetGreater Stockton Chamber of Commerce: $29,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY VENTURES: $27,266 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetWestside Community Development Corp: $15,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetFresno Metro Black Chamber of Commerce: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIGH SIERRA ENERGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MODESTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds SANTA MARIA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ecology Action of Santa Cruz ↗
  • Who funds Sierra Business Council ↗
  • Who funds DON'T TRASH ME DBA KERN GREEN ↗
  • Who funds Hayward Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds Greater Stockton Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY VENTURES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Fire FoundationCA21.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Fire Foundation · Public Health Institute · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Foundation for California Community Colleges · California Emerging Technology Fund · California Fire Safe Council Inc · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Direct Relief · East Bay Community Foundation · California Health Foundation and Trust · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · Center for Technology and Civic Life

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization California Green Business Network funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from California Green Business Network. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to California Green Business Network?

    Find your warmest path to California Green Business Network through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on California Green Business Network’s filings →

    More from the funding graph