· Private foundation
Brighthouse Financial Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k15 grants · $423k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $385k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE CHARLOTTE REGION | $100,000 |
| CRITTENTON | $100,000 |
| CAROLINA YOUTH COALITION | $75,000 |
| HEART MATH TUTORING | $60,000 |
| FREEDOM SCHOOL PARTNERS | $50,000 |
| CHILDRENS THEATRE OF CHARLOTTE(CTC) | $40,000 |
| ARTS | $40,000 |
| DOTTIE ROSE FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| DIGI-BRIDGE | $35,000 |
| COMMON WEALTH CHARLOTTE | $25,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $25,000 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA INC 437 NORTH CAROLINA | $25,000 |
| CHARLOTTE CENTER FOR LEGAL ADVOCACY(CCLA) | $25,000 |
| ROSIES PLACE INC | $25,000 |
| BRAVEWORKS | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $515k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $348k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHabitat For Humanity Of The Charlotte Region5× · 2019–2025 · $460k · revenue +165%
- HMHeart Math Tutoring Inc5× · 2020–2025 · $280k · revenue +87%
- CYCAROLINA YOUTH COALITION3× · 2021–2025 · $175k · revenue +218%
Funded once
- CHCLT HOST 2020 INCone grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue -100%
- EIE2D Inc E2D Eliminate the Digital Divideone grant, 2024 · $140k · revenue 0%
Crisis Assistance Ministryone grant, 2020 · $110k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Charlotte works serves job-seekers and businesses by providing resources to develop a skilled workforce that meets employer needs. the organization offers job-search workshops, individual coaching, networking opportunities, and training…
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.
Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…
Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.
Cisnc's mission is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. cisnc serves as the backbone for its statewide network of 20 independent nonprofit organizations that serve local…
To advance students' economic and social mobility by improving public education.
The Nest Academy is a trauma-informed, private K-12 school in Charlotte, North Carolina with a mission to change the lives of refugee and underprivileged students to become confident, educated, and successful first generation high school…
Youthbuild pcs seeks to transform the lives of disconnected youth by offering a program, in english and spanish, that combines rigorous academic instruction with vocational training, life and employability skills- building, and community…
The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
A womens advancement center, the mission of Dress for Success is to empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and development tools to thrive in work and in life. Programs and…
Feeding Charlotte rescues surplus, freshly prepared meals to reduce food waste and feed the hungry. We believe no food should be wasted while people go hungry in our community. To make this possible, we pickup unused, excess freshly…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity of the Charlotte Region and the most unlike its peers is Dahlia Grove. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Habitat For Humanity Of The Charlotte Region ↗
- Who funds Heart Math Tutoring Inc ↗
- Who funds CLT HOST 2020 INC ↗
- Who funds CAROLINA YOUTH COALITION ↗
- Who funds Time Out Youth Inc ↗
- Who funds E2D Inc E2D Eliminate the Digital Divide ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ↗
- Who funds Right Moves for Youth Inc ↗
- Who funds Crisis Assistance Ministry ↗
- Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY FOCUS INC ↗
- Who funds Digi-Bridge ↗
- Who funds JOHNSON C SMITH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds Freedom School Partners Inc ↗
- Who funds CMS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON INC ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
- Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds The Childrens Theatre of Charlotte Inc ↗
- Who funds Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity ↗
- Who funds PARENTCHILD INC ↗
- Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds The Academy of Goal Achievers ↗
- Who funds JOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Young Black Leadership Alliance ↗
- Who funds Promising Pages Inc ↗
- Who funds Andreas H Bechtler Arts Foundation ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Ally Charitable Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Albemarle Foundation · Merancas Foundation Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · The Presbyterian Hospital · Womens Impact Fund · Champions for Education Inc · Equitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Brighthouse Financial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Family Promise of Morris County Inc — 17% of income from government
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc — 3% of income from government
- Crossroads for Kids Inc — 1% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Brighthouse Financial Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Brighthouse Financial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.