Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bernice R Shanklin Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$215k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$272kHousing & Shelter$175kEducation$159kFood & Nutrition$155kEnvironment$142kAnimals$112kHealth$99kReligion$96kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $195k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN IN CRISIS$20,000
UNION COUNTY CARE TRAIN$15,000
SHEPHERD CHURCH$15,000
EMBRACE FLORIDA KIDS$12,500
SANCTUARY COLLECTIVE$12,500
VIEQUES HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
MID OHIO FOOD COLLECTIVE$10,000
COREFI - CONCERNED RESIDENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT INC$10,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$10,000
CANCER FREEZE$10,000
SUPPORT OUR SCHOLARS (SOS)$10,000
VIEQUES HISTORICAL TRUST SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM$10,000
UNION COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
CITY HARVEST$10,000
UNION COUNTY FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $197k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OUR COMMUNITY TABLE: $4k → 10%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $3k → 14%CARE TRAIN OF UNION COUNTY: $13k → 5%SANCTUARY COLLECTIVE: $8k → 15%SANCTUARY COLLECTIVE: $6k → 15%CARE TRAIN OF UNION COUNTY: $10k → 5%SANCTUARY COLLECTIVE: $5k → 15%CHARITY WATER: $2k → 17%CARE TRAIN OF UNION COUNTY: $10k → 5%WELCOME WAREHOUSE: $5k → 15%WELCOME WAREHOUSE: $2k → 15%CHILDREN IN CRISIS: $20k → 8%CHILDREN IN CRISIS: $20k → 8%SANCTUARY COLLECTIVE: $13k → 15%CHILDREN IN CRISIS: $10k → 8%SANCTUARY COLLECTIVE: $13k → 15%CHILDREN IN CRISIS: $9k → 8%CARE TRAIN OF UNION COUNTY: $10k → 5%SANCTUARY COLLECTIVE: $12k → 15%CHILDREN IN CRISIS: $5k → 8%CARE TRAIN OF UNION COUNTY: $10k → 5%CARE TRAIN OF UNION COUNTY: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MT
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
UT
MD
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 43 repeat orgs$419k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
33

Total granted

$1.2M
$376k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+36%

Still filing today

65%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthReligionInternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Community Housing Coalition of Madison County Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $135k · revenue +962%
  • CF
    CANCER FREEZE INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $77k · revenue +111%
  • SC
    SANCTUARY COLLECTIVE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $56k · revenue +358%

Funded once

  • TI
    TIFIE IN CARE OF GULF AIR GROUP INC
    one grant, 2018 · $115k
  • T
    TIFIE
    one grant, 2017 · $105k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CRESTVIEW INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
Farm Share Inc

A.farm share, inc. (the "organization") is a non-profit organization and was incorporated under the laws of the state of florida on july 8, 1992 as a 501c3 corporation that is tax-exempt under the provision of the internal revenue code.…

Food & Nutrition
4
Freestore Foodbank Inc

Improve lives by eliminating hunger in partnership with our community.

Food & Nutrition
5
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
6
World Harvest Charities and Family Services

We nbsp;distributed nbsp;over nbsp;200 nbsp;million nbsp;pounds nbsp;of nbsp;food nbsp;through nbsp;our nbsp;food nbsp;bank nbsp;and nbsp;partnered nbsp;with nbsp;200 nbsp;local nbsp;organizations

Human Services
7
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
8
Maui Food Bank Inc

The mission of the maui food bank is to help the hungry in maui county by collecting and distributing food through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
10
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

11
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 145 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
12
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whyhunger Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cancer Freeze Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesDomestic Violence ServicesCommunity FoundationsEquine Therapy ProgramsChristian Youth CampsIndependent K-12 SchoolsCancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%42%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/53
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,512

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/48
Grantees still filing
33/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TIFIE IN CARE OF GULF AIR GROUP INC — $114,941 · OtherTIFIE IN CARE OF GULF AIR GROUP INCTIFIE — $105,000 · OtherTIFIEUNION COUNTY FOUNDATION — $80,000 · OtherUNION COUNTY FOUNDATIONVIEQUES HUMANE SOCIETY — $79,500 · OtherVIEQUES HUMANE SOCIETYVIEQUES HISTORICAL TRUST SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM — $60,000 · OtherVIEQUES HISTORICAL TRUST SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAMEMBRACE FLORIDA KIDS — $49,575 · Other+45 more — $498,072 · Other+45 moreCHILDREN IN CRISIS INC — $63,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN IN CR…CARE TRAIN OF UNION COUNTY — $62,500 · Human ServicesCARE TRAIN OF …SANCTUARY COLLECTIVE — $55,500 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY COLL…Our Community Table - Palm City Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesOur Community …+3 more — $11,750 · Human Services+3 moreCommunity Housing Coalition of Madison County Inc — $135,200 · Housing & ShelterCommunity H…CALM ORGANIZATION INC — $25,125 · Housing & ShelterCALM ORGANI…CANCER FREEZE INC — $76,500 · HealthCAMARADERIE FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · HealthPARTNERSHIP FOR EXTRAORDINARY MINDS — $5,000 · HealthPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc — $5,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATION — $4,500 · Health+2 more — $5,000 · HealthCITY HARVEST INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionFRANKLINTON FARMS — $19,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $14,528 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $13,500 · Food & NutritionGARDEN CITY HARVEST INC — $7,500 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $3,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $4,000 · Food & NutritionSUPPORT OUR SCHOLARS (SOS) — $20,000 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION ACADEMY STUDIO SCHOOL INC — $17,750 · EducationMENLO PARK ACADEMY — $15,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $24,000 · ReligionASHA MISSION SOCIETY INC — $17,000 · ReligionChristian Aid Ministries — $2,500 · Religion
Other$987,088Human Services$213,250Housing & Shelter$160,325Health$103,500Food & Nutrition$81,528Education$52,750Religion$43,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCommunity Housing Coalition of Madison County Inc — $135,200 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetCANCER FREEZE INC — $76,500 over 7y, 13% of budgetCHILDREN IN CRISIS INC — $63,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCARE TRAIN OF UNION COUNTY — $62,500 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetSANCTUARY COLLECTIVE — $55,500 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $29,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALM ORGANIZATION INC — $25,125 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $24,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUPPORT OUR SCHOLARS (SOS) — $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetOur Community Table - Palm City Inc — $20,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetPanhandle Equine Rescue Inc — $20,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLINTON FARMS — $19,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMission Love Seeds Inc — $19,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION ACADEMY STUDIO SCHOOL INC — $17,750 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetASHA MISSION SOCIETY INC — $17,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTHE VIEQUES CONSERVATION AND HISTORICAL TRUST INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMENLO PARK ACADEMY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $14,528 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMarmon Valley Ministries Inc — $11,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLIFT ORLANDO INC — $10,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARYSVILLE AREA MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFairbanks Panthers Athletic Booster — $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE PURSE — $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetIMPACT60 INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCAMARADERIE FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARDEN CITY HARVEST INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR EXTRAORDINARY MINDS — $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION — $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE ACRE FUND — $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $3,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Upcounty Hub Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Aid Ministries — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $2,470 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARM AID INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Community Housing Coalition of Madison County Inc
  • Who funds CANCER FREEZE INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC
  • Who funds CARE TRAIN OF UNION COUNTY
  • Who funds SANCTUARY COLLECTIVE
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds CALM ORGANIZATION INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds SUPPORT OUR SCHOLARS (SOS)
  • Who funds Our Community Table - Palm City Inc
  • Who funds Panhandle Equine Rescue Inc
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds FRANKLINTON FARMS
  • Who funds Mission Love Seeds Inc
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION ACADEMY STUDIO SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds ASHA MISSION SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds THE VIEQUES CONSERVATION AND HISTORICAL TRUST INC
  • Who funds MENLO PARK ACADEMY
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
  • Who funds WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Marmon Valley Ministries Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH14.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Community Foundation of Union Count · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bernice R Shanklin Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 100%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Farm Aid Inc100% of income from government
  • Manna Food Bank Inc8% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc2% of income from government
  • The Upcounty Hub Inc2% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bernice R Shanklin Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bernice R Shanklin Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph