· Private foundation
Hudson Valley Foundation for Youth Health
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 62% of HUDSON VALLEY FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH HEALTH’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k43 grants · $88k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATSKILL RECREATION CENTER | $12,000 |
| CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD | $10,000 |
| STOCKADE WORKS | $8,000 |
| VOICE THEATRE | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME OF KINGSTON | $4,825 |
| GREATER HUDSON PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD | $4,000 |
| BOUNDLESS ARTS | $3,000 |
| PLACE CORP | $3,000 |
| ASCIENZO FAMILY FOUNDATION | $2,800 |
| KITES NEST | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| RHINEBECK REFORMED CHURCH | $2,500 |
| PHOENICIA PLAYHOUSE | $2,500 |
| MOUNTAIN VALLEY LITTLE LEAGUE | $2,500 |
| RESILENT CHILD FUND | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
72 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCHILDREN'S HOME OF KINGSTON6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +36%
- TCTHE CATSKILL RECREATION CENTER INC6× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +8%
- MGMAYA GOLD FOUNDATION8× · 2018–2025 · $15k · revenue +109%
Funded once
- RRYANone grant, 2021 · $5k
- JFJewish Federation of Ulster County Incone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -20%
- FOFamily of New Paltzone grant, 2020 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A public library with locations in catskill and palenville, new york providing reference materials and various on-line services.
The Catskill Center for Conservation and Development, Inc. (the Catskill Center) is a not-for-profit organization under the non-profit laws of the State of New York. The mission of the Catskill Center is to preserve and enrich the…
To hold and manage open space property for the public's benefit and assist in the preservation and stewardship of the scenic beauty, natural communities and recreational amenities in greene county, ny and surrounding areas.
Adk is the only non-profit organization in new york state dedicated to the conservation, preservation, and responsible recreational use of the new york state forest preserve and other parks, wild lands, and waters vital to our members and…
A summer arts program for children, exhibitions, performances, literary events, and community arts in education outreach.
The Historical Society of Rockland County is a museum and educational organization dedicated to engaging diverse audiences in a dynamic dialogue about the rich historical heritage of the county.
Upstate films connects the hudson valley with transformative cinematic experiences.
Nyack Center (the organization or the center) is a not-for-profit agency located in Nyack, New York that provides space and programs for community-building, community celebration, and community services for residents of Nyack and all of…
Economic development and promotion of the hudson valley region in new york.
Sustainable hudson valley's mission is to speed up, scale up, jazz up, and leverage progress against climate change, creating communities where people and nature thrive.
The center's mission is to provide quality childcare services to the morrisville state college campus and the local community in a safe and nurturing environment which promotes the social, emotional, physical, language and cognitive…
Please see schedule o.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ps 21 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 175 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF KINGSTON ↗
- Who funds THE CATSKILL RECREATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MAYA GOLD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STOCKADE WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds WILD EARTH WILDERNESS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds VOICE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds CULTURECONNECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASCIENZO FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOODSTOCK DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HUDSON YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds HUDSON RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds CATSKILL WHEELHOUSE ↗
- Who funds HORSES FOR A CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER HUDSON PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds BOY'S AND GIRL'S CLUB OF ULSTER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds RED HOOK RESPONDS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds THE RED HOOK COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Ulster County Inc ↗
- Who funds LAND TO LEARN ↗
- Who funds Chatham Kids Club Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation · Ulster Savings Charitable Foundation · Novo Foundation · The Dyson Foundation · The Ascienzo Family Foundation · Hrbt Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · The Newcombe Foundation · The Alexander and Marjorie Hover Foundation · Kvistad Foundation · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hudson Valley Foundation for Youth Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hudson Valley Foundation for Youth Health?
Find your warmest path to Hudson Valley Foundation for Youth Health through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.