Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Av Hunter Trust Incorporated

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
117
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$209k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Human Services$6.5MCrime & Legal$2.5MYouth Development$2.0MHealth$1.5MFood & Nutrition$1.3MHousing & Shelter$1.2MEducation$908kCommunity Improvement$318kOther$0
02FY2025 · 117 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k107 grants · $2.4M
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $609k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$72M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$208,608
LA PUENTE HOME INC$85,000
RIVERSIDE EDUCATION CENTERS$80,000
MANNA$67,500
HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE$62,500
CROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE INC$55,000
HOME BUILDERS FOUNDATION$50,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST COL$45,000
GRAND COUNTY RURAL HEALTH NETWORK$45,000
A LITTLE HELP$45,000
HIGH VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC$45,000
PARTNERS$45,000
BRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION$42,500
SARA INC$42,500
ADVOCATE SAFEHOUSE PROJECT$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $4.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELP & HOPE CENTER: $28k → 3%LIFTUP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $30k → 6%RIVER CENTER OF NEW CASTLE: $30k → 8%INTEGRATED FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICE: $35k → 8%LIFE STORIES CHILD & FAMILY ADVOCAC: $43k → 9%BABY BEAR HUGS: $30k → 13%COLORADO EAST COMMUNITY ACTION AGEN: $28k → 16%LOAVES AND FISHES MINISTRIES OF FRE: $38k → 17%TRI-COUNTY FAMILY CARE CENTER: $30k → 23%HELP & HOPE CENTER: $28k → 3%LIFTUP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $30k → 6%INTEGRATED FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICE: $30k → 8%LIFE STORIES CHILD & FAMILY ADVOCAC: $38k → 9%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $63k → 11%MORGAN COUNTY FAMILY CENTER: $45k → 12%LOAVES AND FISHES MINISTRIES OF FRE: $33k → 17%TRI-COUNTY FAMILY CARE CENTER: $30k → 23%HELP & HOPE CENTER: $28k → 3%LIFTUP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $30k → 6%LIFE STORIES CHILD & FAMILY ADVOCAC: $28k → 9%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $53k → 11%HELP & HOPE CENTER: $28k → 3%LIFE STORIES CHILD & FAMILY ADVOCAC: $28k → 9%SIX POINTS EVALUATION AND TRAINING: $30k → 10%ADVOCATES OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $30k → 11%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $43k → 11%SIX POINTS EVALUATION AND TRAINING: $30k → 10%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $43k → 11%SIX POINTS EVALUATION AND TRAINING: $30k → 10%MORGAN COUNTY FAMILY CENTER: $35k → 12%COUNSELING AND EDUCATION CENTER: $30k → 11%TRI-LAKES CARES: $35k → 9%RESPITE CARE INC: $30k → 11%TRI-LAKES CARES: $30k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $30k → 9%A LITTLE HELP: $45k → 12%A LITTLE HELP: $35k → 12%A LITTLE HELP: $30k → 12%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR: $43k → 12%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR: $33k → 12%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR: $30k → 12%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR: $28k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $35k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $33k → 12%SUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER: $38k → 12%SUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER: $35k → 12%SUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER: $30k → 12%SUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER: $30k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17M · 169 repeat orgs$636k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

169 repeat relationships — 108 still active in FY2025, 61 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

169
33

Total granted

$17M
$496k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+14%

Still filing today

86%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LA PUENTE HOME INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $395k · revenue +331%
  • RE
    RIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $300k · revenue +159%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $250k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • HO
    HOMELESS OUTREACH PROVIDING ENCOURA
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • CI
    COLORADO INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENTAL PEDIATRICS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +199%
  • SA
    SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATE CENT
    one grant, 2022 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—
2
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
3
Urban Outreach Denver

Urban Outreach Denver exists to connect people to God and to a community of support by caring for both short-term and long-term needs in the areas of food, clothing, shlter, medical care, education and job preparation.

Human Services
4
Casa of Adams & Broomfield Counties

To provide volunteer advocacy and support for at-risk children and youth, empowering families to thrive.

Human Services
5
Colorado Casa Inc

Colorado CASA is a nonprofit organization that works to strengthen local CASA organizations and advocate for children in the child welfare system.

Civil Rights
6
Colorado Child Advocacy Alliance

To support the missions of child advocacy centers in colorado to help children and their families heal from abuse and neglect via training, technical assistance, collaboration and strategic partnerships.

Crime & Legal
7
Colorado River Regional Crisis Services

The mission of the board and staff of colorado river regional crisis services is to support and educate by providing help with services and protection to promote a sense of hope and healing for all that are affected by domestic and sexual…

Human Services
8
Summitstone Health Partners

SummitStone provides comprehensive behavioral health services across all care levels: 24/7 crisis services, inpatient and outpatient treatment, housing, residential care, and peer support. We partner with law enforcement, schools, and…

Health
9
Voices for Children Inc

The mission of voices for children casa is to help break the cycle of child abuse and neglect in boulder county through the use of trained casa (court appointed special advocate) volunteers. the casas provide investigation, advocacy,…

Civil Rights
10
Streets Hope

Street's Hope provides direct services to human trafficking survivors in Colorado. Services including housing assisstance, housing support and a range of behavioral health services.

Human Services
11
Denver Area Youth Services

To promote and provide a continuum of human services to youth and their families.

Human Services
12
Sunshine Home Share Colorado

Sunshine home share colorado ensures quality of life for older adults and strengthens communities through a safe home-sharing model, supportive economic empowerment, and connections to resources and services.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Castle Rock Community Inter Church Task Force and the most unlike its peers is Jackson County Council On Aging. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health & Wellness…Business Chambers and Econo…Developmental Disabilities …Colorado Grantmaking Founda…Faith-Based International M…Youth Mentoring & Academic …Industry Trade AssociationsEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Colorado Political Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%1%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr17%35%20–35yr12%31%35–55yr13%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr17%36%20–35yr12%36%35–55yr13%8%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/178
the rest of the field
13%
3,306/25,202

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

173 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 173 of the 211 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
63
Early backer (in before they grew)
173/173
Grantees still filing
122/173
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $899,542 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $511,583 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLA PUENTE HOME INC — $395,000 · Other+95 more — $6,354,745 · Other+95 moreHOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE — $250,000 · Human ServicesA KID'S PLACE — $170,000 · Human ServicesA LITTLE HELP — $170,000 · Human ServicesADVOCATE SAFEHOUSE PROJECT — $165,000 · Human Services+47 more — $4,157,500 · Human Services+47 moreSARA Inc — $185,000 · Crime & LegalLa Plata Youth Services — $182,500 · Crime & LegalCASA OF PUEBLO INC — $160,000 · Crime & LegalHEART AND HAND CENTER — $140,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CONFLICT CENTER — $120,000 · Crime & LegalPRO BONO PROJECT OF MESA COUNTY INC — $95,000 · Crime & Legal4 the Children — $70,000 · Crime & LegalCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES — $50,000 · Crime & Legal7TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHILD ADVOCACY CTR DBA THE DOLPHIN HOUSE — $40,000 · Crime & Legal+2 more — $35,000 · Crime & LegalRIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $300,000 · EducationHBA FOUNDATION DBA HOME BUILDERS FOUNDATION — $170,000 · EducationPARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY — $95,000 · EducationPhillips County Family Education Services — $90,000 · EducationCOLORADO FOUNDATION FOR CONDUCTIVE EDUCATION — $87,500 · EducationLITERACY OUTREACH — $62,500 · EducationCANON LITERACY CENTER INC — $60,000 · EducationEnglish in Action — $60,000 · EducationChildren's Literacy Center Inc — $50,000 · Education+4 more — $90,000 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO — $185,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOUR CORNERS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $132,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY — $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentSAN MIGUEL MENTORING PROGRAM — $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FREMONT COUNTY INC — $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentTRUE NORTH YOUTH PROGRAM — $67,500 · Youth Development+5 more — $105,000 · Youth DevelopmentCapitol Hill Community Services — $130,000 · Food & NutritionCOAL CREEK MEALS ON WHEELS — $105,000 · Food & NutritionSPARROW HOUSE MINISTRIES — $100,000 · Food & NutritionReach-Out Colorado Inc — $90,000 · Food & NutritionADAMS COUNTY EMERGENCY FOOD BANK — $65,000 · Food & NutritionNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS — $52,500 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF BOULDER INC — $35,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more — $42,500 · Food & NutritionGRAND COUNTY RURAL HEALTH NETWORK INC — $165,000 · HealthRIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC — $152,500 · HealthThe Medicine Horse Center — $120,000 · HealthWET MTN VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICE INC — $50,000 · HealthRECOVERY CAFE LONGMONT — $30,000 · Health+1 more — $15,000 · Health
Other$8,160,870Human Services$4,912,500Crime & Legal$1,077,500Education$1,065,000Youth Development$770,000Food & Nutrition$620,000Health$532,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLA PUENTE HOME INC — $395,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $300,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetHOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE — $250,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetCROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE INC — $237,500 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetMANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN — $200,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetMARIA DROSTE SERVICES OF COLORADO INC — $192,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY — $185,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetFULL CIRCLE OF LAKE COUNTY INC — $185,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetSARA Inc — $185,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO — $185,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetLa Plata Youth Services — $182,500 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE INC — $175,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetHIGH VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $175,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetA KID'S PLACE — $170,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetA LITTLE HELP — $170,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetHBA FOUNDATION DBA HOME BUILDERS FOUNDATION — $170,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetGRAND COUNTY RURAL HEALTH NETWORK INC — $165,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetADVOCATE SAFEHOUSE PROJECT — $165,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetSAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC — $162,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetSUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER INC — $162,500 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetCASA OF PUEBLO INC — $160,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetGREELEY TRANSITIONAL HOUSE DBA GREELEY FAMILY HOUSE — $157,500 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetLA PLATA FAMILY CENTERS COALITION — $155,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC — $155,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetRIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC — $152,500 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetPARTNER INC — $150,000 over 6y, 43% of budgetAlternative Horizons Corporation — $150,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetKARIS COMMUNITY — $150,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetCASTLE ROCK COMMUNITY INTER CHURCH TASK FORCE — $145,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetIntegrated Family Community Services — $145,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCOLORADO HOMELESS FAMILIES INC — $145,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetTRI-LAKES CARES — $140,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetHEART AND HAND CENTER — $140,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetCOLORADO EAST COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $137,500 over 6y, 10% of budgetRiver Center of New Castle Inc — $135,000 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetCENTER FOR ENRICHED COMMUNICATION — $135,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY FAMILY CENTER INC — $135,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetSIX POINTS EVALUATION AND TRAINING INC — $135,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetTRI-COUNTY FAMILY CARE CENTER INC — $135,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetPROJECT HOPE OF GUNNISON VALLEY — $135,000 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetHaven House of Montrose Inc — $135,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetFOUR CORNERS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $132,500 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetSAFE SHELTER OF ST VRAIN VALLEY — $130,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetCapitol Hill Community Services — $130,000 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetLoaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County Inc — $127,500 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetRegional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs — $125,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY — $125,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetLift Up of Routt County — $125,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LA PUENTE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds MARIA DROSTE SERVICES OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FULL CIRCLE OF LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SARA Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO ↗
  • Who funds La Plata Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds A KID'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds A LITTLE HELP ↗
  • Who funds HBA FOUNDATION DBA HOME BUILDERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAND COUNTY RURAL HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATE SAFEHOUSE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF PUEBLO INC ↗
  • Who funds GREELEY TRANSITIONAL HOUSE DBA GREELEY FAMILY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LA PLATA FAMILY CENTERS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNER INC ↗
  • Who funds Alternative Horizons Corporation ↗
  • Who funds KARIS COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds CASTLE ROCK COMMUNITY INTER CHURCH TASK FORCE ↗
  • Who funds Integrated Family Community Services ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO HOMELESS FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-LAKES CARES ↗
  • Who funds HEART AND HAND CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO EAST COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds River Center of New Castle Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ENRICHED COMMUNICATION ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN COUNTY FAMILY CENTER INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anschutz Family Found…El Pomar FoundationColorado Gives Founda…Rocky Mountain Health…The Colorado Health F…Trailhead InstituteThe Denver FoundationDaniels FundMile High United Way …Caring for Colorado F…The Edmund T & Eleano…The Colorado Trust
Anschutz Family FoundationCO234.7× affinity132 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anschutz Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Trailhead Institute · The Denver Foundation · Daniels Fund · Mile High United Way Inc · Caring for Colorado Foundation · The Edmund T & Eleanor Quick Foundation · The Colorado Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Av Hunter Trust Incorporated funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    108report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Av Hunter Trust Incorporated?

    Find your warmest path to Av Hunter Trust Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 211 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home