Skip to content
Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc

Shape national and global health outcomes by promoting the value and contributions of public health laboratories and continuously improving the public health laboratory system and practice.

$21M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$7.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$18MArts & Culture$7.8MScience & Tech$821kFood & Nutrition$363kPublic Benefit$221kEnvironment$155kPublic Safety & Disaster$64kEducation$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $10,028,632, the rows itemized in this filing. The $20,642,024 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,613,392 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $271k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $636k
  • $250k+3 grants · $9.1M
$43,093
Median grant
17
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC$7,839,040
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$878,347
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA$395,310
GENETIC ALLIANCE$219,667
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$177,951
HEALTH RESEARCH INC$109,498
ICONNECT CONSULTING CORP$78,300
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL$50,700
ARIZONA DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES$47,272
REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MN$43,093
UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO$37,967
STATE OF MICHIGAN - DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES$26,558
UTAH PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY$21,948
THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM$21,652
CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$20,143
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES: $222k → 11%MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $156k → 14%ASSOCIATION OF FOOD AND DRUG OFFICIALS: $221k → 9%ICONNECT CONSULTING CORP: $285k → 10%PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISE: $295k → 14%HEALTH RESEARCH INC: $530k → 14%SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL: $255k → 16%ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $134k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $395k → 13%IOWA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $113k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $878k → 15%WISCONSIN STATE LAB OF HYGIENE: $208k → 10%UTAH PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY: $200k → 8%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $222k → 12%NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $7.8M → 13%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $271k → 10%COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT: $247k → 12%TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $341k → 18%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL PATHOLOGY: $419k → 14%ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN FEED CONTROL OFFICIALS: $258k → 19%NJ DEPT OF HEALTH: $118k → 11%VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CONSOLIDATED LABORATORY SERVICES: $207k → 22%LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $115k → 19%STATE OF MARYLAND DOH: $125k → 19%ICONNECT CONSULTING CORP: $146k → 10%PUBLIC HLTH FOUNDATION ENT: $275k → 14%PACIFIC ISLAND HEALTH OFFICERS ASSOCIATION: $125k → 9%HEALTH RESEARCH INC: $494k → 14%SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL: $252k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $279k → 13%UTAH PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY: $126k → 8%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $178k → 12%GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $153k → 13%GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $164k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER: $177k → 10%COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT: $134k → 12%TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $106k → 18%ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN FEED CONTROL OFFICIALS: $104k → 19%VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CONSOLIDATED LABORATORY SERVICES: $149k → 22%GENETIC ALLIANCE: $220k → 8%PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $172k → 14%HEALTH RESEARCH INC: $340k → 14%SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL: $205k → 16%UTAH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $109k → 8%HEALTH RESEARCH INC: $254k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER: $179k → 12%GENETIC ALLIANCE: $185k → 8%HEALTH RESEARCH INC: $109k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Association of Public Health Laboratories Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 47 repeat orgs$9.2M to everyone else

47 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
21

Total granted

$19M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+114%

Still filing today

15%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CulturePublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HR
    HEALTH RESEARCH INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +32%
  • PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $763k · revenue +398%
  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN FEED CONTROL OFFICIALS INC C/O FASS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $363k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF FOOD AND DRUG OFFICIALSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $221k · revenue +200%
  • PI
    PACIFIC ISLAND HEALTH OFFICERS ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +114%
  • KD
    KANSAS DEPT OF HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $113k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
2
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
3
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials

To support, equip, and advocate for state and territorial health officials in their work of advancing the public's health and well-being.

Health
4
Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc

Shape national and global health outcomes by promoting the value and contributions of public health laboratories and continuously improving the public health laboratory system and practice.

—
5
Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc

Development of state surveillance and epidemiologist training

—
6
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
7
Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health Inc

Strengthening and promoting the education, research, service, and practice activities of ceph-accredited schools and programs and advocating for the investment in science needed to advance population health and for evidence-based public…

Education
8
Care Transformation Collaborative of Ri

The mission of ctc-ri is to support the continuing transformation of primary care in rhode island as the foundation of an ever-improving integrated, accessible, affordable, and equitable health care system. ctc-ri brings together critical…

Health
9
National Network of Public Health Institutes Inc

The national network of public health institutes, inc. (nnphi) is a national public health organization chartered on june 21, 2001. its mission is to support national public health system initiatives and strengthen public health institutes…

Health
10
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc

To create and lead alliances and public-private partnerships that advance breakthrough biomedical discoveries and improve the quality of people's lives

Health
11
Altarum Institute

Altarum is focused on improving the health of individuals with fewer financial resources and populations disenfranchised by the health care system. we drive impactful changes in four domains: 1) transform health service delivery - we work…

Science & Tech
12
American College of Physicians Inc

The mission of the american college of physicians (acp), www. acponline.org, is to enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine. acp was founded in 1915 to…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Health Leadership and Innovation; the most unlike its peers is Health Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STATE OF TENNESSEE: $1,200,653 · OtherSTATE OF TENNESSEEState University of Iowa: $1,162,752 · OtherState University of IowaREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $998,437 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOSOUTH CAROLINA NETWORK: $907,643 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL PATHOLOGY: $768,934 · OtherPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $763,241 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $699,499 · OtherVIRGINIA DIVISION OF CONSOLIDATED LABORATORY SERVICES: $616,087 · OtherICONNECT CONSULTING CORP: $589,885 · Other+52 more: $9,652,271 · Other+52 moreNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $7,839,040 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CEN…HEALTH RESEARCH INC: $1,846,346 · HealthHEALTH RES…GENETIC ALLIANCE INC: $404,167 · HealthGENETIC AL…PACIFIC ISLAND HEALTH OFFICERS ASSOCIATION INC: $125,490 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $87,639 · Health+2 more: $79,190 · HealthASSOCIATION OF FOOD AND DRUG OFFICIALS: $221,347 · Public BenefitEmory University: $15,000 · Education
Other$17,359,402Arts & Culture$7,839,040Health$2,542,832Public Benefit$221,347Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $7,839,040 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC: $1,846,346 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL PATHOLOGY: $768,934 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $763,241 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGENETIC ALLIANCE INC: $404,167 over 2y, 14% of budgetASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN FEED CONTROL OFFICIALS INC C/O FASS: $362,793 over 2y, 18% of budgetASSOCIATION OF FOOD AND DRUG OFFICIALS: $221,347 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetPACIFIC ISLAND HEALTH OFFICERS ASSOCIATION INC: $125,490 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $87,639 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEmory University: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HEALTH LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION: $11,455 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION: $9,190 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL PATHOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds GENETIC ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN FEED CONTROL OFFICIALS INC C/O FASS ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF FOOD AND DRUG OFFICIALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Council of State and …Association of State …Association of Matern…National Foundation f…Investor Protection T…National Fish and Wil…North American Associ…The Pew Charitable Tr…Recreational Boating …American Bar Associat…National Environmenta…Trustees of Tufts Col…
Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists IncGA55.6× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · Association of State and Territorial Health Officials · Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · Investor Protection Trust · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · North American Association of Central Cancer Registries · The Pew Charitable Trusts · Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation · American Bar Association · National Environmental Health Association · Trustees of Tufts College

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Genetic Alliance Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Association of Public Health Laboratories’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home