· Private foundation
APMPFF Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $3k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $875k
- $250k+1 grant · $330k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| University of Michigan | $330,000 |
| University of Chicago | $225,000 |
| Lurie Childrens | $130,000 |
| Boston College | $130,000 |
| Stanford University | $130,000 |
| US Olympic Committee | $100,000 |
| US Olympic & Paralympic Foundation | $60,000 |
| USATF Alaska | $50,000 |
| Telluride Foundation | $50,000 |
| Telluride Mountain Club | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| Ultimate Impact | $15,000 |
| CYUP | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $384k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.
27 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- UOUniversity of Michigan8× · 2018–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +195% · 52% of their budget
University of Chicago6× · 2020–2025 · $950k · revenue +52%
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE9× · 2017–2025 · $685k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- LBLittle Bears Playhouse Incgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +44%
- TFTRACKSMITH FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -33% · 80% of their budget
- VNVERY NICE TRACK CLUB NPOone grant, 2024 · $50k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Achieving international impact through world-class research and education in fundamental computer science and information technology.
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
Foster development of winter sports in utah and manage and maintain the utah olympic park, utah olympic oval and soldier hollow nordic center.
Education and Research
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
How this is measured
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Telluride Ski and Snowboard Club Inc ↗
- Who funds USATF Alaska Inc ↗
- Who funds Island Trails Network ↗
- Who funds GIRDWOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARMORY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO SKY CARES ↗
- Who funds KODIAK HOCKEY LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds TELLURIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Ultimate Impact Inc ↗
- Who funds Telluride Mountain Club ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Little Bears Playhouse Inc ↗
- Who funds TRACKSMITH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MATHER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds START EARLY ↗
- Who funds ALL STARS HELPING KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HIGH JUMP ↗
- Who funds Vocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leaders ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dalton Family Foundation · The Thomas Phillips and Jane Moore Johnson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization APMPFF Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from APMPFF Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to APMPFF Inc?
Find your warmest path to APMPFF Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on APMPFF’s filings →