Skip to content
Andrew M Paul Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Andrew M Paul Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.4MEducation$1.1MSocial Science$455kRecreation & Sports$349kReligion$281kHealth$229kPhilanthropy$76kYouth Development$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.4M
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$126k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JAZZ ASPEN SNOWMASS$1,400,000
THE COLORADO GRAND$25,000
TEEN CANCER AMERICA$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GRAHAM WINDAM: $20k → 20%AKOLA ACADEMY: $1k → 14%CORNELL FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION: $1k → 9%THE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%GRAHAM WYNDHAM: $1k → 20%THE COUNSELING CENTER INC: $500 → 9%DESTINATION COLLEGE: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
SD
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MD
AZ
TN
SC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Andrew M Paul Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 37% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 0%.

Andrew M Paul Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 18 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
56

Total granted

$2.8M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+29%

Still filing today

89%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS
    3× · 2018–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +71%
  • Cornell University
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +49%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $55k · revenue +231%

Funded once

  • HB
    HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $400k
  • US
    US SKI & SNOWBOARD TEAM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $182k
  • US
    United States Ski Team Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $160k · revenue +82%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
5
Brooklyn Law School

To provide students with the knowledge, skills, ethical values needed for a career in law.

Education
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Open Mind Legacy Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/49
Grantees still filing
35/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $1,417,400 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS+2 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCornell University: $1,000,500 · EducationCornell UniversityTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $70,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY+7 more: $46,750 · EducationHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $400,000 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOLUS SKI & SNOWBOARD TEAM FOUNDATION: $182,000 · OtherUS SKI & SNOWBOARD TEAM FOUNDAT…THE REFORMED CHURCH: $175,000 · OtherTHE REFORMED CHURCHBRONXVILLE REFORMED CHURCH: $76,000 · OtherBRONXVILLE REFORMED CHURCHLAWRENCE HOSPITAL: $50,000 · Other+45 more: $254,632 · Other+45 moreUnited States Ski Team Foundation: $160,000 · Recreation & SportsFAIRSPORT INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $6,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $257 · Recreation & SportsCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $75,000 · HealthAugies Quest to Cure ALS Inc: $25,000 · HealthMONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthCUREFA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthFRAXA Research Foundation Inc: $5,000 · HealthTHE FIBROLAMELLAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $55,000 · Social ScienceYOUNG LIFE: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEEN CANCER AMERICA INC: $3,000 · Youth Development
Arts & Culture$1,420,400Education$1,117,250Other$1,137,632Recreation & Sports$176,257Health$140,500Social Science$55,000Youth Development$33,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $1,417,400 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetCornell University: $1,000,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation: $160,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO GRAND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAugies Quest to Cure ALS Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGRAHAM WINDHAM: $20,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAD USA INC: $13,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetFAIRSPORT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCUREFA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FUND OF BRONXVILLE EASTCHESTER TUCKAHOE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetALLEN-CHASE FOUNDATION DBA EAGLEBROOK SCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRAXA Research Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FIBROLAMELLAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OPEN MIND LEGACY PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTEEN CANCER AMERICA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRONXVILLE POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE BRONXVILLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCORNELL FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HONOR FOUNDATION INC: $1,042 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $1,023 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILL REEF FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAKOLA ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCONCORDIA COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJBFC INC DBA MAINSPRINGSJBFC: $502 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COUNSELING CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWestchester Medical Center Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRONXVILLE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCIL: $350 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ADD IMPACT NETWORK INC: $257 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WESLEY SCHOOL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESTINATION COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Nagle Family Foun…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Marilynn and John Hil…Demartini Family Foun…Two Lights Foundation…The Ayco Charitable F…Mackesy Family Founda…Esmond Nissim Foundat…First Eagle Investmen…Tracy Flanigan McVey …George K and Cynthia …The Joan C and David …
The Nagle Family FoundationNY22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Nagle Family Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Marilynn and John Hill Foundation Inc · Demartini Family Foundation · Two Lights Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Mackesy Family Foundation · Esmond Nissim Foundation Inc Co Bosworth Gray & Fuller Esq · First Eagle Investments Foundation · Tracy Flanigan McVey Family Foundation · George K and Cynthia R Cooney Charitable Foundation · The Joan C and David L Henle Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Andrew M Paul Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Andrew M Paul Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Andrew M Paul Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Andrew M Paul Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Andrew M Paul Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home