· Private foundation
The Joan C and David L Henle Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $152,230 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $304,100 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $151,870 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Union College | $50,000 |
| Adirondack Land Trust Inc | $40,000 |
| Kravis Center for the Performing Arts | $20,000 |
| US Ski and Snowboard | $5,000 |
| Robinhood Foundation | $5,000 |
| West Palm Golf Community Trust | $5,000 |
| Project Lyme | $5,000 |
| Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History | $5,000 |
| Palm Beach Navy Seal Evening of Tribute Inc | $4,260 |
| American Federation for children | $2,500 |
| Preservation Fdn of Palm Beach Inc | $2,500 |
| Center for Educational Innovation | $2,500 |
| Kravis Center for the Performing Arts | $1,770 |
| The Lord's Place | $1,000 |
| Destination College | $1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UCUNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY3× · 2022–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +10%
- ALADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC4× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +32%
- RFRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC3× · 2022–2024 · $64k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- USUnited States Ski Team Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $85k · revenue +82%
- UCUnion Collegeone grant, 2021 · $50k
- USUNITED SPECIAL SPORTSMAN ALLIANCE Ione grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bronxville Beautification Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds WEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds United States Ski Team Foundation ↗
- Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED SPECIAL SPORTSMAN ALLIANCE I ↗
- Who funds The Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach Inc ↗
- Who funds PROJECT LYME ↗
- Who funds SUCCESS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Center for Educational Innovation Inc ↗
- Who funds DESTINATION COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY ↗
- Who funds USA Nordic Sport ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH NAVY SEAL EVENING OF TRIBUTE INC ↗
- Who funds YONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds NCGA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES NY SECOND CENTURY FUND ↗
- Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE LORD'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds GRAMATAN VILLAGE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Demartini Family Foundation · The Nagle Family Foundation · Marilynn and John Hill Foundation Inc · Tracy Flanigan McVey Family Foundation · George K and Cynthia R Cooney Charitable Foundation · Harris J and Geraldine S Nelson Foundation · Andrew M Paul Family Foundation · The New York and Presbyterian Hospital · The Lazard Charitable Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.