· Private foundation
The Nagle Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k37 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $113k
- $250k+1 grant · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY | $400,000 |
| CHRIST CHURCH BRONXVILLE | $43,000 |
| ST MARKS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $38,600 |
| ST ANNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $16,500 |
| BRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL | $15,000 |
| NITTANY LION WRESTLING CLUB | $7,500 |
| EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT | $5,000 |
| GRAMATAN VILLAGE | $4,950 |
| THE PICTURE HOUSE | $3,200 |
| Pestalozzi US Childrens Charity Inc | $3,000 |
| METROPOLITAN OPERA HOUSE | $2,750 |
| BAY STREET THEATRE | $2,500 |
| JANSEN HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE | $2,400 |
| BRONXVILLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $2,300 |
| ATLANTIC GOLF CLUB FDN | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC ASSOCIATES INC5× · 2020–2024 · $73k · revenue +100%
- GVGRAMATAN VILLAGE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +156%
- TPTHE PICTURE HOUSE REGIONAL FILM CENTER INC3× · 2022–2024 · $17k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- SWSUCCESS WITH HONORone grant, 2023 · $20k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $3k
- TNTHE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPORTUNITY NETWORKgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +136%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The new york society library was founded in 1754 by the new york society, a civic-minded group formed in the belief that the availability of books would help the city of new york to prosper.
The mission of the new york public library is to inspire lifelong learning, advance knowledge, and strengthen our communities.
Barnard college aims to provide the highest quality liberal arts education to promising and high-achieving young women, offering the unparalleled advantages of an outstanding residential college in partnership with a major research…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Frederick Gunn School Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Bronxville Derby Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds GRAMATAN VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PICTURE HOUSE REGIONAL FILM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds NITTANY LION WRESTLING CLUB ↗
- Who funds PESTALOZZI US CHILDRENS CHARITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE ATLANTIC GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ST BARTHOLOMEW'S ANGLICAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE BRONXVILLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DESTINATION COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds PENN STATE WRESTLING CLUB ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK VETERAN POLICE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPORTUNITY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRONXVILLE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Bronxville Historical Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH GARDENS YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE BRONXVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds CONCORDIA CONSERVATORY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Marilynn and John Hill Foundation Inc · Andrew M Paul Family Foundation · Tracy Flanigan McVey Family Foundation · Esmond Nissim Foundation Inc Co Bosworth Gray & Fuller Esq · Steven a and Marianne M Mills Charitable Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · George K and Cynthia R Cooney Charitable Foundation · Harris J and Geraldine S Nelson Foundation · The Joan C and David L Henle Foundation · Mackesy Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Nagle Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Nagle Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Nagle Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.