· Private foundation
Two Lights Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $118k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DIA ART FOUNDATION | $618,000 |
| CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION | $500,000 |
| WOMEN'S COACHING ALLIANCE | $57,500 |
| SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES | $25,000 |
| RADICAL HOPE INC | $25,000 |
| OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE | $24,200 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF AMERICA | $22,120 |
| REFORMED CHURCH OF BRONXVILLE | $12,000 |
| PORTLAND MUSEUM OF ART | $10,000 |
| KETCHA OUTDOORS | $3,000 |
| KAPLAN JCC ON THE PALISADES | $2,500 |
| SESAME WORKSHOP | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,300 |
| COMMUNITY FUND OF BRONXVILLE EASTCHESTER TUCKAHOE INC | $2,000 |
| YOU GOTTA BELIEVE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $221k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DCDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $4.2M · revenue +150%
- CICHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +28%
CHAUTAUQUA FOUNDATION INC2× · 2017–2018 · $800k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- MSMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERone grant, 2018 · $250k
- GGGRIDIRON GREATS ASSISTANCE FUND INCone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -29%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Spark lasting social justice change, mobilizing people, capital, & expertise for a fair brooklyn.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The foundation, a subsidiary of new york university, fosters legal education and research at new york university's school of law by awarding scholarships, making grants for educational purposes related to law, and supporting programs of…
As a new york city based nonprofit, we're dedicated to transforming the health and well-being of our communities through inclusive and accessible running experiences, empowering all to achieve their potential.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bob Woodruff Family Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Prouts Neck Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds THE DARTMOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds CHAUTAUQUA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America ↗
- Who funds NFL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds MERGING VETS AND PLAYERS ↗
- Who funds ANSWER ALS ↗
- Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds Womens Coaching Alliance ↗
- Who funds NewYork-PresbyterianLawrence Hospital ↗
- Who funds GRIDIRON GREATS ASSISTANCE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RADICAL HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR AFRICAN MEDICINE AND EDUC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER BUFFALO INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS) ↗
- Who funds TARGET ALS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHAWN CARTER SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Portland Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds WARRICK DUNN CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds We the People of Detroit ↗
- Who funds The YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
- Who funds THE LEARY FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nfl Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Andrew M Paul Family Foundation · The Nagle Family Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Marilynn and John Hill Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Two Lights Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc — 32% of income from government
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of America — 21% of income from government
- Florida Community Health Centers Inc — 17% of income from government
- Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.