· Public charity
American Legion Child Welfare Foundation
The American Legion Child Welfare Foundation provides grants to nonprofit organizations that address the physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual needs of children across the nation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $709,050 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $839,744 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $130,694 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
- $250k+1 grant · $525k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN LEGION NATIONAL HEADQUARTER | $525,000 |
| Cleveland County ALWS Inc | $125,000 |
| Boston Community Pediatrics | $50,000 |
| ASXL Rare Research Edowment Foundation | $9,050 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $292k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $184k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ALAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS4× · 2019–2023 · $346k · revenue +33%
- MMMercy Medical Angels2× · 2018–2020 · $76k · revenue +33%
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION2× · 2019–2021 · $60k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- OMOUR MILITARY KIDS INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $54k · revenue +42%
- DDUETone grant, 2023 · $51k
- BHBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +58%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
At conquering chd we exist to conquerin the most common birth defect. we engage, listen, learn, and act. we create visibility and empower all impacted by chd. we accomplish this through awareness, knowledge, community and research.
We are committed to identifying the cause, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of amniotic fluid embolism and bring our information and resources to healthcare providers and impacted families through our education and support programs.We…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) is a genetic disease that causes loss of muscle control and balance, cancer, lung disease, and immune system problems in children and young adults, shortening their lives. The nonprofit A-T Children's Project…
The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.
To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.
The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…
To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.
Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The National Children's Cancer Society and the most unlike its peers is The Eight & Forty Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The American Legion ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS ↗
- Who funds Cleveland County ALWS Baseball ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT SOARS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AUTISM ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Medical Angels ↗
- Who funds SONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED THROUGH READING ↗
- Who funds OUR MILITARY KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds ADOPTION EXCHANGE ASSOCIATION INC DBA NATIONAL ADOPTION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DEPRESSION AND BIPOLAR SUPPORT ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIFT OF ADOPTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE J A Y C FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BRAILLE PRESS INC ↗
- Who funds CORNELIA DE LANGE SYNDROME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PRINTING HOUSE FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds THE AUTISM COMMUNITY IN ACTION ↗
- Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
- Who funds FIRST CANDLE INC ↗
- Who funds CURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE GRATITUDE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds ART WITH HEART ↗
- Who funds Knowledge Point Network ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ADOPTION SUPPORT AND EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds LIFELINE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Express Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Veterans United Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Legion Child Welfare Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Adoption Support and Education Inc — 51% of income from government
- First Candle Inc — 46% of income from government
- Boston Community Pediatrics Inc — 10% of income from government
- National Braille Press Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to American Legion Child Welfare Foundation?
Find your warmest path to American Legion Child Welfare Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.