Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

American Bird Conservancy

American Bird Conservancy (ABC) takes bold action to conserve wild birds and their habitats throughout the Americas.

$6.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
64
Grants FY2024still arriving
25
States reached
$488k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Animals$16MEnvironment$583k
02FY2024 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 64 grants below total $3,597,833 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,727,399 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,129,566 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $798k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$30,739
Median grant
25
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Nature Conservancy$487,850
Worman Forest Management LLC$376,603
IUP Research Institute$281,148
Georgetown University$153,213
Conversant Solutions LLC$150,999
Gulf Coast Bird Observatory$120,579
Ocean Tech Services LLC$119,280
Rainforest Trust Inc$100,000
Glacierland Resource Conservation & Development Councile Inc$90,428
NatureServe$89,446
National Audubon Society$81,607
SHAW Solutions LLC$80,121
Forest Stewards Guild$79,994
Native Resource Preservation LLC$77,564
Jeff Powell Excavating LLC$76,945
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Ocean Tech Services LLC: $119k → 8%Worman Forest Management: $608k → 10%EARTHWORKS TECHNOLOGY INC: $102k → 11%WILDLIFE SPECIALIST LLC: $98k → 12%IUP RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $355k → 14%HALLUX ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION LLC: $103k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII: $688k → 9%BULL RUN FOREST & LAND MANAGEMENT LLC: $179k → 13%National Audubon Society: $82k → 17%Gulf Coast Bird Observatory: $121k → 10%NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION: $81k → 16%Georgetown University: $153k → 14%Glacierland Resource Conservation & Development Councile Inc: $90k → 10%Conversant Solutions LLC: $151k → 12%COLUMBIA LAND TRUST: $105k → 9%JOCOTOCO CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $105k → 14%RAINFOREST TRUST: $209k → 6%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500k → 7%JOCOTOCO CONSERVATION FOUNDATION (US): $95k → 19%Worman Forest Management LLC: $377k → 10%IUP Research Institute: $281k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII: $484k → 9%RAINFOREST TRUST INC: $176k → 6%The Nature Conservancy: $488k → 7%IUP Research Institute: $237k → 14%HALLUX ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION LLC: $102k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII: $409k → 9%RAINFOREST TRUST INC: $130k → 6%The Nature Conservancy: $109k → 7%IUP RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $217k → 14%PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION INC: $129k → 9%OIKONOS: $240k → 17%Rainforest Trust Inc: $100k → 6%NatureServe: $89k → 7%IUP RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $166k → 14%PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION INC: $119k → 9%OIKONOS: $104k → 17%IUP RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $163k → 14%PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION INC: $117k → 9%IUP RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $152k → 14%PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION INC: $108k → 9%IUP RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $141k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII: $89k → 9%STATE OF HAWAII: $416k → 9%HAWAII DEPT OF LAND & RESOURCES: $368k → 9%State of Hawaii: $336k → 9%HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES: $328k → 9%HAWAII DEPT OF LAND & RESOURCES: $84k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
AL
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $3.1M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South America$2.3M · 73% · 28 grants

Stated purpose: Bird Conservation

Central America and the Caribbean$554k · 18% · 11 grants

Stated purpose: Bird Conservation

Sub-Saharan Africa$119k · 4% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: Bird Conservation

North America (Canada and Mexico)$94k · 3% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: Bird Conservation

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$37k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Bird Conservation

East Asia and the Pacific$14k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Bird Conservation

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 53 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

53 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 42 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
55

Total granted

$13M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+26%

Still filing today

53%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentAnimalsEducationScience & TechArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    IUP RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +113%
  • RT
    RAINFOREST TRUST
    4× · 2019–2024 · $615k · revenue +78%
  • PR
    PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $570k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • BR
    BULL RUN FOREST & LAND MANAGEMENT LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $179k
  • FP
    FRED PHILLIPS CONSULTING LLC
    one grant, 2018 · $80k
  • RM
    RIVERDALE MILLS CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $77k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
4
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
5
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
6
Defenders of Wildlife

Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities.

Animals
7
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
8
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
9
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
10
Maine Audubon Society

Maine Audubon works to conserve Maine's wildlife and habitat by engaging people of all ages in education, conservation, and action. We are helping the people of Maine become the nation's most informed and effective stewards of wildlife and…

Environment
11
California Institute of Environmental Studies

The institute is dedicated to scientific research, the results of which are used to promote public awareness and education in the areas of conservation biology and ecology,including the wise use of natural resources.

Animals
12
Western Rivers Conservancy

Western rivers conservancy's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states. continued on schedule o.we acquire land to conserve critical habitat, provide public access for compatible use and enjoyment, and…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ecostudies Institute and the most unlike its peers is The Willard G Pierce and Jessie M Pierce Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%44%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%24%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/149
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,416

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/60
Grantees still filing
46/60
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII SYSTEM — $1,702,696 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII SYSTEMSTATE OF HAWAII — $1,633,926 · OtherSTATE OF HAWAIITHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,096,600 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYWorman Forest Management — $984,775 · OtherWorman Forest Management+91 more — $4,314,947 · Other+91 morePACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION — $569,815 · EnvironmentPACIFIC RIM CONSERV…NEW YORK CITY BIRD ALLIANCE INC — $343,619 · EnvironmentNEW YORK CITY BIRD …GREEN FORESTS WORK INC — $314,193 · EnvironmentGREEN FORESTS WORK …NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION INC — $252,240 · EnvironmentNATIONAL WILD TURKE…COASTAL BEND BAYS & ESTUARIES PROGRAM INC — $184,391 · EnvironmentCOASTAL BEND BAYS &…NatureServe — $140,046 · EnvironmentMOLOKAI LAND TRUST — $136,582 · EnvironmentCOLUMBIA LAND TRUST — $130,000 · EnvironmentThe Houston Audubon Society — $120,330 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $112,072 · Environment+22 more — $623,861 · Environment+22 moreIUP RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $1,710,928 · Science & TechIUP RESEARCH…RAINFOREST CONNECTION — $82,777 · Science & TechCornell University — $233,115 · EducationJocotoco Conservation Foundation — $216,625 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $204,156 · EducationWASHINGTON COLLEGE — $62,000 · EducationTHE WILLARD G PIERCE AND JESSIE M PIERCE FOUNDATION — $27,617 · Education+2 more — $18,275 · EducationRAINFOREST TRUST — $615,287 · InternationalMESOAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CORPORATION — $29,915 · InternationalGULF COAST BIRD OBSERVATORY INC — $262,336 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation Society — $133,464 · AnimalsPaso Pacifico — $50,400 · AnimalsKLAMATH BIRD OBSERVATORY — $32,463 · AnimalsOREGON WILDLIFE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $24,514 · AnimalsWildmon Inc — $23,740 · Animals+3 more — $24,540 · AnimalsCARNEGIE INSTITUTE — $141,395 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $33,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD — $151,464 · Youth DevelopmentCONSERVATION LEGACY — $8,700 · Youth Development
Other$9,732,944Environment$2,927,149Science & Tech$1,793,705Education$761,788International$645,202Animals$551,457Arts & Culture$174,395Youth Development$160,164

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIUP RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $1,710,928 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,096,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST — $615,287 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION — $569,815 over 6y, 13% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BIRD ALLIANCE INC — $343,619 over 2y, 19% of budgetGREEN FORESTS WORK INC — $314,193 over 5y, 18% of budgetGULF COAST BIRD OBSERVATORY INC — $262,336 over 6y, 10% of budgetNATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION INC — $252,240 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCornell University — $233,115 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJocotoco Conservation Foundation — $216,625 over 3y, 16% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $204,156 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL BEND BAYS & ESTUARIES PROGRAM INC — $184,391 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD — $151,464 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE — $141,395 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNatureServe — $140,046 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMOLOKAI LAND TRUST — $136,582 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $133,464 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA LAND TRUST — $130,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Houston Audubon Society — $120,330 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $112,072 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGLACIERLAND RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COUNCILE INC — $90,428 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetEnvironmental Protection In The Caribbean Incorporated — $86,461 over 5y, 11% of budgetRAINFOREST CONNECTION — $82,777 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetWASHINGTON COLLEGE — $62,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWillistown Conservation Trust Inc — $51,203 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLONG TOM WATERSHED COUNCIL — $50,851 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetPaso Pacifico — $50,400 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetLOUISIANA WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetThe Wildlands Conservancy — $49,142 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILDLIFE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE INC — $39,694 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $33,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKLAMATH BIRD OBSERVATORY — $32,463 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc — $31,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILLARD G PIERCE AND JESSIE M PIERCE FOUNDATION — $27,617 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLand Conservancy of West Michigan — $27,480 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION — $26,519 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAVING NATURE INC — $25,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetWildmon Inc — $23,740 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetISLAND CONSERVATION — $22,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetECOSTUDIES INSTITUTE — $18,900 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetOKANOGAN LAND TRUST — $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican Conservation Experience — $13,986 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVIAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION INSTITUTE INC — $13,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $12,225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPesticide Action Network North America — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOLORADO OPEN LANDS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION LEGACY — $8,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBirdability — $8,300 over 1y, 8.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IUP RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY BIRD ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN FORESTS WORK INC ↗
  • Who funds GULF COAST BIRD OBSERVATORY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds Jocotoco Conservation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL BEND BAYS & ESTUARIES PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NatureServe ↗
  • Who funds MOLOKAI LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Audubon Society ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GLACIERLAND RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COUNCILE INC ↗
  • Who funds Environmental Protection In The Caribbean Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST CONNECTION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Fish and Wil…The Nature ConservancyNational Forest Found…Rocky Mountain Elk Fo…Resources Legacy FundNational Audubon Soci…Richard King Mellon F…American Forest Found…The Marisla FoundationLand Trust Alliance I…National Geographic S…National Park Foundat…
National Fish and Wildlife FoundationDC43.3× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · National Forest Foundation · Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Inc · Resources Legacy Fund · National Audubon Society Inc · Richard King Mellon Foundation · American Forest Foundation · The Marisla Foundation · Land Trust Alliance Inc · National Geographic Society · National Park Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Bird Conservancy funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Wildlife Management Institute Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Klamath Bird Observatory — 100% of income from government
  • Environmental Protection in the Caribbean Incorporated — 100% of income from government
  • Long Tom Watershed Council — 39% of income from government
  • Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation — 16% of income from government
  • Washington College — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 151 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines