Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cuore e Mani Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
87
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Housing & Shelter$2.6MPhilanthropy$1.8MHealth$882kHuman Services$611kCommunity Improvement$452kYouth Development$247kReligion$168kArts & Culture$113kOther$0
02FY2024 · 87 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k45 grants · $211k
  • $10k–50k37 grants · $587k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $266k
$7,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RENAISSANCE SOCIAL SERVICES INC$61,000
BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC$55,000
FOREFRONT$50,000
AMPT ADVANCING NONPROFITS$50,000
CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
MICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST$35,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO$27,500
INSPIRATION CORPORATION$27,500
NEW MOMS INC$27,500
MICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST$25,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA CHAP$25,000
ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS IN SUBURBAN COOK COUN$25,000
FOOD ACCESS PROJECT$25,000
CROSSROADS FUND$25,000
FOREFRONT$22,492
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $29k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $28k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $25k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $25k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $25k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $25k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $11k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $11k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $100k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $28k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $28k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $25k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $25k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $25k → 14%SOUTH SUBURBAN PADS: $10k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $25k → 14%SOUTH SUBURBAN PADS: $8k → 14%NEXT STEPS NFP: $200k → 14%CONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN: $10k → 14%SOUTH SUBURBAN PADS: $8k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $10k → 14%LYTE COLLECTIVE: $8k → 14%LYTE COLLECTIVE: $8k → 14%HEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES INC: $15k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $25k → 14%IGNITE ORG: $15k → 14%CHICAGO FURNITURE BANK INC: $11k → 14%CHICAGO FURNITURE BANK INC: $11k → 14%CHICAGO FURNITURE BANK INC: $10k → 14%CHICAGO FURNITURE BANK INC: $10k → 14%RENAISSANCE SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $61k → 14%RENAISSANCE SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $11k → 14%RENAISSANCE SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $10k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS INC: $10k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $38k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $28k → 14%FACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS: $10k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $25k → 14%FACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS: $10k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS INC: $10k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $25k → 14%RENAISSANCE SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $10k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $10k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $10k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
CA
MD
TN
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Cuore e Mani Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Cuore e Mani Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.8M · 65 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

65 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
46

Total granted

$5.8M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+25%

Still filing today

92%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthEducationInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • F
    FOREFRONT
    8× · 2017–2024 · $748k · revenue +179%
  • AC
    ALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $548k · revenue +639%
  • MR
    MICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST
    5× · 2020–2024 · $430k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • SC
    SANFORD C BERNSTEINAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $500k
  • NS
    NEXT STEPS NFP
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue 0% · 100% of their budget
  • LP
    Latinos Progresando
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
2
The Affordable Housing Corporation of Lake County

To provide decent, safe and sanitary housing that is affordable to low and moderate-income persons and to stabilize and strengthen communities by improving the local housing stock. the corporation shall administer programs that revitalize…

Human Services
3
Respond Now

Respond now connects those in need with health, hunger, and housing services in the chicago southland.

Human Services
4
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
5
Neighborhood Housing Services of Beloit Inc

Nhs is working to build the beloit, wisconsin community through programs that support home ownership, residents, and community development. nhs provides high-quality housing, lending, and educational opportunities and resources.

Housing & Shelter
6
Hcp of Illinois Inc

To reduce inter-generational poverty by promoting strategies that encourage racial and economic diversity in the housing market, primarily in the chicago area and nationally as well.

Housing & Shelter
7
You Can Make It

Providing interim housing for men, women and children, social services, homeless services, emergency shelter, and housing in chicago community for the homeless, poor and disadvantaged.

Human Services
8
Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for

Providing academic support to children experiencing homelessness in Chicago and providing resources and services to families experiencing homelessness in Chicago.

Education
9
Chicago Refugee Coalition

The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.

Human Services
10
Community Supportive Living Systems

To provide additional supportive housing, social, health, and other human services to the indigent and special needs individuals of chicago's inner city population and transitioning the homeless to a life of self- sufficiency and stability.

Housing & Shelter
11
Erie Neighborhood House

Erie neighborhood house provides the most comprehensive support to immigrant and low-income families in chicago. our mission is to empower our communitylatinx immigrants alongside individuals and families of all backgroundsthrough…

Human Services
12
Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago Inc

Nhs' mission is to create opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen their neighborhoods. nhs deploys a suite of products, services, and strategies to fulfill its mission, primarily…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is Inherentance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr15%10%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr13%38%35–55yr14%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%8%<5yr15%7%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr17%32%20–35yr13%46%35–55yr14%6%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/126
the rest of the field
15%
7,128/46,145

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 137 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
121/122
Grantees still filing
85/122
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY — $547,500 · Housing & ShelterALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNE…BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC — $395,000 · Housing & ShelterBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INCTHE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC — $104,325 · Housing & ShelterTHE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INCHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC — $99,500 · Housing & ShelterCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS — $95,500 · Housing & ShelterALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS IN SUBURBAN COOK COUNTY — $85,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $75,000 · Housing & Shelter+21 more — $519,903 · Housing & Shelter+21 moreSANFORD C BERNSTEINAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $500,000 · OtherSANFORD C BERNSTEINAMERICAN ENDO…CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $322,500 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE-NORTHWESTERN MEMO — $287,500 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE…BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC — $72,000 · OtherLatinos Progresando — $100,000 · OtherThe Cara Program — $76,000 · Other+54 more — $775,750 · Other+54 moreNEW MOMS INC — $265,000 · Human ServicesNEW MOMS INCNEXT STEPS NFP — $200,000 · Human ServicesNEXT STEPS NFPFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO — $187,900 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE CHIL…Inspiration Corporation — $152,500 · Human ServicesInspiration Corpora…Renaissance Social Services Inc — $102,000 · Human ServicesRenaissance Social …THE NIGHT MINISTRY — $52,000 · Human ServicesCHICAGO FURNITURE BANK — $47,000 · Human Services+16 more — $259,000 · Human Services+16 moreFOREFRONT — $748,111 · PhilanthropyFOREFRONTAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $200,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWM…+3 more — $67,500 · Philanthropy+3 moreMICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST — $430,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $50,000 · HealthESPERANZA HEALTH CENTERS — $45,000 · Health+7 more — $38,000 · HealthCHICAGO CARES INC — $210,000 · Community ImprovementAMPT ADVANCING NONPROFITS — $52,500 · Community ImprovementTHE RENAISSANCE COLLABORATIVE INC — $42,500 · Community ImprovementGarfield Park Community Council — $31,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $2,500 · Community ImprovementCorporate Accountability Lab — $60,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $25,000 · InternationalThe Global FoodBanking Network — $25,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $10,000 · International+1 more — $500 · International
Housing & Shelter$1,921,728Other$2,133,750Human Services$1,265,400Philanthropy$1,015,611Health$563,000Community Improvement$338,500International$145,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOREFRONT — $748,111 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY — $547,500 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetMICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST — $430,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC — $395,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetNEW MOMS INC — $265,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetCHICAGO CARES INC — $210,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT STEPS NFP — $200,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO — $187,900 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetInspiration Corporation — $152,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC — $104,325 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetRenaissance Social Services Inc — $102,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLatinos Progresando — $100,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC — $99,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS — $95,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS IN SUBURBAN COOK COUNTY — $85,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetThe Cara Program — $76,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $75,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC — $72,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRANCISCAN OUTREACH — $69,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCROSSROADS FUND INC — $62,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT — $61,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSt Leonard's Ministries — $60,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCorporate Accountability Lab — $60,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetSARAH'S CIRCLE — $53,270 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMPT ADVANCING NONPROFITS — $52,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY — $52,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD ACCESS PROJECT — $50,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetCHICAGO FURNITURE BANK — $47,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSPANISH COALITION FOR HOUSING — $45,113 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetESPERANZA HEALTH CENTERS — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RENAISSANCE COLLABORATIVE INC — $42,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCenter for Changing Lives — $42,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTH SUBURBAN PADS — $40,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDEBORAH'S PLACE — $40,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO REHAB NETWORK — $40,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetIGNITE — $40,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLECTIVE CHICAGO — $40,000 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetNORTH SIDE HOUSING AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES — $35,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS — $35,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $32,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGarfield Park Community Council — $31,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCatalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSING FORWARD — $27,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LYTE COLLECTIVE — $27,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY — $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOREFRONT ↗
  • Who funds ALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds MICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MOMS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEXT STEPS NFP ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Inspiration Corporation ↗
  • Who funds THE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds Renaissance Social Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Latinos Progresando ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS IN SUBURBAN COOK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT ↗
  • Who funds St Leonard's Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Corporate Accountability Lab ↗
  • Who funds SARAH'S CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds AMPT ADVANCING NONPROFITS ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ACCESS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO FURNITURE BANK ↗
  • Who funds SPANISH COALITION FOR HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds THE RENAISSANCE COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Changing Lives ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH SUBURBAN PADS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Polk Bros Foundation …The Pierce Family Cha…United Way of Metropo…All Chicago Making Ho…Arie and Ida Crown Me…Circle of Service Fou…The Chicago Community…John D and Catherine …George M Eisenberg Fo…Blowitz-Ridgeway Foun…Helen V Brach Foundat…Chicago Foundation fo…
Polk Bros Foundation IncIL88.6× affinity43 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Polk Bros Foundation Inc · The Pierce Family Charitable Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · All Chicago Making Homelessness History · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Circle of Service Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Blowitz-Ridgeway Foundation · Helen V Brach Foundation · Chicago Foundation for Women

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cuore e Mani Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 137 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home