· Private foundation
Alice Shaver Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k33 grants · $120k
- $10k–50k76 grants · $920k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS-NO CA COASTAL | $25,000 |
| IONA SENIOR SERVICES | $20,000 |
| COOL THE EARTH | $20,000 |
| REBUILDING TOGETHER MONTGOMERY COUN | $20,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $20,000 |
| NY CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | $20,000 |
| VIVALON | $20,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS OF TAKOMA PARK | $20,000 |
| CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK | $20,000 |
| CASA | $20,000 |
| FRESH FARM | $15,000 |
| ART ENABLES | $15,000 |
| WILLIAMSTOWN THEATRE FESTIVAL | $15,000 |
| MANNA FOOD CENTER | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.
101 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $345k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTHE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC9× · 2017–2025 · $220k · revenue +26%
- CTCOOL THE EARTH INC9× · 2017–2025 · $220k · revenue +664% · 51% of their budget
- BFBERKSHIRE FOOD PROJECT INC8× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +72%
Funded once
Civic Nationgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +241%- RFREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +219%
- HIHIAS INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +180%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…
Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…
Moveable feast's mission is to improve the health of marylanders experiencing food insecurity and chronic illness by preparing and delivering medically tailored meals and providing nutrition education, thereby achieving racial, social, and…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.
Usaging represents & supports the national network of area agencies on aging & advocates for the title vi native american aging programs that help older adults & people with disabilities live with optimal health, well-being, independence &…
To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…
To end chronic homelessness in washington, dc. the organization advocates for permanent supportive housing as a long-term solution, while meeting short-term needs by providing healthy meals and high-quality social services to the…
Meals on wheels of central maryland's charitable mission, to keep homebound people living safely and independently at home through the provision of nutritious meals, personal contact and support services, reduces hospitalization, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Calvary Women's Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Provincetown Jazz Festival Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 177 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds COOL THE EARTH INC ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE FOOD PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MANNA FOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds A WIDER CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds Stepping Stones Shelter Inc ↗
- Who funds CANAL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PROVINCETOWN JAZZ FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds SOME INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Vivalon ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds WEDNESDAYS GIFT ↗
- Who funds PROJECT AVARY INC ALTERNATIVE VENTURES FOR AT RISK YOUTH ↗
- Who funds RITTER CENTER ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST BOOK ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE NURSING FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds WILDCARE ↗
- Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPORTUNITY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Hancock Shaker Village Inc ↗
- Who funds Center for Domestic Peace ↗
- Who funds FRESHFARM MARKETS ↗
- Who funds PINE COBBLE SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Milton & Dorothy Sarnoff Raymond Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Marin Community Foundation · Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · William S Abell Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alice Shaver Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Second Street Second Chances Inc — 33% of income from government
- Stamford Public Education Foundation Inc — 22% of income from government
- The House of Ruth Maryland Inc — 19% of income from government
- Artpreneurs Inc — 18% of income from government
- North Adams Ambulance Service Inc — 12% of income from government
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
- Greenagers Inc — 7% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
- Hancock Shaker Village Inc — 1% of income from government
- Manna Food Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Pine Cobble School Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alice Shaver Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Alice Shaver Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.