Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Albert G Clay Family Foundation Robert & Charlotte Clay Co-Ttes

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$161kPublic Benefit$103kEducation$45kEnvironment$23kRecreation & Sports$10kCommunity Improvement$4kHealth$2kInternational$1kYouth Development$1kOther$171k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$41k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP$7,500
BLUEGRASS LAND CONSERVANCY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS$5,000
STRATFORD HALL$2,500
CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INC: $25k → 7%NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION: $2k → 14%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS: $3k → 6%SHAKER VILLAGE OF PLEASANT HILL: $10k → 13%HENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP: $15k → 15%NATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INC: $25k → 7%SHAKER VILLAGE OF PLEASANT HILL: $5k → 13%HENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP: $10k → 15%NATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING: $2k → 7%NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $51k → 14%SHAKER VILLAGE: $5k → 13%HENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP: $10k → 15%NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $35k → 14%THE SOCIETY FOR THE FOUR ARTS: $10k → 11%SHAKER VILLAGE OF PLEASANT HILL: $5k → 13%NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $14k → 14%SHAKER VILLAGE: $5k → 13%NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $13k → 14%THE SOCIETY FOR THE FOUR ARTS: $10k → 11%SHAKER VILLAGE: $2k → 13%NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $5k → 14%LEXINGTON SCHOOL: $25k → 15%THE SOCIETY FOR THE FOUR ARTS: $10k → 11%THE LEXINGTON SCHOOL: $15k → 15%THE TRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL: $5k → 14%THE SOCIETY FOR THE FOUR ARTS: $8k → 11%HENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP: $10k → 15%HENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP: $20k → 15%HENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP: $10k → 15%HENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP: $10k → 15%WADSWORTH-SULGRAVE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%HENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP: $10k → 15%BLUEGRASS CONSERVANCY: $5k → 15%BLUEGRASS CONSERVANCY: $5k → 15%UK MARKEY CANCER CENTER: $5k → 15%TOWN BRANCH PARK: $10k → 15%HENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP: $8k → 15%BLUEGRASS LAND CONSERVANCY: $5k → 15%HILLWOOD MUSEUM: $7k → 14%HILLWOOD MUSEUM: $5k → 14%BLUEGRASS LAND CONSERVANCY: $5k → 15%HILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS: $3k → 14%BLUEGRASS LAND CONSERVANCY: $3k → 15%HILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS: $3k → 14%HILLWOOD MUSEUM: $3k → 14%HILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS: $2k → 14%HILLWOOD MUSEUM: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$486k · 19 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
16

Total granted

$486k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+92%

Still filing today

79%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthPublic BenefitEnvironmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $103k · revenue +102%
  • LS
    LEXINGTON SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $40k · revenue +34%
  • TS
    The Society of the Four Arts Inc
    4× · 2018–2021 · $38k · revenue +720%

Funded once

  • TB
    TOWN BRANCH PARK INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -34%
  • UM
    UK MARKEY CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute

See schedule o for the organization's mission statement.please see description for part i, line 1, above.

Arts & Culture
3
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
4
National Academy of Design

The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.

Education
5
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
6
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
7
Tudor Place Foundation Inc

Tudor place historic house & garden preserves the stories of six generations of descendants of martha washington and the enslaved and free people who lived and worked at this georgetown landmark for nearly two centuries. by examining their…

8
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
9
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
10
Shaker Museum and Library

Shaker museum elevates shaker material culture to animate shaker values and beliefs and inspire individuals and communities to deepen bonds and seek meaningful approaches to social, economic, environmental, and spiritual issues.

Arts & Culture
11
Society of Architectural Historians

The mission of the society is to advance the knowledge and understanding of architecture, design, landscape and urbanism worldwide among scholars, professionals in allied fields (including architecture, historic preservation and planning)…

Arts & Culture
12
Brookgreen Gardens

Brookgreen gardens was formed in 1931 to collect, preserve and exhibit american sculpture, and the flora and fauna native to south carolina.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trust for the National Mall and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Veteran Support ServicesYouth Development CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Substance Abuse TreatmentIndependent K-8 SchoolsCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%27%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%8%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%35%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/25
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,540

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS — $118,450 · OtherTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE AR…HILLWOOD MUSEUM — $16,400 · OtherHILLWOOD MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient — $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+16 more — $27,620 · Other+16 moreNATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INC — $52,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INCThe Society of the Four Arts Inc — $38,000 · Arts & CultureThe Society of the Four Arts IncSTRATFORD HALL — $24,500 · Arts & CultureSTRATFORD HALLSHAKERTOWN AT PLEASANT HILL KENTUCKY INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureSHAKERTOWN AT PLEASANT HILL KENTUCK…HILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS — $7,200 · Arts & CultureTRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL — $6,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $12,930 · Arts & Culture+4 moreHENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP — $102,500 · Public BenefitHENRY CLAY CENTER FOR …LEXINGTON SCHOOL INC — $40,000 · EducationLEXINGTON…WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $2,500 · EducationWAKE FORE…Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation — $2,500 · EducationChildren …BLUEGRASS LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $22,500 · EnvironmentTOWN BRANCH PARK INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsBLUEGRASS TOMORROW INC — $4,000 · Community Improvement
Other$174,470Arts & Culture$160,630Public Benefit$102,500Education$45,000Environment$22,500Recreation & Sports$10,000Community Improvement$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS — $118,450 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP — $102,500 over 9y, 7.9% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INC — $52,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLEXINGTON SCHOOL INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Society of the Four Arts Inc — $38,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTRATFORD HALL — $24,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBLUEGRASS LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $22,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSHAKERTOWN AT PLEASANT HILL KENTUCKY INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTOWN BRANCH PARK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS — $7,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFUND FOR THE ENDOWMENT OF THE DIPLOMATIC RECEPTION ROOMS OF THE DEPT OF STATE — $4,680 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNational Gallery of Art — $4,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWAYSIDE HOUSE INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLUEGRASS TOMORROW INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetINNOCENTS AT RISK — $3,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWADSWORTH-SULGRAVE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJunior Achievement of the Bluegrass Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOCKEY CLUB SAFETY NET FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRC RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Hilary Boone Foundation Inc · Alex G Campbell Jr Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Isaac Van Meter IV Fam Fund Inc Agy · Alex Boone Charitable Trust Dated 12/01/98 · Vanmeterbarnhart Family Fund · Mary K Oxley Foundation · Rosenstein Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Christian Word Ministries Inc · The William Stamps Farish Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Albert G Clay Family Foundation Robert & Charlotte Clay Co-Ttes funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Wayside House Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Albert G Clay Family Foundation Robert & Charlotte Clay Co-Ttes?

Find your warmest path to Albert G Clay Family Foundation Robert & Charlotte Clay Co-Ttes through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph