How much did ALEX G CAMPBELL JR FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of ALEX G CAMPBELL JR FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

—

2025

lexington

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k24 grants · $83k
$10k–50k5 grants · $75k
$50k–250k2 grants · $100k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

TRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY$50,000
SHAKER VILLAGE OF PLEASANT HILL$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC$20,000
KENTUCKY EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION$15,000
THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC$15,000
OLD FRIENDS THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FARMS$15,000
GRAYSON JOCKEY CLUB$10,000
WORLDWIDE HEARTS & HANDS$7,500
CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL$5,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF KENTUCKIANA INC$5,000
JUBILEE JOBS OF LEXINGTON INC$5,000
KENTUCKY CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC$5,000
GOD'S PANTRY$5,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE BLUEGRASS$5,000
TRIANGLE FOUNDATION INC$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 95% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.1M · 29 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.1M

$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%

+35%

Still filing today

55%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationArts & CultureInternationalHealthRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TU
TRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY
6× · 2020–2025 · $300k · revenue +21%
WH
WORLDWIDE HEARTS & HANDS
6× · 2020–2025 · $83k · revenue +79%
KE
KENTUCKY EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION
6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +116%

Funded once

LL
LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +35%
TN
THE NEST
one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Kentucky Racing Health and

To benefit, aid, relief, and assist racing personnel employed in horse racing.

—

Kentucky Thoroughbred Owners & Breeders

To support and fund equine research

Animals

Kentucky Derby Museum Corporation

Engage,educate, and excite everyone about the extraordinary kentucky derby experience!

—

Kentucky County Judgeexecutive Associat

Provide services to governmental agencies.

—

Ky Access to Justice Commission Inc

Provided access to the courts and high-quality legal representation for people with low and moderate incomes living in kentucky.

Crime & Legal

Kentucky Thoroughbred Owners & Breeders

To advertise, foster and promote the thoroughbred horse industry in the commonwealth of kentucky

—

Kentucky Thoroughbred Association Inc

To advertise, foster and promote the thoroughbred horse industry

—

Kentucky Christian University

Higher education for christian leadership and service in the church and in professions.

Education

Horse Country Inc

To connect guests to the horse, land, and people of kentucky's signature equine industry through immersive experiences at unique member locations.

Membership Benefit

University of Kentucky Gluck Equine

To maintain/support a continuing partnership between uk and the equine industry of the commonwealth of ky to enhance and improve the equine research program at uk.

Education

Jobs for Kentucky's Graduates Inc

To assist at risk students to graduate from high school and successfully transition to work or further education

Education

Kentucky Equine Humane Center Inc

The mission of kentucky humane center, inc. (kyehc) is to provide humane treatment and shelter while working as a clearinghouse to seek adoptive homes for all of kentucky's unwanted equines, regardless of breed. kyehc is also committed to…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Transylvania University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/27

the rest of the field

295/3,220

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

26/27

Grantees still filing

23/27

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$519,500Education$405,000International$99,500Arts & Culture$84,500Youth Development$18,000Animals$15,000Health$13,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY36.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation Of · Hilary Boone Foundation Inc · Elhapa Foundation Inc · Christian Word Ministries Inc · The Mt Brilliant Family Foundation · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Don Jacobs Sr Charitable Foundation Inc · William T Young Foundation Inc · Vanmeterbarnhart Family Fund · United Way of the Bluegrass Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ALEX G CAMPBELL JR FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE RACE FOR EDUCATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~9 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 421546327 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE RACE FOR EDUCATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 9 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Alex G Campbell Jr Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Alex G Campbell Jr Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ALEX G CAMPBELL JR FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Alex G Campbell Jr Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

ALEX G CAMPBELL JR FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Alex G Campbell Jr Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph