Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Helen F & Louis Stolier Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$167k
Granted FY2024still arriving
81
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of THE HELEN F & LOUIS STOLIER FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 81 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k80 grants · $157k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIELDSTONE FARMS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MALTZ MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE$5,000
MALACHI HOUSE$4,000
COLLEGE NOW$3,000
LAW ENFORECEMENT FOUNDATION$3,000
HAPPY TRAILS FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY$3,000
CLEVELAND KIDS BOOK BANK$3,000
URSULINE COLLEGE$3,000
HUNGER NETWORK$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE$3,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV$3,000
ACHIEVEMENT CENTER FOR CHILDREN$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $82k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OPEN ARMS ADOPTIONS: $2k → 12%OPEN ARMS ADOPTIONS: $2k → 12%ZANE'S INC: $2k → 13%IN STEP WITH HORSES: $800 → 6%ZANE'S INC: $2k → 13%ZANE'S INC: $1k → 13%IN STEP WITH HORSES: $500 → 17%ZANE'S INC: $1k → 13%ZANE'S INC: $1k → 13%ZANE'S INC: $1k → 13%SEEDS OF LITERACY: $2k → 17%SEEDS OF LITERACY: $2k → 17%MERRICK HOUSE: $2k → 17%SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $2k → 17%SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $2k → 17%MERRICK HOUSE: $2k → 17%MERRICK HOUSE: $2k → 17%SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $2k → 17%SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $2k → 17%MERRICK HOUSE: $1k → 17%ADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%BIG HEARTED BLOOMS: $1k → 17%SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $3k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%CHAIR-ITY INC: $2k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $2k → 17%SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $2k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $2k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $4k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $4k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $4k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $4k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $2k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $2k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $2k → 17%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $1k → 17%MONTESSORI DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS: $3k → 17%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $1k → 17%NORTHEAST OHIO SPCA: $1k → 17%NORTHEAST OHIO SPCA: $500 → 17%NORTHEAST OHIO SPCA: $500 → 17%NORTHEAST OHIO SPCA: $400 → 17%NORTHEAST OHIO SPCA: $400 → 17%SEEDS OF LITERACY: $2k → 17%SEEDS OF LITERACY: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$997k · 99 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

99 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

99
42

Total granted

$997k
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+25%

Still filing today

55%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    The Maltz Museum of Jewish Heritage
    8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +37%
  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +50%
  • MH
    MALACHI HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • US
    URSULINE SISTER OF CLEVELAND
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • ND
    NOTRE DAME COLLEGE THRIVE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • SA
    ST ANSELM SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope for Cleveland's Children
—
2
Cleveland Leadership Center

The mission of cleveland leadership center (the organization) is to build a continuum of civic leaders committed to our community's excellence by serving as a catalyst for civic engagement. the organization achieves its mission by…

Education
3
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
4
Literary Cleveland

Literary Cleveland assists writers and readers at all stages of development, promotes new and existing literature of the highest quality, and advances Northeast Ohio as a vital center of diverse voices and visions.

Education
5
United Cerebral Palsy Association of Greater Cleveland Inc

The mission of united cerebral palsy is to empower children and adults with disabilities to advance their independence, productivity and inclusion in the community.

Health
6
Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

—
7
University of Cleveland Preparatory School

Our mission is to prepare students for a college preparatory high school that will ensure success and graduation and acceptance into a four year college.

Education
8
Community Learning Center Institute

Clci facilitates the ongoing engagement of the greater cincinnati community to promote the development of all schools as community learning centers, each with a set of financially self-sustaining, co-located community partners.

Education
9
Lead Ohio

At lead ohio our goal is to make a difference in communities across ohio by recruiting, training, supporting and empowering progressive leaders in all regions of the state.

Education
10
College Now Greater Cleveland Inc

College now's mission is to increase postsecondary educational attainment through college and career access advising, financial aid counseling and scholarship and retention services.

Education
11
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Cleveland

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Youth Development
12
Breakthrough Public Schools

The breakthrough public schools mission is to provide cleveland area scholars with an education that empowers them to lead lives full of impact and opportunity.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Cleveland and the most unlike its peers is Bighearted Blooms. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Care ServicesSupportive Services & Housi…Public Charter SchoolsProfessional Trade Associat…Youth Development & Early E…Faith-Based Charitable Mini…Performing Arts EducationPublic School District Foun…Senior Affordable HousingJewish Federation Cleveland…Healthcare Support Organiza…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%8%5–10yr16%21%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr19%20%35–55yr19%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%3%5–10yr16%12%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr19%19%35–55yr19%49%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/90
the rest of the field
13%
1,299/9,728

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 155 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
80/82
Grantees still filing
54/82
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIELDSTONE FARMS — $55,900 · OtherFIELDSTONE FARMSIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · Other+103 more — $631,300 · Other+103 moreCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $23,000 · EducationCASE WESTER…NOTRE DAME COLLEGE — $19,000 · EducationNOTRE DAME …THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES — $18,000 · EducationTHE OHIO FO…Saint Martin de Porres High School — $18,000 · EducationSaint Marti…URSULINE COLLEGE — $17,500 · EducationURSULINE CO…CLEVELAND KIDS' BOOK BANK — $16,500 · EducationCLEVELAND K…+3 more — $5,200 · EducationThe Maltz Museum of Jewish Heritage — $28,000 · Arts & CultureThe Maltz…LAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTER — $15,000 · Arts & CultureLAKE ERIE…THE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT — $14,500 · Arts & CultureTHE CLEVE…CLEVELAND CENTER FOR ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY — $14,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND…CLEVELAND SCHOOL OF THE ARTS BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $14,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND…CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $8,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND…+1 more — $3,000 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC — $22,000 · Human ServicesSHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS — $12,500 · Human ServicesSEEDS OF LITERACY — $8,000 · Human ServicesZANES INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesMERRICK HOUSE — $7,000 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERING PLACE — $6,500 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS ADOPTIONS INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesMONTESSORI DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS — $3,000 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST OHIO SPCA INC — $2,800 · Human Services+5 more — $8,300 · Human ServicesLIFEACT — $11,500 · HealthREPLAY FOR KIDS — $8,000 · HealthREGINA HEALTH CENTER — $7,000 · HealthNAMI-GREATER CLEVELAND — $6,000 · HealthMILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES — $6,000 · HealthEmpowering Epilepsy — $5,000 · HealthAUTISM SOCIETY OF GREATER AKRON — $3,000 · Health+2 more — $2,000 · HealthHUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY — $16,000 · AnimalsONE HEALTH ORGANIZATION — $10,000 · AnimalsTHE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE — $6,200 · AnimalsBEREA'S ANIMAL RESCUE FUND INC — $3,000 · AnimalsHAPPY TRAILS FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $3,000 · AnimalsKirtland Bird Club — $2,000 · AnimalsBRADYS K9 FUND — $2,000 · AnimalsNEIGHBORHOOD PETS — $2,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc — $2,000 · AnimalsTHE WELL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $7,000 · Community ImprovementUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED — $6,000 · Community Improvement
Other$712,200Education$117,200Arts & Culture$96,500Human Services$81,600Health$48,500Animals$46,200Community Improvement$13,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Maltz Museum of Jewish Heritage — $28,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMALACHI HOUSE INC — $23,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC — $22,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE IGNITES CINCINNATI — $21,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNOTRE DAME COLLEGE — $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES — $18,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY CONNECTION — $18,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN — $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSaint Martin de Porres High School — $18,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetURSULINE COLLEGE — $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND KIDS' BOOK BANK — $16,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY — $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTER — $15,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT — $14,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND CENTER FOR ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY — $14,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCLEVELAND SCHOOL OF THE ARTS BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $14,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELAND — $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS — $12,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBUILDING HOPE IN THE CITY — $12,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH CHALLENGE — $12,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLIFEACT — $11,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC — $11,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetONE HEALTH ORGANIZATION — $10,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSHAKER LAKES REGIONAL NATURE CENTER DBA NATURE CENTER AT SHAKER LAKES — $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES — $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND VOLUNTEERS — $9,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $8,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF LITERACY — $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetREPLAY FOR KIDS — $8,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetEFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY — $7,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetZANES INC — $7,500 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetMERRICK HOUSE — $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WELL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREGINA HEALTH CENTER — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE — $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE — $6,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI-GREATER CLEVELAND — $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEmpowering Epilepsy — $5,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetZELIE'S HOME — $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOPEN ARMS ADOPTIONS INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCITYMUSIC CLEVELAND INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMONTESSORI DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Maltz Museum of Jewish Heritage ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MALACHI HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES CINCINNATI ↗
  • Who funds URBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NOTRE DAME COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Saint Martin de Porres High School ↗
  • Who funds URSULINE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND KIDS' BOOK BANK ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds LAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND CENTER FOR ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND SCHOOL OF THE ARTS BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING HOPE IN THE CITY ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds LIFEACT ↗
  • Who funds LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland Foundat…The Swagelok Foundati…The Char and Chuck Fo…The Reinberger Founda…The Sk Wellman Founda…Higley Fund of the Cl…The Louise H & David …The Lozick Family Fou…Robert H Reakirt Fdn …Edwin D Northrup II F…Emma R Fox Char Trust…The Sam J Frankino Fo…
The Cleveland FoundationOH83.4× affinity47 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Swagelok Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · The Sk Wellman Foundation · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · The Louise H & David S Ingalls Fdn · The Lozick Family Foundation · Robert H Reakirt Fdn Equities · Edwin D Northrup II Fund · Emma R Fox Char Trust Mut Fds · The Sam J Frankino Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Helen F & Louis Stolier Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    36report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 155 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines