Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Accion Opportunity Fund Community Development

Accion opportunity fund's mission is to deliver affordable capital and responsible financial solutions to underserved entrepreneurs and communities, with a special focus on low-income people, people of color, and women.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182025.

Community Improvement$530kInternational$100kHuman Services$85kEmployment$80kHealth$10kOther$250k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $115,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,190,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,075,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$257M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACCESSITY$30,000
HOT BREAD KITCHEN INC$30,000
CENTER FOR WOMEN & ENTERPRISE INC$30,000
INDUSTRIAL COUNCIL OF NEARWEST CHICAGO (ICNC) THE HATCHERY$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%HOT BREAD KITCHEN INC: $30k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $25k → 20%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $25k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$390k · 5 repeat orgs$665k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
15

Total granted

$390k
$665k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+174%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesInternationalEmploymentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ACCION INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue -30%
  • HB
    HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD
    3× · 2023–2025 · $80k · revenue -25%
  • CENTER FOR WOMEN & ENTERPRISE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $80k · revenue -8%

Funded once

  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +57%
  • TD
    TEAMWORKS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue +255%
  • AF
    ALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fresno Community Development Financial Institution dba Access Plus Capital

Access plus capital is nonprofit small business lender and service provider with the mission to eliminate economic barriers to financial success through fair and equitable community investment.

Public Benefit
2
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

3
Initiative for a Competitive Inner City Inc

Icic drives inclusive economic prosperity in under-resourced communities through innovative research and programs to create jobs, income, and wealth for local residents.

Housing & Shelter
4
Los Altos Chamber of Commerce

To encourage and promote businesses and to stimulate a vibrant economy in los altos and los altos hills.

5
Inner City Law Center

In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.

Crime & Legal
6
First Community Capital Inc

First Community Capital, Inc. (FCCI) is a certified Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) dedicated to expanding access to affordable capital and technical assistance for small businesses and individuals, with a focus on low-…

Employment
7
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
8
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
9
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
10
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
11
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

12
Inclusive Communities Project

Promote fair and affordable housing for low income families, free from the vestiges of segregation and discrimination.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inclusive Action for the City and the most unlike its peers is Hot Bread Kitchen Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS — $250,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERSALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INCACCESSITY — $80,000 · Community ImprovementACCESSITYPACIFIC COMMUNITY VENTURES INC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementJEFFERSON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $25,000 · Community ImprovementFresno Area Hispanic Foundation — $25,000 · Community ImprovementINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY — $25,000 · Community ImprovementTEAMWORKS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $150,104 · OtherTEAMWORKS DEVELOPMENT INST…INDUSTRIAL COUNCIL OF NEARWEST CHICAGO — $50,000 · OtherINDUSTRIAL COUNCIL OF NEAR…WORLD EMPANADAS INC — $10,000 · OtherLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION — $10,000 · OtherSTEPAHNIE ALVES DBA ABL LLC — $10,000 · OtherCOSMETICA LATINA EDU INC — $10,000 · Other+2 more — $10,000 · OtherACCION INTERNATIONAL — $100,000 · InternationalACCION INT…HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD — $80,000 · Human ServicesHOT BREAD…COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES — $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMPASS F…CENTER FOR WOMEN & ENTERPRISE INC — $80,000 · EmploymentNorthern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services — $10,000 · Health
Community Improvement$530,000Other$250,104International$100,000Human Services$85,000Employment$80,000Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS — $250,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetACCION INTERNATIONAL — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD — $80,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR WOMEN & ENTERPRISE INC — $80,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetACCESSITY — $80,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINDUSTRIAL COUNCIL OF NEARWEST CHICAGO — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPACIFIC COMMUNITY VENTURES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJEFFERSON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $25,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetFresno Area Hispanic Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetNorthern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wells Fargo FoundationMN20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wells Fargo Foundation · Citi Foundation · Opportunity Finance Network · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Accion Opportunity Fund Community Development funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 27%
  • Center for Women & Enterprise Inc27% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph