Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

1011 Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$9.7MArts & Culture$6.9MHealth$5.0MAnimals$1.7MInternational$1.1MCivil Rights$915kCrime & Legal$822kHuman Services$818kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $306k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.1M
$50,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$72M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILKEN INSTITUTE$333,000
NEW VENTURE FUND$250,000
AMERICA-ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITIION$250,000
NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE$250,000
LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART$200,000
FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM$183,000
BND USA FOUNDATION$144,282
EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF LOS ANGELES$125,000
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$125,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$100,000
HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL$100,000
CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$100,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$100,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$100,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $545k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $7k → 6%CALL OF DUTY ENDOWMENT: $500k → 14%CALL OF DUTY ENDOWMENT: $520 → 14%WESTSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $3k → 14%VISIONARY WOMEN: $10k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $15k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
NE
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of 1011 Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

1011 Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$21M · 40 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

40 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
77

Total granted

$21M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+15%

Still filing today

83%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthAnimalsInternationalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MUSEUM ASSOCIATES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +89%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +44%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    2× · 2020–2023 · $2.6M · revenue +139% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • 8F
    803011 FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $7.3M · revenue -99% · 100% of their budget
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $1.1M
  • CU
    CORNELL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE
    one grant, 2022 · $500k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
12
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Call of Duty Endowment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterMilitary Veterans SupportCommunity FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Health Access Advocacy and …Cancer Support ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Youth Development CentersDance Arts OrganizationsYouth Sports ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Policy Research and AdvocacySchool District FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Local History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%42%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/109
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,456

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 143 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
105/105
Grantees still filing
71/105
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DUKE UNIVERSITY — $3,067,231 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION — $1,600,094 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCAT…UCLA FOUNDATION — $1,190,895 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL — $682,000 · EducationHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOLTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE — $600,000 · EducationTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENT…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $550,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY …UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $433,017 · EducationMANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW — $422,034 · Education+11 more — $653,820 · Education+11 moreUniversity of Michigan — $2,568,731 · OtherUniversity of MichiganTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER — $1,086,942 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDER…CAMPBELL HALL -EPISCOPAL- — $795,000 · OtherCAMPBELL HALL -EPISCOPAL-THE MILKEN INSTITUTE — $716,000 · OtherTHE MILKEN INSTITUTECORNELL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE — $500,000 · OtherBROWN UNIVERSITY — $1,111,942 · OtherBROWN UNIVERSITYTHE CALL OF DUTY ENDOWMENT — $500,520 · Other+74 more — $3,364,564 · Other+74 more803011 FOUNDATION — $7,260,000 · Philanthropy803011 FOUNDATION+5 more — $380,000 · PhilanthropyMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $3,621,184 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATESMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $2,234,625 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM …New Civil Liberties Alliance — $250,000 · Arts & Culture+12 more — $552,500 · Arts & Culture+12 moreEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $487,128 · Civil RightsFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC — $283,000 · Civil RightsPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION — $224,000 · Civil RightsPACER CENTER INC — $150,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $100,000 · Civil RightsBND USA Foundation INC — $970,321 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $125,000 · International+6 more — $63,550 · InternationalPAWS UNITE PEOPLE INC — $625,000 · AnimalsTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $333,333 · AnimalsGUARDIAN HEALS INC — $100,000 · Animals+6 more — $57,500 · Animals
Education$9,199,091Other$10,643,699Philanthropy$7,640,000Arts & Culture$6,658,309Civil Rights$1,244,128International$1,158,871Animals$1,115,833

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget803011 FOUNDATION — $7,260,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $3,621,184 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $3,067,231 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $2,568,731 over 2y, 29% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $2,234,625 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION — $1,600,094 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $1,190,895 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $1,111,942 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE — $716,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL — $682,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS UNITE PEOPLE INC — $625,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE — $600,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $550,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CALL OF DUTY ENDOWMENT — $500,520 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $487,128 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $433,017 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW — $422,034 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $333,333 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC — $283,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNew Civil Liberties Alliance — $250,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetAMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION — $250,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION — $224,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $210,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION — $207,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $160,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPACER CENTER INC — $150,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $110,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCHOOL OF LOS ANGELES — $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUARDIAN HEALS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetMADISON PROJECT — $85,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBHPOA BENEVOLENT FUND — $75,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetEMILY KRZYZEWSKI CENTER INC — $75,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM — $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIOVINE AND YOUNG FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCIA OFFICERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PAID IN FULL FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAIRBNBORG INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Jewish Community Foun…The Annenberg Foundat…The Goldman Sachs Cha…The Ralph M Parsons F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Smidt FoundationThe Ahmanson Foundati…Jewish Communal FundMorgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…
California Community FoundationCA23.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Annenberg Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Smidt Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization 1011 Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to 1011 Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to 1011 Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 143 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines