Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Ohio Capital Impact Corporation

The OHIO CAPITAL IMPACT CORPORATION (ocic) was formed in december of 2012 as the non-profit, philanthropic arm of ohio capital corporation for housing.

$2.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
71
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$264k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Housing & Shelter$11MHuman Services$2.7MCommunity Improvement$2.6MEducation$2.1MRecreation & Sports$901kReligion$881kArts & Culture$709kHealth$607kOther$0
02FY2024 · 71 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 71 grants below total $2,537,819 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,667,099 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $129,280 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k48 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+1 grant · $264k
$23,142
Median grant
10
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOUISVILLE METRO HOUSING AUTHORITY$264,000
COMMUNITY PROPERTIES IMPACT CORPORATION$207,741
RESIDENT RESOURCES NETWORK INC$146,713
CORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING$121,500
COLUMBUS METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY$80,000
COLUMBUS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC HOMEPORT$77,000
MEMPHIS HOUSING AUTHORITY$75,000
COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO$75,000
COMMUNITY HOUSING NETWORK INC$73,067
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY-MIDOHIO$60,000
EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT SERVICES FOUNDATION$55,000
OVER-THE-RHINE COMMUNITY HOUSING$53,147
WESTERN RESERVE REVITLIZATION AND MANAGEMENT CO INC$50,419
MAXTON MANOR OF LIVINGSTON LLLP$50,000
HOMELAND INC$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BATESVILLE AREA RESOURCE CENTER: $17k → 12%INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $50k → 15%BRIGHTON PROPERTIES INC: $30k → 10%CANTON FOR ALL PEOPLE INC: $25k → 13%FRONTIER COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50k → 14%URBAN STRATEGIES INC: $20k → 21%YWCA OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $25k → 18%URBAN STRATEGIES INC: $92k → 21%DAYBREAK: $35k → 14%YWCA OF YOUNGSTOWN: $21k → 19%URBAN STRATEGIES INC: $88k → 21%BUILDING FOR TOMORROW (AKRON METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY): $74k → 13%DAYBREAK: $35k → 14%YWCA MAHONING VALLEY: $20k → 19%URBAN STRATEGIES INC: $44k → 21%BUILDING FOR TOMORROW (AKRON METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY): $36k → 13%URBAN STRATEGIES INC: $25k → 21%BUILDING FOR TOMORROW (AKRON METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY): $29k → 13%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S PLACE INC: $17k → 15%URBAN STRATEGIES INC: $25k → 21%URBAN STRATEGIES INC: $25k → 21%CINCINNATI HAMILTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $15k → 16%THE PHEBE FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT SERVICES FOUNDATION: $60k → 16%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC: $30k → 17%EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT SERVICES FOUNDATION: $55k → 16%EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT SERVICES FOUNDATION: $34k → 16%EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT SERVICES FOUNDATION: $30k → 16%CINCINNATI UNION BETHEL: $50k → 16%CINCINNATI UNION BETHEL: $20k → 16%CINCINNATI UNION BETHEL: $15k → 16%SAINT STEPHEN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $32k → 15%CINCINNATI UNION BETHEL: $15k → 16%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $25k → 15%COLUMBUS WORKS INC: $20k → 15%CHOICES: $30k → 15%CHOICES: $25k → 15%CHOICES: $25k → 15%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $119k → 15%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $85k → 15%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $70k → 15%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $25k → 15%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $25k → 15%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $25k → 15%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $25k → 15%YWCA COLUMBUS: $23k → 15%YWCA COLUMBUS: $20k → 15%YWCA COLUMBUS: $19k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
ND
MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 137 repeat orgs$4.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

137 repeat relationships — 52 still active in FY2024, 85 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

137
160

Total granted

$19M
$3.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+31%

Still filing today

79%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $432k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COLUMBUS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +350%
  • IK
    I KNOW I CAN
    5× · 2017–2023 · $947k · revenue +26%
  • CO
    COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $768k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • OC
    OHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +72%
  • HD
    HS DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $120k
  • AM
    ABC MANAGEMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $113k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbus Housing Initiative Inc

Stabilize neighborhoods through establishing financing, education, rehabilitation of existing housing and development of new housing

Housing & Shelter
2
The Home Ownership Center of Greater Cincinnati in

The home ownership center is a non-profit that has been serving the cincinnati metro area since 1973, and is a member of the neighbor works network.

Housing & Shelter
3
The Affordable Housing Trust for Columbus and Franklin County

Facilitate and invest in developments designed to: create and preserve affordable homeownership and rental housing; strengthen and stabilize neighborhoods; support working households, seniors and special needs populations.

Housing & Shelter
4
Ywca Housing Corporation

To encourage the development and operation of affordable residential real estate in downtown columbus for women with limited income and own and/or operate affordable residential real estate in downtown columbus for women with limited…

—
5
Habitat for Humanity of Cleveland Inc

Habitat for humanity of cleveland is a non-profit christian housing ministry. habitat works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities for people in need by building and selling houses…

Housing & Shelter
6
Affordable Housing Alliance of Central Ohio

Ensuring that everyone in central ohio has a safe, decent, affordable home through advocating for the needs of clients, low and moderate-income people living in central ohio, impacting public policy, and working to enhance system…

Housing & Shelter
7
Chn Housing Capital

Chn housing capital is a certified community development financial institution serving low-income individuals and distressed communities guided by the belief that homeownership should be within everyone's reach.

Human Services
8
Neighborhood Properties Inc

To develop and manage a continuum of stable and supportive housing for persons with serious mental illness and co-occuring disorders

Health
9
Strategies to End Homelessness Inc

Strategies to End Homelessness leads a coordinated community effort to end homelessness in Greater Cincinnati.

Human Services
10
United Way of North Central Ohio Inc

At united way of north central ohio, we bring people, organizations, and resources together to create solutions that improve the lives of every person in every community in our region.

—
11
United Church Residences of Delaware

To Provide Safe and Affordable Housing for Low-Income Persons.

—
12
Community Housing Network Inc

Community housing network's (chn) mission is to empower people to live in affordable homes to help build thriving communities.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Housing Partnership of Greater Springfield and the most unlike its peers is Tony R Wells Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersYouth Mentoring ProgramsEquine Therapy ProgramsDomestic Violence ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyJewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsAffordable Housing Construc…United Way AffiliatesYmca Youth DevelopmentAffordable Housing Developm…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%1%<5yr12%6%5–10yr21%12%10–20yr14%25%20–35yr16%39%35–55yr20%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%5%5–10yr21%10%10–20yr14%25%20–35yr16%48%35–55yr20%12%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.3%1/313
the rest of the field
11%
8,037/73,993

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

221 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 221 of the 317 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
57
Early backer (in before they grew)
216/221
Grantees still filing
155/221
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

I KNOW I CAN — $947,000 · OtherI KNOW I CANCOLUMBUS METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY — $757,295 · OtherCOLUMBUS METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITYPINNACLE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION — $308,385 · OtherGREATER COLUMBUS COMMUNITY HELPING HANDS INC — $327,500 · Other+111 more — $6,712,385 · Other+111 moreCOLUMBUS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC — $1,367,231 · Housing & ShelterCOLUMBUS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP I…COMMUNITY PROPERTIES IMPACT CORPORATION — $937,802 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY PROPERTIES IMPACT CO…OVER THE RHINE COMMUNITY HOUSING — $519,788 · Housing & ShelterOVER THE RHINE COMMUNITY HOUSI…BUCKEYE COMMUNITY HOPE FOUNDATION — $427,288 · Housing & ShelterBUCKEYE COMMUNITY HOPE FOUNDAT…COMMUNITY HOUSING NETWORK INC — $418,731 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY HOUSING NETWORK INCEAST AKRON NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $354,955 · Housing & ShelterEAST AKRON NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELO…WESTERN RESERVE REVITALIZATION AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC — $280,347 · Housing & ShelterCORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING — $246,500 · Housing & ShelterST MARY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $245,788 · Housing & Shelter+17 more — $1,277,693 · Housing & Shelter+17 moreRESIDENT RESOURCES NETWORK INC — $750,317 · Community ImprovementRESIDENT RES…OHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION — $500,000 · Community ImprovementOHIO CAPITAL…NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC — $160,303 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD…LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $155,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIA…OHIO CDC ASSOCIATION INC — $149,000 · Community ImprovementOHIO CDC ASS…CINCINNATI CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $115,245 · Community ImprovementPartners Achieving Community Transformation Inc — $97,500 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD — $90,000 · Community ImprovementOHIO HOUSING COUNCIL — $87,926 · Community Improvement+14 more — $419,410 · Community Improvement+14 moreYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO — $398,989 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN…URBAN STRATEGIES INC — $332,591 · Human ServicesURBAN STR…EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT SERVICES FOUNDATION — $178,500 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL…BUILDING FOR TOMORROW — $147,496 · Human ServicesBUILDING …Cincinnati Union Bethel — $128,792 · Human ServicesCincinnat…YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $107,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOM…Ohio Healthy Homes Network — $90,000 · Human ServicesCHOICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $85,000 · Human ServicesDAYBREAK INC — $69,870 · Human Services+12 more — $391,703 · Human Services+12 moreCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR ALL PEOPLE — $664,500 · ReligionChabad of Columbus Inc — $170,000 · ReligionWESLEY CHAPEL MISSION CENTER — $86,218 · ReligionFound House-Interfaith Housing Network — $50,000 · ReligionOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $687,728 · EducationEASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $45,000 · EducationA CALL TO COLLEGE — $40,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $36,500 · Education+4 more — $111,000 · EducationCOALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO — $767,657 · Employment+1 more — $25,000 · Employment
Other$9,052,565Housing & Shelter$6,076,123Community Improvement$2,524,701Human Services$1,929,941Religion$970,718Education$970,228Employment$792,657

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLUMBUS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC — $1,367,231 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetI KNOW I CAN — $947,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY PROPERTIES IMPACT CORPORATION — $937,802 over 6y, 27% of budgetCOALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO — $767,657 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetRESIDENT RESOURCES NETWORK INC — $750,317 over 8y, 9.2% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $687,728 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR ALL PEOPLE — $664,500 over 6y, 10% of budgetOVER THE RHINE COMMUNITY HOUSING — $519,788 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetOHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION — $500,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetBUCKEYE COMMUNITY HOPE FOUNDATION — $427,288 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING NETWORK INC — $418,731 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO — $398,989 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetEAST AKRON NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $354,955 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetURBAN STRATEGIES INC — $332,591 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER COLUMBUS COMMUNITY HELPING HANDS INC — $327,500 over 6y, 44% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC — $286,805 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIO — $285,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE REVITALIZATION AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC — $280,347 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER OHIO POLICY CENTER INC — $267,500 over 8y, 12% of budgetTENDER MERCIES INC — $260,372 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetCORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING — $246,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $245,788 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY SHELTER BOARD — $233,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetEPISCOPAL RETIREMENT SERVICES FOUNDATION — $178,500 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetChabad of Columbus Inc — $170,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC — $160,303 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $155,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO CAPITAL CORPORATION FOR HOUSING — $154,937 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY BUILDERS INC — $149,150 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO CDC ASSOCIATION INC — $149,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetBUILDING FOR TOMORROW — $147,496 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetEPISCOPAL RETIREMENT SERVICES — $146,450 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OHIO INC — $129,233 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetCincinnati Union Bethel — $128,792 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COLLABORATIVE OF GREATER COLUMBUS — $125,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetCHN HOUSING PARTNERS — $119,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCINCINNATI CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $115,245 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION — $110,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $108,142 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $107,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HAMILTON OHIO INC — $100,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetPartners Achieving Community Transformation Inc — $97,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetPRESERVATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC — $94,580 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD — $90,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetOhio Healthy Homes Network — $90,000 over 7y, 38% of budgetOHIO HOUSING COUNCIL — $87,926 over 5y, 11% of budgetSENIOR HOUSING CRIME PREVENTION FOUNDATION INC — $87,720 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWESLEY CHAPEL MISSION CENTER — $86,218 over 4y, 5.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLUMBUS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds I KNOW I CAN ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PROPERTIES IMPACT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO ↗
  • Who funds RESIDENT RESOURCES NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR ALL PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds OVER THE RHINE COMMUNITY HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds OHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BUCKEYE COMMUNITY HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSING NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO ↗
  • Who funds EAST AKRON NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds URBAN STRATEGIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER COLUMBUS COMMUNITY HELPING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIO ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE REVITALIZATION AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER OHIO POLICY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TENDER MERCIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SHELTER BOARD ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chabad of Columbus Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds OHIO CAPITAL CORPORATION FOR HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY BUILDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO CDC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING FOR TOMORROW ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds Cincinnati Union Bethel ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Financial Found…Ohio Community Develo…United Way of Central…Carol Ann and Ralph V…Tr Ua Fifth Third Fou…The CareSource Founda…L Brands FoundationCoalition on Homeless…Harry C Moores Founda…John a Schroth Family…Columbus FoundationThe Thomas J Emery Me…
First Financial FoundationOH72.1× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Financial Foundation · Ohio Community Development Finance Fund · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Tr Ua Fifth Third Foundation · The CareSource Foundation · L Brands Foundation · Coalition on Homelessness and Housing in Ohio · Harry C Moores Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Columbus Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ohio Capital Impact Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
  • The Community Builders Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Preservation of Affordable Housing Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 317 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home