· Private foundation
Winifred Johnson Clive Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $646k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WildCare | $50,000 |
| Trustees of Columbia University | $50,000 |
| A Gift for Teaching Inc | $50,000 |
| 10000 Degrees | $50,000 |
| Rollins College | $42,000 |
| GlamourGals Foundation Inc | $40,500 |
| Dr Phillips Center for Performing A | $40,000 |
| Sunrise Horse Rescue | $40,000 |
| Opera Orlando Inc | $35,000 |
| Old Skool Cafe | $35,000 |
| Willowtail Springs Nature Preserve | $35,000 |
| Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing | $31,500 |
| Medicine Horse Center | $30,000 |
| Central Christian Church | $25,500 |
| Orlando Health Foundation | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $391k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WWILDCARE8× · 2017–2024 · $300k · revenue +1%
- AGA GIFT FOR TEACHING INC8× · 2017–2024 · $291k · revenue +52%
- TMThe Medicine Horse Center8× · 2017–2024 · $265k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- RMRollins Museum of Artone grant, 2023 · $178k
- HTHeart to Heartone grant, 2017 · $35k
- SFSAN FRANCISCO ART INSTITUTEone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -99%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)
The academy is a renowned scientific and educational institution with a mission to regenerate the natural world through science, learning, and collaboration. based in san francisco's golden gate park, it is home to a world-class aquarium,…
The monterey museum of art cultivates curiosity in the visual arts and engages community with the diversity of california art - past, present, and future.
Gage educates, enriches, & transforms our community through the visual arts.
Marin open studios is a non-profit visual arts organization dedicated to engaging and supporting marin county artists and their audiences through events, programs and services. marin open studios champions a diverse and inclusive community…
To connect young people to the wonder and science of the natural world, igniting self-discovery and inspiring stewardship of our planet.
Epacenter's mission is to increase opportunities for youth to discover and amplify their talents, realize their potential, and impact the world through art, design, and technology.
The institution provides educational instruction and activities to students ranging from preschool through 8th grade.
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…
Our mission is to engage, educate and excite the community by collecting, exhibiting, and preserving works of art for the enjoyment of all. the museum of fine arts, st. petersburg, florida (mfa) is the cultural leader of our community. our…
To connect all people with wildlife, inspire caring for nature, and advance conservation action.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crooked Tree Arts Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is United in Light Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WILDCARE ↗
- Who funds A GIFT FOR TEACHING INC ↗
- Who funds The Medicine Horse Center ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE HORSE RESCUE ↗
- Who funds OPERA ORLANDO INC ↗
- Who funds Orlando Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GLAMOURGALS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MUTTVILLE ↗
- Who funds Old Skool Cafe ↗
- Who funds DR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds THE HENRY NEHRLING SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL FLORIDA COMMUNITY ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
- Who funds ROLLINS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
- Who funds BACH FESTIVAL SOCIETY OF WINTER PARK ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds BUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING ↗
- Who funds EDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds ORLANDO MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds The Gift of Swimming Inc ↗
- Who funds PEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds ORLANDO BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds SOUL SHOPPE PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds THE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds MBOLDEN CHANGE ↗
- Who funds THE HUB ON CANAL INC ↗
- Who funds OAKLAND NATURE PRESERVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNITY CARE GROUP ↗
- Who funds CURIODYSSEY ↗
- Who funds ORLANDO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Florida Foundation · Magruder Chesley G Fdn Im · United Arts of Central Florida Inc · Mary Palmer Family Foundation Inc · Elizabeth Morse Genius Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Pabst Steinmetz Foundation Inc · The Warren and Augusta Hume Foundation Inc · Universal Orlando Foundation Inc · Elaine B & Scott B Taylor Foundation · Anderson-Devitt Foundation Inc · The Lee Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Winifred Johnson Clive Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
- Talisman Therapeutic Riding Inc — 25% of income from government
- Atlantic Center for the Arts Inc — 5% of income from government
- Enzian Theater Inc — 1% of income from government
- Rollins College — 0% of income from government
- Orlando Museum of Art Inc — 0% of income from government
- Dr Phillips Center for the Performing Arts Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Winifred Johnson Clive Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Winifred Johnson Clive Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.