Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Alexander M & June L Maisin Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the peninsula, marin and sonoma counties.

$2.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$10MPhilanthropy$5.9MHuman Services$2.3MHealth$1.4MInternational$1.2MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.2MArts & Culture$925kReligion$571kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k25 grants · $507k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $680k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$65M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC (JDC)$1,000,000
10000 DEGREES$561,500
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION$225,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION$105,273
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL$100,000
FAMILY HOUSE INC$50,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION$50,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION$50,000
UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE$50,000
LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES$50,000
ST ANTHONY'S AKA ST ANTHONY FOUNDATION$40,000
JEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE$35,000
JEWISH FILM INSTITUTE$35,000
BNAI BRITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT UCB DBA BERKELEY HILLEL$30,000
SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $595k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CITY YOUTH NOW: $8k → 10%CITY YOUTH NOW: $8k → 10%CITY YOUTH NOW: $8k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $10k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $10k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $10k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $10k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $10k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $10k → 10%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $10k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $10k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $10k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $10k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $50k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $50k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $50k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $50k → 10%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $8k → 10%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $8k → 10%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $8k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $50k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $50k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $50k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $50k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of Alexander M & June L Maisin Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 78% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Alexander M & June L Maisin Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 21% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18M · 40 repeat orgs$193k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

40 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
3

Total granted

$18M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-4%

Still filing today

85%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 1D
    10000 DEGREES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +65%
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +24%
  • GF
    GLIDE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF MARIN
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • PE
    PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • HF
    HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue -4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
3
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
4
San Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc

(continued from page 1) nationally and internationally. Further, J seeks to enrich the cultural, religious and social life of the community through its articles, interviews and features.

Education
5
Jewish Family and Children's Services

Jewish family and children's services exists to provide professional and volunteer services for the purposes of developing, restoring, and maintaining the competency of families and individuals of all ages. traditionally, jewish family and…

Human Services
6
Sf Partnership

SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…

—
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
9
San Francisco Family Foundation
—
10
Advance Sf

Advance SF is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco through education, advocacy, and research. The…

Human Services
11
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
12
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is Bay Area Jewish Healing Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr20%20%20–35yr15%39%35–55yr13%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr20%3%20–35yr15%21%35–55yr13%68%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/50
the rest of the field
11%
940/8,791

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
27/43
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

San Francisco Education Fund — $5,761,830 · EducationSan Francisco Education Fund10000 DEGREES — $2,418,350 · Education10000 DEGREESUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $748,965 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOU…THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE — $435,000 · Education+2 more — $75,000 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $6,868,673 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF…GLIDE FOUNDATION — $1,977,226 · ReligionGLIDE FOUN…CANAL ALLIANCE — $200,000 · ReligionCANAL ALLI…REBOOT INC — $86,000 · Religion+1 more — $25,000 · ReligionThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $2,090,000 · InternationalThe Ameri…HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA — $140,000 · InternationalHAND IN H…JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $470,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMU…ST ANTHONY FOUNDATION — $355,000 · OtherST ANTHONY F…JEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE — $315,000 · OtherJEWISH VOCAT…WILDCARE — $120,000 · OtherLarkin Street Youth Services — $450,000 · OtherLarkin Stree…LEGAL AID OF MARIN — $110,000 · OtherFAMILY & CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER — $105,000 · Other+21 more — $958,423 · Other+21 moreTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM — $320,000 · Arts & CultureJewish Film Institute — $235,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER — $190,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $180,000 · Arts & CultureFAMILY HOUSE INC — $460,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc — $105,000 · HealthBUCKELEW PROGRAMS — $60,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $40,000 · HealthLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED — $30,000 · Health
Education$9,439,145Philanthropy$6,868,673Religion$2,288,226International$2,230,000Other$2,883,423Arts & Culture$925,000Health$695,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $6,868,673 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetSan Francisco Education Fund — $5,761,830 over 6y, 56% of budget10000 DEGREES — $2,418,350 over 2y, 12% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $2,090,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetGLIDE FOUNDATION — $1,977,226 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $748,965 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $470,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC — $460,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services — $450,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE — $435,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM — $320,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE — $315,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Film Institute — $235,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE — $200,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER — $190,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $180,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA — $140,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetWILDCARE — $120,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLEGAL AID OF MARIN — $110,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc — $105,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER — $105,000 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetTENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND — $90,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBay Area Jewish Healing Center — $90,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $90,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetREBOOT INC — $86,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTHE JEWISH HOME AND SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMISSION GRADUATES — $75,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBUCKELEW PROGRAMS — $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco CASA — $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBERKELEY HILLEL — $30,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO INTERFAITH COUNCIL — $25,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO HILLEL — $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFriends of the Fromm Institute for Life-Long Learning — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCITY YOUTH NOW FKA VOLUNTEER AUXILIARY YOUTH GUIDANCE CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $22,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $13,423 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINSTITUTE ON AGING — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE ↗
  • Who funds THE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Film Institute ↗
  • Who funds CANAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
  • Who funds WILDCARE ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID OF MARIN ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND ↗
  • Who funds Bay Area Jewish Healing Center ↗
  • Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds REBOOT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH HOME AND SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSION GRADUATES ↗
  • Who funds BUCKELEW PROGRAMS ↗
  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco CASA ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Fede…The San Francisco Fou…Marin Community Found…Koret FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Lisa & Douglas Goldma…McNabb FoundationWalter and Elise Haas…Ralph & Marsha Guggen…John Pritzker Family …The Harry and Jeanett…Bernard Osher Jewish …
Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA38.8× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Koret Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · McNabb Foundation · Walter and Elise Haas Fund · Ralph & Marsha Guggenheim Family Foundation · John Pritzker Family Fund · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Bernard Osher Jewish Philanthropies

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alexander M & June L Maisin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alexander M & June L Maisin Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Alexander M & June L Maisin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home