Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ritchie-Kirk Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Animals$210kHealth$139kFood & Nutrition$39kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kCrime & Legal$17kPhilanthropy$17k
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$178k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SEEING EYE$15,000
SERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM$3,000
TESS MCINTYRE FOUNDATION$3,000
COURTHOUSE DOGS FOUNDATION$3,000
SEATTLE ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
THE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC$2,750
REDROVER$2,500
NEIGHBOR GOOD$2,500
SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT INC$2,500
CAUSE 4 PAWS PET FOOD BANK$2,500
WISKERS RESCUE INC$2,500
NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION INC$2,250
MADISON COMMUNITY CATS$1,500
LUNCH BREAK$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 48% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%CAUSE 4 PAWS PET FOOD BANK: $5k → 11%TRI-CITY PANTRY: $3k → 6%NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%TESS MCINTYRE FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%REDROVER: $6k → 12%COURTHOUSE DOGS FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%THE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $6k → 4%SERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM: $6k → 6%SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT INC: $5k → 8%POPCORN PARK ZOO: $6k → 11%POPCORN PARK ZOO: $5k → 16%MADISON COMMUNITY CATS: $5k → 11%CAUSE 4 PAWS PET FOOD BANK: $4k → 11%NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 10%TESS MCINTYRE FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%REDROVER: $5k → 12%COURTHOUSE DOGS FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%THE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5k → 4%SERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM: $5k → 6%SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT INC: $4k → 8%POPCORN PARK ZOO: $5k → 11%CAUSE 4 PAWS PET FOOD BANK: $4k → 11%NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 10%TESS MCINTYRE FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%REDROVER: $5k → 12%COURTHOUSE DOGS FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%THE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5k → 4%SERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM: $5k → 6%SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT INC: $4k → 8%POPCORN PARK ZOO: $5k → 11%NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 10%THE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5k → 4%SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT INC: $4k → 8%POPCORN PARK ZOO: $5k → 11%SEATTLE HUMANE: $6k → 9%THE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5k → 4%SERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM: $5k → 6%SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT INC: $4k → 8%POPCORN PARK ZOO: $5k → 11%SEATTLE HUMANE: $6k → 9%SERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM: $5k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $11k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $10k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $10k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $10k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $6k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $5k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Ritchie-Kirk Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Ritchie-Kirk Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$442k · 18 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against -26% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$442k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-26%

Still filing today

61%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SEEING EYE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +52%
  • MC
    MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA
    7× · 2017–2023 · $57k · revenue +104%
  • SC
    SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT IN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • SP
    SPECIAL PEOPLE UNITED TO RIDE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle Area Feline Rescue Fka Animal Talk Rescue

Safe rescue saves feline lives by taking in homeless cats, giving them the care they need, finding them loving homes, and supporting their human companions. we do this because we believe each cat has inherent value and that humans and…

Animals
2
Animal Samaritans

At Animal Samaritans we champion compassion and respect for all living creatures, with a primary focus on dogs, cats, and the people who love them. We view pets not merely as animals, but as members of our families. As their guardians and…

Animals
3
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
4
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
5
Partners for Animal Welfare Society

Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.

Animals
6
Second Chance Humane Society Inc

Improving the lives of animals by fostering the human-animal bond.

Animals
7
Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County Inc

None

Animals
8
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
9
Second Chance Pet Adoptions Inc

To champion homeless cats and dogs who are healthy or treatable in the quest to find their forever homes and engage with our community to provide responsible pet ownership reducing future generations of homeless animals.

Animals
10
Tompkins County Spca

The mission of the SPCA of Tompkins County is to protect companion animals. We are a no-kill shelter dedicated to preventing animal cruelty and overpopulation. We promote responsible pet stewardship by providing education, counseling and…

Animals
11
Silicon Valley Pet Project

Silicon valley pet project (svpp) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to saving local at-risk shelter pets through rescue, community involvement and education.

Animals
12
The Animal Haven Inc

The animal haven's misson is to provide a temporary, safe, caring and humane refuge for homeless dogs and cats and place these animals in quality adoptive homes.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Animal Nations Dba Redrover and the most unlike its peers is Special People United to Ride Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $37,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM — $32,000 · OtherSERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALMTHE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $31,500 · OtherTHE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INCUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER — $21,000 · OtherUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVERTESS MCINTYRE FOUNDATION INC — $17,000 · OtherTESS MCINTYRE FOUNDATION INCTRI-CITY PANTRY — $7,000 · Other+3 more — $9,000 · Other+3 moreMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA — $56,500 · AnimalsMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCASECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT IN — $28,000 · AnimalsSECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION A…CAUSE4PAWS PET FOOD BANK — $21,000 · AnimalsCAUSE4PAWS PET FOOD BANKSEATTLE ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION — $13,000 · AnimalsSEATTLE ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATIONTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY — $12,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING …MADISON COMMUNITY CATS — $8,000 · AnimalsMADISON COMMUNITY CATS+1 more — $2,500 · AnimalsTHE SEEING EYE INC — $105,000 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INCNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $24,500 · HealthCourthouse Dogs Foundation — $17,000 · Crime & LegalLUNCH BREAK INC — $4,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$154,500Animals$141,000Human Services$105,000Health$24,500Crime & Legal$17,000Food & Nutrition$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC — $105,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA — $56,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT IN — $28,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $24,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCAUSE4PAWS PET FOOD BANK — $21,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER — $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCourthouse Dogs Foundation — $17,000 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetSEATTLE ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION — $13,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY — $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMADISON COMMUNITY CATS — $8,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetLUNCH BREAK INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWHISKERS RESCUE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSPECIAL PEOPLE UNITED TO RIDE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC
  • Who funds MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA
  • Who funds SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT IN
  • Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CAUSE4PAWS PET FOOD BANK
  • Who funds UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER
  • Who funds Courthouse Dogs Foundation
  • Who funds SEATTLE ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY
  • Who funds MADISON COMMUNITY CATS
  • Who funds LUNCH BREAK INC
  • Who funds WHISKERS RESCUE INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL PEOPLE UNITED TO RIDE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ritchie-Kirk Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Lunch Break Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph