· Private foundation
The Howard Johnson Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $79k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $187k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARTHA'S VINEYARD HOSPITAL INC | $52,500 |
| VINEYARD PRESERVATION TRUST | $31,000 |
| ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER | $30,000 |
| ZIGGY'S HAVEN BIRD SANCTUARY | $25,000 |
| FRESH AIR FUND | $20,500 |
| ASPCA | $20,000 |
| HOUSE OF FEATHERS | $10,000 |
| ONE PLYMPTON PRESERVATION FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER | $10,000 |
| VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER | $10,000 |
| SHARON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| HARVARD COLLEGE FUND | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA | $7,000 |
| RIDGEFIELD ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| BOSTON BRUINS FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
47 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MVMARTHA'S VINEYARD PRESERVATION TRUST INC5× · 2021–2025 · $180k · revenue +75%
- JMJupiter Medical Center Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $134k · revenue +45%
- TATHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER6× · 2019–2025 · $115k · revenue +30%
Funded once
TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMYone grant, 2019 · $52k · revenue -2%- MDMacular Degeneration Associationgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +25%
- HVHOUSATONIC VALLEY COALITIONone grant, 2021 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…
To provide, promote, and advance humane protection, care and treatment of animals thru education of the public and the operation of an animal shelter which cares for, spays and neuters, and places homeless pets in permanent homes.
Our mission is to spark people's curiosity to explore, steward, and find peace and joy in nature. in service to this, norman bird sanctuary inspires, builds, and engages a community of stewards who preserve, protect, enjoy, and learn from…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.
The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…
Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Macular Degeneration Association ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds The Danbury Hospital ↗
- Who funds Spelman College ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds TABOR ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Mission K9 Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds KABOOM INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ↗
- Who funds Warrior Dog Foundation ↗
- Who funds ZIGGY'S HAVEN BIRD SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds THE SPORTS MUSEUM OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds HOBE SOUND NATURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds Foxcroft School ↗
- Who funds Peggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Friends of Acadia ↗
- Who funds RIDGEFIELD ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Mount Desert Land and Garden Preserve ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colket Family Foundation · Cornelia Cogswell Rossi Foundation Inc · Ethel D Colket Foundation · Florence V Burden Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · E Newbold & Margaret Dupont Smith F Foundation (Dba Thornedge Fdn) · Gerrish H Milliken Foundation 009209-009 · The Diomedes Foundation · Hattie a and Fred C Lynam Trust · Fore River Foundation · Diana Davis Spencer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Howard Johnson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Sports Museum of New England Inc — 5% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Preservation Trust Inc — 4% of income from government
- Jupiter Medical Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Island Housing Trust Corporation — 1% of income from government
- The Danbury Hospital — 1% of income from government
- Rollins College — 0% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.