Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

United Philanthropy Forum

As the largest and most diverse network in american philanthropy, UNITED PHILANTHROPY FORUM holds a unique position in the social sector to help increase philanthropy's impact in communities across the country.

$258k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$3.5MPhilanthropy$1.7MCommunity Improvement$775kHuman Services$740kCivil Rights$600kArts & Culture$505kHealth$390kEducation$355kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $193,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $258,152 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $65,152 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $175k
$25,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOREFRONT$25,000
PHILANTHROPY MISSOURI$25,000
PHILANTHROPY COLORADO$25,000
NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE & FOOD SYSTEMS FUNDERS$25,000
THE FUNDERS NETWORK$25,000
HISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY$25,000
MINNESOTA COUNCIL ON FOUNDATIONS$6,000
FUNDERS FOR LGBTQ ISSUES$6,000
PATH PARTNERSHIPS$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $725k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALIANZA NACIONAL DE CAMPESINAS INC: $80k → 10%PARA LOS NINOS: $65k → 14%SANTA CRUZ COMMUNITY VENTURES: $60k → 15%HAWAII PEOPLES FUND: $65k → 9%WOMENS FOUNDATION FOR A GREATER MEMPHIS: $65k → 17%ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES (ETSS): $65k → 15%TEEN HEALTH MISSISSIPPI: $65k → 23%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $65k → 10%PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS: $80k → 11%YWCA USA INC: $65k → 14%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

9%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$629k · 11 repeat orgs$6.7M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
110

Total granted

$629k
$6.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
96%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’24
PhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PHILANTHROPY COLORADO
    3× · 2018–2024 · $78k · revenue +33%
  • PN
    PHILANTHROPY NORTHWEST
    2× · 2018–2022 · $53k · revenue +25%
  • PM
    PHILANTHROPY MISSOURI
    2× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $140k · revenue -4%
  • NEO Philanthropy Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $130k · revenue +27%
  • FOUNDATION FOR LOUISIANAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $130k · revenue +55%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
2
Womens Funding Network

Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

Education
3
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
4
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
5
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
6
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Hispanic Access Foundation

Hispanic access foundation connects latinos and others to partners and opportunities to improve lives and create an equitable society.

Human Services
9
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
10
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
11
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Rush University Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal Food System Organizat…Community FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsSchool District FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Community Arts CentersYouth Development ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …United Way AffiliatesAffordable Housing Developm…Health Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 SchoolsLgbtq+ Community SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Immigrant Worker Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/161
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,404

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

157 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 157 of the 161 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
157/157
Grantees still filing
88/157
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $130,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Fo…GRANTMAKERS CONCERNED WITH IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEES — $87,500 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPY COLORADO — $77,500 · Philanthropy+39 more — $1,902,500 · Philanthropy+39 moreHISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY — $150,000 · Other+63 more — $3,932,070 · Other+63 moreHOPA MOUNTAIN INC — $80,000 · Community ImprovementHOPA MOUNTAI…CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC — $70,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR E…Northern Manhattan Coalition For Immigrant Rights — $70,000 · Community ImprovementNorthern Man…BROOKLYN COMMUNITIES COLLABORATIVE INC — $65,000 · Community ImprovementBROOKLYN COM…Horizons Foundation — $65,000 · Community ImprovementHorizons Fou…Resilience Partners NFP — $65,000 · Community ImprovementResilience P…LA VOICE — $65,000 · Community ImprovementLA VOICELOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $65,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIA…HISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $65,000 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC FED…Center for African American Health — $65,000 · Community ImprovementCenter for A…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS — $65,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ASS…COMMON FUTURE — $65,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON FUTUR…Wayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc — $63,840 · Community ImprovementWayne-Metrop…KINDRED FUTURES INC — $60,000 · Community ImprovementKINDRED FUTU…NDN COLLECTIVE INC — $60,000 · Community ImprovementNDN COLLECTI…PROSPERITY NOW — $60,000 · Community ImprovementPROSPERITY N…Alianza Nacional de Campesinas Inc — $80,000 · Human ServicesAlianza N…PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS — $80,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERSH…YWCA USA INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesYWCA USA …ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES — $65,000 · Human ServicesETHIOPIAN…THE PEOPLE'S FUND — $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPL…THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN…PARA LOS NINOS — $65,000 · Human ServicesPARA LOS …SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesSEVENTH G…WOMEN'S FOUNDATION FOR A GREATER MEMPHIS — $65,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S F…TEEN HEALTH MISSISSIPPI — $65,000 · Human ServicesTEEN HEAL…LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $65,000 · Human ServicesLATINO CO…VENTURES — $60,000 · Human ServicesVENTURESLatino Community Fund of Washington State — $50,000 · Human ServicesLatino Co…CENTER FOR LABOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC — $80,000 · Civil RightsFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $70,000 · Civil RightsILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $70,000 · Civil RightsBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $65,000 · Civil RightsCampaign For Southern Equality — $65,000 · Civil RightsThe Pride Foundation — $65,000 · Civil RightsPHILANTHROFUND FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 · Civil RightsORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY — $60,000 · Civil RightsARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT — $60,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $6,000 · Civil RightsALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $140,000 · Arts & CultureCoalition of Asian American Leaders — $70,000 · Arts & CultureAlternate RootsInc — $70,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LATINO ARTS AND CULTURE — $65,000 · Arts & CulturePOTLATCH FUND — $65,000 · Arts & CultureBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $65,000 · Arts & CultureFIRST PEOPLES FUND — $60,000 · Arts & CultureCenter for Traditional Music and Dance Inc — $30,000 · Arts & CultureSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $140,000 · EducationNACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK — $80,000 · EducationPROTEUS FUND INC — $65,000 · EducationTHE SCHOTT FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION — $65,000 · EducationAIDS UNITED — $65,000 · EducationIOWA COUNCIL OF FOUNDATIONS — $50,000 · EducationBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA — $50,000 · Education+1 more — $7,500 · Education
Philanthropy$2,197,500Other$4,082,070Community Improvement$1,048,840Human Services$855,000Civil Rights$606,000Arts & Culture$565,000Education$522,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY — $150,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $140,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $140,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $130,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR LOUISIANA — $130,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $130,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRANTMAKERS CONCERNED WITH IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEES — $87,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAlianza Americas — $80,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetCENTER FOR LABOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC — $80,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetRush University Medical Center — $80,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlianza Nacional de Campesinas Inc — $80,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetHOPA MOUNTAIN INC — $80,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS — $80,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLittle Village Environmental Justice Org — $80,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHEADWATERS FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE — $80,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK — $80,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $80,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $80,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW MEXICO FARMERS MARKETING ASSOCIATION — $80,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetPHILANTHROPY COLORADO — $77,500 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetCoalition of Asian American Leaders — $70,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetDREAMING OUT LOUD INC — $70,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC — $70,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWESTSIDE HEALTH AUTHORITY — $70,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST — $70,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNEWARK ARTS COUNCIL — $70,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetLIVE IN PEACE — $70,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAlternate RootsInc — $70,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNa'ah Illahee Fund — $70,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAsian Pacific Environmental Network — $70,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $70,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDORCAS INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF RHODE ISLAND INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH — $70,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNorthern Manhattan Coalition For Immigrant Rights — $70,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $70,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRURAL ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INTERNATION — $65,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetYWCA USA INC — $65,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA — $65,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBROOKLYN COMMUNITIES COLLABORATIVE INC — $65,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSouthern Plains Tribal Health Board Foundation — $65,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRAM MANAGEMENT — $65,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $65,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY — $65,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBread and Roses Community Fund — $65,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES — $65,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…Tides FoundationNorthwest Area Founda…WK Kellogg FoundationRsf Social Finance IncThe Ford FoundationSurdna Foundation IncThe Robert Wood Johns…Wellspring Philanthro…The Schmidt Family Fo…ImpactassetsincThe Fb Heron Foundati…
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC48.3× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Northwest Area Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · The Ford Foundation · Surdna Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The Fb Heron Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Philanthropy Forum funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Farm Aid Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Southern Plains Tribal Health Board Foundation — 83% of income from government
  • Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc — 69% of income from government
  • Newark Arts Council — 16% of income from government
  • United Way of Southwestern Oregon — 12% of income from government
  • Womens Foundation of Oregon — 0% of income from government
  • Philanthropy Delaware Fka Delaware Grantmakers Association — 0% of income from government
  • Seeding Justice — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
43report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 161 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines