Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mayberg Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
124
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Religion$21MPhilanthropy$5.5MEducation$4.4MInternational$2.8MHuman Services$1.5MCivil Rights$629kFood & Nutrition$613kEnvironment$400kOther$0
02FY2024 · 124 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k49 grants · $131k
  • $10k–50k45 grants · $964k
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+6 grants · $5.4M
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AISH GLOBAL$1,500,000
MOMENTUM$1,317,500
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,142,649
MY KEREN HASHLUCHIM INC$950,000
HADAR$276,667
Individual grant recipient$250,000
MAKOR CHAIM USA$176,667
LEHRHAUS CENTER$150,000
ORTHODOX UNION$145,720
PARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES$125,000
JEWISHROC$120,000
Individual grant recipient$108,000
YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON$100,720
ISRALIGHT SOUTH FLORIDA$100,000
JEWISH COMM RELATIONS COUNCIL$85,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $815k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BELEV ECHAD: $35k → 9%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $45k → 14%FRIENDS OF YASHAR LACHAYAL: $5k → 8%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $25k → 14%OPERATION EMBRACE FOUNDATION: $22k → 8%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $25k → 14%ISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL: $18k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $25k → 14%ISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL: $10k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $25k → 14%LIFE'S DOOR: $540 → 20%SHIDDUCH CENTER OF BALTIMORE: $2k → 19%OPERATION EMBRACE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%SHIDDUCH CENTER OF BALTIMORE: $2k → 19%SHIDDUCH CENTER OF BALTIMORE: $2k → 19%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $360 → 13%SHIDDUCH CENTER OF BALTIMORE: $2k → 19%OPERATION EMBRACE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%SHIDDUCH CENTER OF BALTIMORE: $2k → 11%SHIDDUCH CENTER OF BALTIMORE: $2k → 19%BIKUR CHOLIM MIAMI: $500 → 15%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $1k → 14%YAMBA MALAWI: $50k → 17%YAMBA MALAWI: $50k → 17%YAMBA MALAWI: $36k → 17%OPERATION EMBRACE FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%OPERATION EMBRACE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%OPERATION EMBRACE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%OPERATION EMBRACE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%SULAM: $50k → 8%SULAM: $36k → 8%SULAM: $36k → 8%SULAM: $36k → 8%SULAM: $36k → 8%SULAM: $5k → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $30k → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $30k → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $30k → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $30k → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $30k → 8%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $500 → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $17k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$35M · 160 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

160 repeat relationships — 102 still active in FY2024, 58 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

160
153

Total granted

$35M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+28%

Still filing today

59%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $7.5M · revenue +2%
  • AG
    AISH GLOBAL INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $5.8M · revenue +65%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    5× · 2018–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • JA
    JERUSALEM AISH HATORAH FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $375k
  • U
    UJEF
    one grant, 2022 · $322k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $110k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
2
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
University of Judaism Foundation
5
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
7
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
8
American Friends of Neveh Zion

To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel

Religion
9
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
10
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
11
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
12
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Heart of a Nation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Food Banks and PantriesChristian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Health Access Advocacy and …Youth Development ServicesCommunity Arts CentersIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%52%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1.0%2/206
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,359

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

170 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 170 of the 338 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
44
Early backer (in before they grew)
165/170
Grantees still filing
123/170
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC — $7,529,600 · ReligionMOMENTUM UNLIMITED INCAISH GLOBAL INC — $5,775,000 · ReligionAISH GLOBAL INC+13 more — $1,676,180 · Religion+13 moreJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,049,208 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $1,000,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientM Y KEREN HASHLUCHIM INC — $950,000 · OtherM Y KEREN HASHLUCHIM INCJEWISH ROCKVILLE OUTREACH CONGREGATION — $840,000 · OtherJEWISH ROCKVILLE OUTREACH CONGREGATIONIndividual grant recipient — $648,000 · OtherHADAR — $637,000 · OtherORTHODOX UNION — $507,137 · Other+112 more — $7,378,841 · Other+112 moreThe George Washington University — $1,540,828 · EducationThe George…YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $908,720 · EducationYESHIVA OF…CHARLES E SMITH JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $260,000 · EducationCHARLES E …HEBREW AT THE CENTER INC — $151,000 · EducationPRIZMAH CENTER FOR JEWISH DAY SCHOOLS INC — $150,250 · Education+15 more — $629,047 · Education+15 moreTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $2,258,022 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH…INCUBATOR FOR EMERGING JEWISH INITIATIVES INC — $812,250 · PhilanthropyINCUBATOR …Amatz Initiative — $150,000 · Philanthropy+11 more — $357,659 · Philanthropy+11 moreAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $375,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel — $365,800 · InternationalFUND FOR ISRAEL'S TOMORROW — $360,000 · InternationalPARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC — $275,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC — $258,420 · InternationalFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $252,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH — $200,000 · InternationalMAKOR CHAIM USA INC — $176,667 · InternationalTHE IDI FOUNDATION INC FKA AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEMOC — $150,000 · InternationalINNOVATION AFRICA — $120,089 · International+10 more — $274,622 · InternationalSulam Inc — $199,180 · Human ServicesJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY — $166,800 · Human ServicesMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $145,000 · Human ServicesYAMBA MALAWI INC — $136,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION EMBRACE FOUNDATION INC — $86,500 · Human ServicesBELEV ECHAD INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesGreater Washington Jewish Coalition Contd — $30,000 · Human ServicesISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL — $28,000 · Human Services+1 more — $10,800 · Human ServicesCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $250,100 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $165,000 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $130,000 · Food & Nutrition
Religion$14,980,780Other$14,010,686Education$3,639,845Philanthropy$3,577,931International$2,807,598Human Services$837,280Food & Nutrition$545,100

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC — $7,529,600 over 7y, 16% of budgetAISH GLOBAL INC — $5,775,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $2,258,022 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetThe George Washington University — $1,540,828 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $908,720 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetINCUBATOR FOR EMERGING JEWISH INITIATIVES INC — $812,250 over 4y, 86% of budgetSECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $375,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOPENDOR MEDIA INC — $370,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $365,800 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFUND FOR ISRAEL'S TOMORROW — $360,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetISRALIGHT SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $305,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetPARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC — $275,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetCHARLES E SMITH JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $260,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC — $258,420 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetPROJECT INSPIRE INC — $255,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $252,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $250,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH — $200,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetSulam Inc — $199,180 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetMELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY — $195,680 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetENDOWMENT FOR MIDDLE EAST TRUTH — $193,000 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetMAKOR CHAIM USA INC — $176,667 over 1y, 19% of budgetJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY — $166,800 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLev Experience — $165,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $165,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMESORAH INC — $161,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetHEBREW AT THE CENTER INC — $151,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetPRIZMAH CENTER FOR JEWISH DAY SCHOOLS INC — $150,250 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetAmatz Initiative — $150,000 over 4y, 48% of budgetTHE IDI FOUNDATION INC FKA AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEMOC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAISH HATORAH OF WASHINGTON DC INC — $148,500 over 7y, 8.1% of budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $145,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetYAMBA MALAWI INC — $136,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $130,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINNOVATION AFRICA — $120,089 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE MARYLAND JEWISH EXPERIENCE — $110,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH — $105,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetALEF BET MONTESSORI SCHOOL — $103,171 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetHeart of A Nation — $99,999 over 3y, 29% of budgetCLARION PROJECT INC — $97,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSUNFLOWER BAKERY INC — $93,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetOPERATION EMBRACE FOUNDATION INC — $86,500 over 7y, 15% of budgetFUCHS MIZRACHI SCHOOLS — $73,830 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY — $73,688 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILTON GOTTESMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF THE NATION'S CAPITAL — $65,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetShoresh Inc — $60,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC — $57,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC
  • Who funds AISH GLOBAL INC
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC
  • Who funds The George Washington University
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC
  • Who funds INCUBATOR FOR EMERGING JEWISH INITIATIVES INC
  • Who funds SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OPENDOR MEDIA INC
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel
  • Who funds FUND FOR ISRAEL'S TOMORROW
  • Who funds ISRALIGHT SOUTH FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds PARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC
  • Who funds CHARLES E SMITH JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC
  • Who funds PROJECT INSPIRE INC
  • Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH
  • Who funds Sulam Inc
  • Who funds MELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY
  • Who funds ENDOWMENT FOR MIDDLE EAST TRUTH
  • Who funds MAKOR CHAIM USA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington IncMD72.2× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jewish Communal Fund · The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Fjc · Aviv Foundation Inc · Mayberg Family Charitable Foundation · Brian and Dafna Berman Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mayberg Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 470%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Greater Washington Jewish Coalition Contd28% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc11% of income from government
  • A Wider Circle Inc6% of income from government
  • Mesivta Kesser Torah of Baltimore Inc5% of income from government
  • Melvin J Berman Hebrew Academy2% of income from government
  • The Torah School of Greater Washington Inc2% of income from government
  • Adventure Theatre Inc2% of income from government
  • Yeshiva High School for Girls Inc1% of income from government
  • Jewish Social Service Agency1% of income from government
  • Yeshiva of Greater Washington Inc1% of income from government
  • Hebrew Home of Greater Washington Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
47get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mayberg Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mayberg Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 338 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph