Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Clean Power Association

Acp is the voice of companies from across the clean power sector that are powering america's future & providing cost-effective solutions to the climate crisis while creating jobs, spurring massive investment in the u.s.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$246k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Environment$2.1MPublic Benefit$495kCommunity Improvement$246kArts & Culture$25kEmployment$11k
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $1,904,429 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,014,129 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $109,700 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.8M
$98,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$78M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE$246,429
CLEAN GRID ALLIANCE$220,000
SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION$200,000
REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION$185,000
ADVANCED POWER ALLIANCE$170,000
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION$150,000
ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY NEW YORK$135,000
TRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL COMMITTEE INC$100,000
SOUTHERN RENEWABLE ENERGY ASSOCIATION$98,000
RENEWABLE NORTHWEST PROJECT$95,000
UTILITY SCALE SOLAR ENERGY COALITION OF OHIO$75,000
MAREC ACTION$60,000
INTERWEST ENERGY ALLIANCE$55,000
RENEW NORTHEAST INC$40,000
FUTURE FORWARD USA ACTION DBA BLUE ROSE ACTION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAREC ACTION: $95k → 11%CLEAN GRID ALLIANCE: $183k → 7%CLEAN GRID ALLIANCE: $220k → 14%ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY NEW YORK: $135k → 14%ADVANCED POWER ALLIANCE: $170k → 10%PROJECT QUEST: $11k → 16%INTERWEST ENERGY ALLIANCE: $152k → 14%SOUTHERN RENEWABLE ENERGY ASSOCIATION: $98k → 17%TRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL COMMITTEE INC: $100k → 14%CONSERVATIVE ENERGY NETWORK: $60k → 16%RENEWABLE NORTHWEST PROJECT: $150k → 12%COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 9%RENEW NORTHEAST INC: $50k → 12%UTILITY SCALE SOLAR ENERGY COALITION OF OHIO: $75k → 15%ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY NEW YORK: $90k → 14%ADVANCED POWER ALLIANCE: $45k → 10%INTERWEST ENERGY ALLIANCE: $55k → 14%SOUTHERN RENEWABLE ENERGY ASSOCIATION: $30k → 17%FUTURE FORWARD USA ACTION DBA BLUE ROSE ACTION: $25k → 14%RENEWABLE NORTHWEST PROJECT: $95k → 12%RENEW NORTHEAST INC: $40k → 12%DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION: $150k → 14%EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE: $246k → 14%CLEAN POWER INSTITUTE: $50k → 14%REPUBLICAN STATE LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE: $25k → 14%SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION: $200k → 14%THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE SOCIETIES OF WASHINGTON DC: $25k → 14%REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION: $185k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
MI
NY
OR
OH
CT
MD
DE
NM
AR
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 8 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$1.7M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+47%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitEmploymentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RN
    RENEWABLE NORTHWEST PROJECT DBA RENEWABLE NORTHWEST
    2× · 2022–2024 · $245k · revenue +92%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY NEW YORK INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $225k · revenue +69%
  • TA
    THE ADVANCED POWER ALLIANCE
    2× · 2022–2024 · $215k · revenue +313%

Funded once

  • CE
    Conservative Energy Networkgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +26%
  • CP
    CLEAN POWER INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +103%
  • PQ
    PROJECT QUEST INC
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Advocates for Climate Innovation
Philanthropy
2
Clean Energy States Alliance Inc

Technical support to States clean energy agencies. CESA is a national nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing state and local efforts to implement smart clean energy policies, programs, technology innovation, and financing tools.

Environment
3
Clean Energy for America Inc

Clean Energy for Americas purpose is to engage with clean energy workers and advance the clean energy movement. CE4A highlights the feasibility and positive impact of a clean energy economy, educates policymakers and the general public on…

Environment
4
Clean Energy Group Inc

Clean energy research and advocacy. Clean Energy Group promotes effective clean energy policies, develops low carbon technology innovation strategies and promotes new financial tools to strengthen the economy and stabilize climate change.

Environment
5
Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources
6
Advanced Energy United Inc

To transform public policy to enable rapid growth of advanced energy businesses.

Community Improvement
7
Texas Clean Energy Coalition
8
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

9
California Energy Alliance

The California Energy Alliance (CEA) unites representatives of a broad range of organizations concerned about energy and the build environment. As a member-based organization, CEA works to improve California's energy future and migration…

Public Safety & Disaster
10
American Clean Power Association

Acp is the voice of companies from across the clean power sector that are powering america's future & providing cost-effective solutions to the climate crisis while creating jobs, spurring massive investment in the u.s. economy, & driving…

Community Improvement
11
Clean Energy Works

Clean energy works accelerates inclusive investments that open the clean energy economy to all.

Environment
12
Smart Electric Power Alliance

The Smart Electric Power Alliance (SEPA) is an educational nonprofit working to accelerate the transition to a clean, affordable, and resilient energy system for all.SEPA collaborates with over 1,000 member organizations across the…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alliance for Clean Energy New York Inc and the most unlike its peers is 58TH Presidential Inaugural Committee. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLEAN GRID ALLIANCE (FNA WIND ON THE WIRES) — $403,333 · EnvironmentCLEAN GRID ALLIANCE (FNA WIND ON THE WIRES)RENEWABLE NORTHWEST PROJECT DBA RENEWABLE NORTHWEST — $245,000 · EnvironmentRENEWABLE NORTHWEST PROJECT DBA RENEWABLE NORTH…ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY NEW YORK INC — $225,000 · EnvironmentALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY NEW YORK INCMAREC ACTION — $155,000 · EnvironmentMAREC ACTIONRENEW NORTHEAST INC — $90,000 · EnvironmentRENEW NORTHEAST INCConservative Energy Network — $59,500 · EnvironmentEDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE INC — $246,429 · Community ImprovementEDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE INCTHE ADVANCED POWER ALLIANCE — $215,000 · Community ImprovementTHE ADVANCED POWER ALLIANCEInterwest Energy Alliance — $207,000 · Community ImprovementInterwest Energy AllianceSOUTHERN RENEWABLE ENERGY ASSOCIATION — $128,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHERN RENEWABLE ENERGY ASSOC…SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION — $200,000 · OtherSECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENER…Republican Governors Association — $185,000 · OtherRepublican Governors Associati…DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION — $150,000 · OtherDEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATI…58TH PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURAL COMMITTEE — $100,000 · Other58TH PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURAL CO…UTILITY SCALE SOLAR ENERGY COALITION OF OHIO — $75,000 · OtherUTILITY SCALE SOLAR ENERGY COA…+2 more — $50,000 · Other+2 moreCLEAN POWER INSTITUTE — $49,635 · PhilanthropyFUTURE FORWARD USA ACTION — $25,000 · Public BenefitCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Public BenefitPROJECT QUEST INC — $11,100 · Employment
Environment$1,177,833Community Improvement$796,429Other$760,000Philanthropy$49,635Public Benefit$35,000Employment$11,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLEAN GRID ALLIANCE (FNA WIND ON THE WIRES) — $403,333 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetEDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE INC — $246,429 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRENEWABLE NORTHWEST PROJECT DBA RENEWABLE NORTHWEST — $245,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY NEW YORK INC — $225,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTHE ADVANCED POWER ALLIANCE — $215,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetInterwest Energy Alliance — $207,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetSECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMAREC ACTION — $155,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetSOUTHERN RENEWABLE ENERGY ASSOCIATION — $128,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetRENEW NORTHEAST INC — $90,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetConservative Energy Network — $59,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCLEAN POWER INSTITUTE — $49,635 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetFUTURE FORWARD USA ACTION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE S DBA THE GEORGIA STATE SOCIETY O — $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPROJECT QUEST INC — $11,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edison Electric Institute IncDC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edison Electric Institute Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Clean Power Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph