· Private foundation
A Chancefund Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $190k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DAVID M SCHWARZ ARCHITECTS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
| BROOKLYN GREENWAY INITIATIVE | $15,000 |
| EMMA'S TORCH LTD | $15,000 |
| MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK | $15,000 |
| HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD | $15,000 |
| BREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC | $15,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CAS INCORPORATED | $15,000 |
| THE POGIL PROJECT | $15,000 |
| ESSEX STREET ACADEMY PARENTS ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| FOOD EDUCATION FUND | $15,000 |
| ANNE SAXELBY LEGACY FUND INC | $15,000 |
| NEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTANCE GROUP INCORPORATED | $10,000 |
| PROJECT NADIYA INCORPORATED | $10,000 |
| EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND INC | $10,000 |
| ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BNBREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC8× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +37%
- ETEMMA'S TORCH LTD6× · 2019–2024 · $65k · revenue +98%
- HBHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD7× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +61%
Funded once
Vanderbilt Universitygraduatedone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +57%- TCTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICAgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $55k · revenue +26%
- SJST JOHN'S COLLEGEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $28k · revenue +40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
(see schedule o)
The new school's mission is to prepare our students to understand, contribute to, and succeed in a rapidly changing society, and thus make the world a better and more just place. (continued on schedule o)
The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…
School in the square ("s2") engages, educates and empowers adolescents to respond mindfully and creatively to life's opportunities and challenges. s2 is a place where students, families and educators are seen, heard, and inspired and where…
An engaged network of tech leaders working to foster a dynamic, diverse, and creative new york. we bring together new yorkers to support a successful technology ecosystem, attract and retain top-tier talent, and celebrate new york and the…
At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese-American Planning Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is David M Schwarz Architects Charitable Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds DAVID M SCHWARZ ARCHITECTS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
- Who funds GLSEN INC ↗
- Who funds EMMA'S TORCH LTD ↗
- Who funds HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD ↗
- Who funds ESSEX STREET ACADEMY PARENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds Friends of CAS ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds ANNE SAXELBY LEGACY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN GREENWAY INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE CHIMPS INC ↗
- Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
- Who funds SUGAR HILL CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ART AND STORYTELLING ↗
- Who funds Project Nadiya Incorporated ↗
- Who funds THE POGIL PROJECT ↗
- Who funds GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC ↗
- Who funds RETHINK FOOD NYC INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTERLINE LIBERTIES INC ↗
- Who funds SLOW FOOD CO-DENVER ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE ↗
- Who funds Orchestra of the Americas Group Inc ↗
- Who funds Peace Development Fund ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds Physicians For Reproductive Health ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTANCE GROUP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Research Foundation of the City University of New York · Altman Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization A Chancefund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- St John's College — 2% of income from government
- Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to A Chancefund Inc?
Find your warmest path to A Chancefund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.