Skip to content

Texas · Public charity

Rewild

Re:wild protects and restores the wild to build a thriving earth where all life flourishes.

$64M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
43
Itemized grants FY2025
18
Organizations funded FY2024
56%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$3.8M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$60,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$425,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 25
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
20
Total assets, FY2025
$74M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 56% of the organizations Rewild funded were first-time grantees, receiving 57% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $737k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentAnimalsEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving42$3.6M69%
FY202418$1.3M56%
FY20239$810k11%
FY202218$2.3M44%
FY202124$935k42%
FY202025$1.4M88%
FY20199$375k44%
FY20189$132k89%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$5.8MScience & Tech$2.9MPhilanthropy$2.6MAnimals$1.9MCommunity Improvement$750kEducation$125kFood & Nutrition$75kArts & Culture$50kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 98 grantees
All grantees of Rewild by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Oregon Desert Land Trust$829,634139%
Groundwork USA Inc$725,00025%
Santa Monica Mountains Fund$600,000226%
Treepeople Inc$500,00032%
Global Fishing Watch Inc$400,00041%
Turtle Conservancy$397,224222%
Environmental Leadership Program Inc$383,340311%
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation$315,00054%
Planet Women$303,00037%
Revive & Restore$300,00013%
Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy$300,00011%
Savanna Institute$294,9611n/a
Earth Innovation Institute$293,42322%
Austin Peay State University Foundation$263,25021%
Solutions Project Inc$250,00031%
National Arbor Day Foundation$213,50010%
Smithsonian Institution$201,74230%
Cat Action Treasury Inc$200,000217%
Wildlife Conservation Society$182,32030%
University of Washington$175,9493n/a
Colorado Plateau Foundation$160,00043%
Our Children's Trust$150,00022%
South Fork Natural History Society$150,00029%
Mongabay Org Corp$150,00021%
Global Conservation Network$148,00046%
The Climate Center$140,67514%
Southeast Alaska Indiginous Transboundary Commissi$135,000530%
American Forests$130,00010%
Pine Ridge Girls School Inc$125,00054%
Omaha Zoological Society$115,00020%
American Bird Conservancy$114,00030%
National Wildlife Federation$107,50030%
University of Washington Foundation$102,37610%
Oregon Natural Desert Association$100,6382n/a
Silvix Resources$100,000115%
Board of Regents of the University of California (Merced)$90,5531n/a
New River Conservancy$80,00013%
Conservation X Labs Inc$76,5401n/a
Quivira Coalition Inc$76,0001n/a
Re-Volv$75,00027%
The Regeneration Project$75,00024%
Defenders of Wildlife$75,00020%
Zero Foodprint$75,0001n/a
Mighty Earth Inc$75,0001n/a
Ndn Collective Inc$75,00020%
Nc State University$65,8551n/a
Conservation International Foundation$60,00010%
Colorado Cattlemen's Agricultural Land Trust$60,00010%
Landberry Limited$60,0001n/a
Meridian Institute$50,0391n/a
National Geographic Society$50,00010%
Comite Civico del Valle Inc$50,00012%
La Compost$50,00023%
Sequoia Forestkeeper$50,000230%
Utah Dine Bikeyah$50,00022%
Native Renewables Inc$50,00021%
Sustainable Forestry and Land Retention Network$50,0001n/a
Sos Children's Villages-Usa Inc$50,00011%
Groundwork Hudson Valley Inc$40,00013%
Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation$38,50010%
Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability$37,57111%
Carbon Cycle Institute$37,50015%
Appalachian Sustainable Development$35,0001n/a
University of Hawaii Foundation$35,00010%
San Antonio Zoological Society$32,50010%
Partnership for Southern Equity$31,9801n/a
Polaris Institute USA$30,0001n/a
The California Wildlife Center$30,00021%
White Buffalo Land Trust$30,0001n/a
Lemur Conservation Network$28,000219%
Amphibian Foundation$27,0002n/a
Home Range Wildlife Research$25,31425%
Urban Wood Economy Inc$25,00014%
Comite Civico del Valle$25,0001n/a
Grid Alternative Greater Los Angeles$25,0001n/a
Yellow Dog Community and Conservation Foundation$25,00013%
Partners for Conservationinc$25,00016%
Rural Coalition$25,00010%
Grid Alternatives Greater Los Angeles Inc$25,0001n/a
Stone Child College$20,35010%
Conservation Legacy$20,0001n/a
City of Kingsport Tennessee$20,0001n/a
Black Girl Environmentalist (Register Nation Fs)$20,0001n/a
Blue Backyard Inc$20,000116%
University of Central Florida$16,0001n/a
Regents of the University of Michigan$15,1001n/a
Whaleman International Ltd$12,00015%
Appalachian Trail Conservancy$10,00010%
Regents Univ of California$10,0001n/a
University of Texas$10,0001n/a
Chicago Horticultural Society$10,00010%
Alliance Earth$10,0001n/a
Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc$10,00010%
Duke University$9,78710%
African Aquatic Conservation Fund Inc$9,18013%
Warren Wilson College$8,00010%
Washington State University$7,5001n/a
Houston Zoo Inc$5,50010%

Where it is load-bearing

Rewild supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 4 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 69 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOregon Desert Land Trust: $829,634 over 1y, 39% of budgetGroundwork USA Inc: $725,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetSanta Monica Mountains Fund: $600,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetTreepeople Inc: $500,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGlobal Fishing Watch Inc: $400,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTurtle Conservancy: $397,224 over 2y, 22% of budgetEnvironmental Leadership Program Inc: $383,340 over 3y, 11% of budgetClimate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation: $315,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetPlanet Women: $303,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetRevive & Restore: $300,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSouthern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy: $300,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEarth Innovation Institute: $293,423 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetAustin Peay State University Foundation: $263,250 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSolutions Project Inc: $250,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetNational Arbor Day Foundation: $213,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSmithsonian Institution: $201,742 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCat Action Treasury Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $182,320 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Plateau Foundation: $160,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetOur Children's Trust: $150,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSouth Fork Natural History Society: $150,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetMongabay Org Corp: $150,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetGlobal Conservation Network: $148,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetThe Climate Center: $140,675 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetSoutheast Alaska Indiginous Transboundary Commissi: $135,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetAmerican Forests: $130,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPine Ridge Girls School Inc: $125,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetOmaha Zoological Society: $115,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $114,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNational Wildlife Federation: $107,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Washington Foundation: $102,376 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSilvix Resources: $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetNew River Conservancy: $80,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetRe-Volv: $75,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetThe Regeneration Project: $75,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNdn Collective Inc: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetConservation International Foundation: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Cattlemen's Agricultural Land Trust: $60,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNational Geographic Society: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetComite Civico del Valle Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLa Compost: $50,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetSequoia Forestkeeper: $50,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetUtah Dine Bikeyah: $50,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetNative Renewables Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSos Children's Villages-Usa Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGroundwork Hudson Valley Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNortheast Wilderness Trust Corporation: $38,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 69.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Leonardo Dicaprio FoundationCA38.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Leonardo Dicaprio Foundation · Patagoniaorg · The Nature Conservancy · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund · California Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Wilburforce Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Rewild with peer funders

About Rewild

How much does Rewild give?
Rewild reported 43 itemized grants totaling $3,815,997, out of $63,558,340 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 25 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Rewild fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (41%), Science & Tech (21%), Philanthropy (18%).
Who are Rewild's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Oregon Desert Land Trust ($830k), Groundwork USA Inc ($725k), Santa Monica Mountains Fund ($600k).
Does Rewild fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 56% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Rewild?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Leonardo Dicaprio Foundation, Patagoniaorg, The Nature Conservancy.
Where is Rewild based?
Rewild is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rewild’s filings →

More from the funding graph