Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

National Environmental Education and Training Foundation Inc

The national environmental education and training foundation, doing business as neef, is the nation's leading organization in lifelong environmental learning, creating opportunities for people to experience and learn about the environment (continued on schedule o)

$973k
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
23
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0166% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$1.1MRecreation & Sports$559kPhilanthropy$230kAnimals$187kYouth Development$175kArts & Culture$147kHuman Services$125kEducation$117kCommunity Improvement$104kOther$1.5M
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 40 grants below total $861,704 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $972,957 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $111,253 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $111k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $376k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $376k
$10,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONSERVATION LEGACY$164,996
THE FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK$75,000
SALMON VALLEY STEWARDSHIP$71,700
KENTUCKY STATE TREASURER - OFFICE OF KENTUCKY NATURE PRESERVES$63,875
DISCOVERY EDUCATION INC$48,500
LAND TRUST OF NORTH ALABAMA$40,000
BIRDS OF PREY NCA PARTNERSHIP$39,742
THE CREATE FOUNDATION$37,000
PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY$20,000
OREGON MILITARY DEPARTMENT$18,046
MOCKINGBIRD INCUBATOR$15,000
MONTANA AUDUBON$13,736
FORT LEAVENWORTH DFMWR$13,207
ENVIRONMENT FOR THE AMERICAS$10,400
SOUTH DOYLE MIDDLE SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BIRDS OF PREY NCA PARTNERSHIP: $40k → 8%BILINGUAL EDUCATION COLLECTIVE: $10k → 11%PHILADELPHIA FREEDOM VALLEY YMCA: $10k → 7%ROCHESTER ACCESSIBLE ADVENTURES: $20k → 14%MILITARY MOBILITY: $10k → 11%POINT BONITA YMCA: $10k → 8%BIRDS OF PREY NCA PARTNERSHIP: $15k → 8%BIRDS OF PREY NCA PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
OR
NV
WY
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of National Environmental Education and Training Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

National Environmental Education and Training Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 51 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

51 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
93

Total granted

$2.3M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+17%

Still filing today

80%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $565k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LAND TRUST OF NORTH ALABAMA INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $200k · revenue +3%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
    4× · 2020–2023 · $112k · revenue +81%
  • SOUTH YUBA RIVER CITIZENS LEAGUE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $85k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -20%
  • SC
    SANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $96k · revenue +110%
  • LO
    LOUISVILLE OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY IN
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust

The Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust leads and inspires action to conserve and enhance the landscape of the Mountains to Sound Greenway, ensuring a long-term balance between people and nature.

Environment
2
Glacier National Park Conservancy

The glacier national park conservancy works to preserve and protect glacier national park for future generations.

Recreation & Sports
3
The Forest Park Conservancy

To protect and restore the ecological health of forest park and marquam nature park, maintain and enhance their extensive trails networks, promote equitable access, and inspire diverse community appreciation and stewardship of these iconic…

Environment
4
Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy

The golden gate national parks conservancy (parks conservancy) serves as the nonprofit partner of the national park service, collaborating with the presidio trust, partners, donors, and the community to support the golden gate national…

Environment
5
Naturebridge

To connect young people to the wonder and science of the natural world, igniting self-discovery and inspiring stewardship of our planet.

Environment
6
The Wildlands Conservancy

The Wildlands Conservancy's dual mission is to preserve the beauty and biodiversity of the earth and to provide programs so that children may know the wonder and joy of nature.

Environment
7
Point Reyes National Seashore Association

The Official Partner to the Point Reyes National Seashore Since 1964, Point Reyes National Seashore Association focuses on three priorities: Youth Education & access, environmental conservation and building a broad community for the people…

Environment
8
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
9
Cuenca Los Ojos

Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.

Environment
10
Parks California

As california state parks' statutory non-profit partner, we have a clear mission - to help strengthen parks and inspire all people to experience these extraordinary places.

Environment
11
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
12
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Monica Mountains Fund and the most unlike its peers is Florida Three Rivers Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Independent K-12 SchoolsLocal History MuseumsCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Developmental Disabilities …Youth Sports Programs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%42%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/147
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,418

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 170 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
111/113
Grantees still filing
76/113
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DC PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $124,545 · OtherDC PUBLIC SCHOOLSSANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY — $95,542 · OtherSOUTH YUBA RIVER CITIZENS LEAGUE — $84,907 · OtherLOUISVILLE OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY IN — $75,000 · OtherCOLORADO NATIONAL MONUMENT ASSOCIATION — $67,368 · OtherCOMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY — $63,875 · OtherBIRDS OF PREY NCA PARTNERSHIP — $64,742 · Other+89 more — $1,314,036 · Other+89 moreTHE LAND TRUST OF NORTH ALABAMA INC — $199,500 · EnvironmentTHE LAND TRUST OF NORTH ALAB…SALMON VALLEY STEWARDSHIP INC — $71,700 · EnvironmentSALMON VALLEY STEWARDSHIP IN…TIMUCUAN PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $68,837 · EnvironmentTIMUCUAN PARKS FOUNDATION IN…SAN JOAQUIN RIVER PARKWAY & CONSERVATION TRUST — $64,750 · EnvironmentSAN JOAQUIN RIVER PARKWAY & …PALOS VERDES PENINSULA LAND CONSERVANCY — $62,500 · EnvironmentPALOS VERDES PENINSULA LAND …MOUNTAIN STUDIES INSTITUE — $53,873 · EnvironmentRock Creek Conservancy Inc — $51,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK — $41,598 · Environment+30 more — $471,887 · Environment+30 moreFRIENDS OF GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK — $111,640 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF GRE…SAN MATEO COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION — $57,376 · Recreation & SportsSAN MATEO COUN…SHENANDOAH NATIONAL PARK ASSOC INC — $56,300 · Recreation & SportsSHENANDOAH NAT…CRYSTAL COVE CONSERVANCY — $55,000 · Recreation & SportsCRYSTAL COVE C…PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY — $40,000 · Recreation & SportsPITTSBURGH PAR…TEANECK CREEK CONSERVANCY INC — $37,476 · Recreation & SportsTEANECK CREEK …THE ALLIANCE FOR FLORIDA'S NATIONAL PARKS INC — $30,884 · Recreation & SportsTHE ALLIANCE F…FRIENDS OF KENILWORTH AQUATIC GARDENS — $29,165 · Recreation & SportsCOLORADO CANYONS ASSOCIATION — $26,000 · Recreation & SportsPinnacles National Park Foundation Pinnacles Partnership — $25,717 · Recreation & SportsTRAIL ACCESS PROJECT — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsMONTANA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Recreation & Sports+5 more — $49,143 · Recreation & Sports+5 moreFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $165,000 · PhilanthropyCREATE FOUNDATION — $37,000 · PhilanthropyAMIGOS DE LOS RIOS — $19,965 · PhilanthropyGROW — $8,000 · PhilanthropyZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI — $100,000 · AnimalsROCKY MOUNTAIN BUTTERFLY CONSORTIUM — $60,250 · AnimalsENVIRONMENT FOR THE AMERICAS INC — $20,310 · AnimalsNATIONAL AQUARIUM INC — $6,500 · AnimalsCONSERVATION LEGACY — $164,996 · Youth DevelopmentREEL GUPPY OUTDOORS INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM — $25,093 · Arts & CultureROSIE THE RIVETER TRUST — $21,126 · Arts & CultureDISCOVERY CENTER GREAT LAKES — $20,000 · Arts & CulturePHILLIP AND PATRICIA FROST MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureATLANTIC CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Arts & CultureCabrillo National Monument Foundation — $9,740 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE CHICAGO RIVER — $8,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF HOMESTEAD NATIONAL HISTORIC PARK — $7,711 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,890,015Environment$1,085,645Recreation & Sports$558,701Philanthropy$229,965Animals$187,060Youth Development$174,996Arts & Culture$146,670

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE LAND TRUST OF NORTH ALABAMA INC — $199,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $165,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION LEGACY — $164,996 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK — $111,640 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY — $95,542 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTH YUBA RIVER CITIZENS LEAGUE — $84,907 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetLOUISVILLE OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY IN — $75,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSALMON VALLEY STEWARDSHIP INC — $71,700 over 1y, 14% of budgetTIMUCUAN PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $68,837 over 5y, 12% of budgetCOLORADO NATIONAL MONUMENT ASSOCIATION — $67,368 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN RIVER PARKWAY & CONSERVATION TRUST — $64,750 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetBIRDS OF PREY NCA PARTNERSHIP — $64,742 over 3y, 54% of budgetPALOS VERDES PENINSULA LAND CONSERVANCY — $62,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN BUTTERFLY CONSORTIUM — $60,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAN MATEO COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION — $57,376 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetSHENANDOAH NATIONAL PARK ASSOC INC — $56,300 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCRYSTAL COVE CONSERVANCY — $55,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMOUNTAIN STUDIES INSTITUE — $53,873 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetRock Creek Conservancy Inc — $51,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetCONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK — $41,598 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBig Thicket Association — $41,533 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetPITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY — $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTEANECK CREEK CONSERVANCY INC — $37,476 over 2y, 15% of budgetCREATE FOUNDATION — $37,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetC&O CANAL TRUST INC — $35,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetFriends of Saguaro National Park — $35,296 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFlorida Three Rivers Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc — $33,531 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR FLORIDA'S NATIONAL PARKS INC — $30,884 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetAMIGOS DE EL YUNQUE INC — $30,500 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF KENILWORTH AQUATIC GARDENS — $29,165 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetBuilders of Hope CDC — $28,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMISSISSIPPI PARK CONNECTION — $27,144 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORGAN MOUNTAINS-DESERT PEAKS — $27,071 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetCOLORADO CANYONS ASSOCIATION — $26,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetBAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM — $25,093 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK FOUNDATION INC — $25,083 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetCORAZON LATINO INC — $25,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetTrinity Park Conservancy — $24,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSanta Monica Mountains Fund — $22,495 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetRESOURCES FOR INDIAN STUDENT EDUCATION — $22,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetBay Area Outreach and Recreation Program — $21,880 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetROSIE THE RIVETER TRUST — $21,126 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCY — $21,034 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCraters of the Moon Natural History Asso — $20,775 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetENVIRONMENT FOR THE AMERICAS INC — $20,310 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRochester Accessible Adventures — $20,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetSOJOURNER TRUTH SCHOOL — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Park Foundat…National Fish and Wil…PatagoniaorgNational Forest Found…The Nature ConservancyRei Cooperative Actio…National Park Trust I…The Outdoor FoundationConservation Lands Fo…Western Conservation …Resources Legacy FundCommunity Initiatives
National Park FoundationDC64.9× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Park Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Patagoniaorg · National Forest Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · Rei Cooperative Action Fund · National Park Trust Inc · The Outdoor Foundation · Conservation Lands Foundation · Western Conservation Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund · Community Initiatives

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Environmental Education and Training Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Northwest Youth Corps — 100% of income from government
  • Mckenzie Watershed Alliance — 100% of income from government
  • Applegate Partnership Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Rock Creek Conservancy Inc — 60% of income from government
  • Florida Three Rivers Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc — 53% of income from government
  • Sunny Wolf Charter School — 26% of income from government
  • Hubbard Brook Research Foundation — 6% of income from government
  • Atlantic Center for the Arts Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Phillip and Patricia Frost Museum of Science Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation — 1% of income from government
  • National Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 170 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines