How much did CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC grant in FY2024?

CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC reported 7 grants totaling $233,536 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC based?

CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC is based in NY.

CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC

Organization's mission: the central park conservancy oversees all aspects of the care, maintenance and restoration of new york's most iconic public space, central park.

$234k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$94k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

governors

2020

downtown austinecologicalbalboavisitorsvan cortlandtaustin implementnature

2021

hudson rivernon-profitcpfgardensmosholu parklandparkland fompstreet

2022

icomosinternationalcommitteeglobalworldwidemonuments siteshistoric preservation

2023

conservationnatural

2024

food

2025

food

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $9k
$10k–50k5 grants · $121k
$50k–250k1 grant · $94k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$677M

Total assets

Largest grants

NYC DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION$93,893
THE PUBLIC THEATER$47,410
CENTRAL PARK MEDICAL UNIT INC$25,000
NEW YORKERS FOR PARKS$20,000
CITY PARKS ALLIANCE INC$18,333
NEW YORK CHAPTER AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS$10,400
THE CORBIN HILL FOOD PROJECT$9,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.5M · 9 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.5M

$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%

+58%

Still filing today

78%

91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Recreation & SportsEnvironmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CP
Central Park Medical Unit Inc
6× · 2018–2024 · $150k · revenue +63% · 28% of their budget
NY
New yorkers for Parks
6× · 2018–2024 · $133k · revenue +17%
City Parks Alliance Inc
7× · 2018–2024 · $101k · revenue +32%

Funded once

NY
NEW YORK CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
one grant, 2023 · $250k
NA
NATURAL AREAS CONSERVANCY
one grant, 2023 · $132k · revenue -14%
FF
FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC
one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Downtown Dallas Parks Conservancy

Community Improvement

Battery Park City Parks

The battery park city parks conservancy's mission is to manage, maintain, operate, repair, preserve and program activities to a world class standard for the residential parks, open space, and other public structures located on the 92 acre…

Recreation & Sports

Central Park Conservancy Inc

Organization's mission: the central park conservancy oversees all aspects of the care, maintenance and restoration of new york's most iconic public space, central park. this work allows the park's 843-acres to serve as a source of respite…

Recreation & Sports

Greenbelt Conservancy Inc

The Greenbelt Conservancy (the "Greenbelt"), the second of New York City's Flagship Parks, consists of over 2,800 acres of public and privatge land (greater than the combined acreage of Central Park and Prospect Park) in the center of…

Environment

Chicago Parks Foundation

The Chicago Parks Foundation ("CPF") seeks to preserve Chicago's public parks, enhance the park visitor experience, and build a community dedicated to conserving the parks for a healthier lifestyle and improved quality of life for our…

Recreation & Sports

Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp"), is the entity responsible for the planning, construction, maintenance and operation of brooklyn bridge park, an 85-acre sustainable waterfront park stretching 1.3 miles…

Recreation & Sports

Riverside Park Conservancy Inc

The mission of the conservancy is to restore, maintain, and improve riverside park

Environment

Randall's Island Park Alliance Inc

To work with the city of new york to sustain, maintain, develop and program randall's island park

—

City Park Conservancy

City park conservancy is a nonprofit organization formed to preserve and improve city park spaces for recreational, educational, cultural and beautification purposes.

Recreation & Sports

Carl Schurz Park Conservancy Inc

The mission of carl schurz park conservancy is to restore and beautify carl schurz park, complementing the efforts of the new york city department of parks and recreation. our goal is to enhance the public's enjoyment and involvement in…

Recreation & Sports

Memorial Park Conservancy Inc

The mission of the Memorial Park Conservancy (MPC) is to restore, preserve and enhance Memorial Park for the enjoyment of all Houstonians, today and tomorrow.

Environment

Bryant Park Corporation

Manage and maintain Bryant Park in Midtown Manhattan as a dynamic, clean and safe public space.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Parks Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/44

the rest of the field

10,118/120,716

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

39/40

Grantees still filing

30/40

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,208,976Arts & Culture$393,071Recreation & Sports$368,029Environment$272,380Health$150,000Philanthropy$125,000Community Improvement$33,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

City Parks Foundation IncNY28.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: City Parks Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Patagoniaorg · The Ralph E Ogden Foundation Inc · Leon Levy Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Nature Conservancy

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Central Park Medical Unit Inc.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~66 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +63% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 112516283 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Central Park Medical Unit Inc, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 66 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 28% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Central Park Conservancy Inc?

Find your warmest path to Central Park Conservancy Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Central Park Conservancy Inc?

More from the funding graph

CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Central Park Conservancy Inc?

More from the funding graph