Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

J-P Conte Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$11MHealth$2.6MArts & Culture$1.4MRecreation & Sports$1.2MEnvironment$630kAnimals$630kHousing & Shelter$455kInternational$305kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $112k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $760k
  • $250k+7 grants · $4.3M
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$91M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOOVER INSTITUTION$1,500,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$1,000,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$550,000
CPMC FOUNDATION - SUTTER HEALTH$416,667
SEO SCHOLARS SAN FRANCISCO$300,000
10000 DEGREES$250,000
SAN FRANCISCO CHALLENGE - DBA AMERICA ONE$250,000
NEIGHBORS FOR A BETTER SF$200,000
THE BRANSON SCHOOL$200,000
CHRISTIAN BROTHERS ACADEMY$100,000
LATINO ACTION FOUNDATION$100,000
PEPPERWOOD PRESERVE$60,000
ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH$50,000
UCSF FOUNDATION$50,000
BRAZIL FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%AASHA FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
NY
MA
NV
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
DC
LA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of J-P Conte Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

J-P Conte Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 25 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
29

Total granted

$13M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+5%

Still filing today

56%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $237k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 1D
    10000 DEGREES
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +101%
  • TB
    THE BRANSON SCHOOL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $845k · revenue +62%
  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $750k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO SPECIAL EVENTS COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue -97%
  • FT
    FUND TO CONSERVE US DIPLOMATIC TREASURES ABROAD
    one grant, 2022 · $400k · revenue -27%
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue +46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
3
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
4
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
5
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education
6
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

9
The University Foundation At Sacramento State

Raise private resources to advance the mission and priorities of the university and serve as ambassadors in the community. provide stewardship in the prudent investment of resources and ensure the integrity of the foundation through…

Education
10
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
11
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
12
San Jose State University Research Foundation

As an integral member of the san jose state university community, the san jose state university research foundation provides an entrepreneurial framework through which local, state and federal agencies, businesses and private foundations…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Burning Man Project and the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Government Accountability R…Community FoundationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsYmca Community CentersPregnancy Support ServicesJewish Community FederationsChristian Youth CampsClassical Music EnsemblesYouth Sports Booster Organi…South Asian Cultural and Sp…Environmental Advocacy Orga…Affordable Housing Developm…Education Equity LeadershipWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Public University Foundatio…Land Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%5%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr11%25%35–55yr13%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%4%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr17%35%20–35yr11%22%35–55yr13%31%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/45
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,933

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
25/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL — $2,550,000 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOLCPMC FOUNDATION - SUTTER HEALTH — $1,666,668 · OtherCPMC FOUNDATION - SUTTER HEALTHSEO SCHOLARS SAN FRANCISCO — $748,500 · OtherSEO SCHOLARS SAN FRANCISCOPHSSPCA — $539,998 · OtherPHSSPCAUS SAILING FOUNDATION — $500,000 · OtherUS SAILING FOUNDATIONCHRISTIAN BROTHERS ACADEMY — $400,000 · OtherNEIGHBORS FOR A BETTER SF — $300,000 · Other+30 more — $1,596,000 · Other+30 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $2,000,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD J…10000 DEGREES — $1,200,000 · Education10000 DEGREESUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $1,010,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIATHE BRANSON SCHOOL — $845,000 · EducationTHE BRANSON SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $750,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDAT…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $520,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONThe American Lyceum — $420,000 · EducationThe American LyceumCOLGATE UNIVERSITY — $370,000 · Education+4 more — $550,000 · Education+4 moreSAN FRANCISCO SPECIAL EVENTS COMMITTEE — $500,000 · Arts & CultureFUND TO CONSERVE US DIPLOMATIC TREASURES ABROAD — $400,000 · Arts & CultureSOMArts — $75,000 · Arts & CultureFlux Foundation — $50,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $43,000 · Arts & CultureSan Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne — $500,000 · Recreation & SportsSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $150,000 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $21,500 · Recreation & SportsPEPPERWOOD FOUNDATION — $510,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $70,000 · EnvironmentTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $250,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $6,000 · PhilanthropyPAN AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $220,000 · InternationalBRAZIL FOUNDATION — $25,000 · International
Other$8,301,166Education$7,665,000Arts & Culture$1,068,000Recreation & Sports$671,500Environment$580,000Philanthropy$256,000International$245,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $2,000,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget10000 DEGREES — $1,200,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $1,010,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRANSON SCHOOL — $845,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $750,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $520,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPEPPERWOOD FOUNDATION — $510,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetSan Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne — $500,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SPECIAL EVENTS COMMITTEE — $500,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetThe American Lyceum — $420,000 over 3y, 86% of budgetFUND TO CONSERVE US DIPLOMATIC TREASURES ABROAD — $400,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY — $370,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $220,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZEN FILM INC — $200,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $150,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetYES IN MY BACK YARD — $150,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER — $90,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetSOMArts — $75,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES INC — $60,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSpecial Operations - Finding Kids — $50,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetFlux Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetTHE CRUCIBLE — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAKASHINGA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AASHA FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetBURNING MAN PROJECT — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRAZIL FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Rebels — $20,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetFive Ton Crane — $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR STUDENT COMMUNICATIONINC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATRE ASPEN — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE ROLLS ON FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEAGLE ISLAND INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTeam Hydro Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRockit Live Foundation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA21× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · East Bay Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Marin Community Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization J-P Conte Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to J-P Conte Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to J-P Conte Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph