Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rodan Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
56
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$4.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Philanthropy$25MReligion$10.0MEnvironment$4.5MEducation$3.6MInternational$3.4MHuman Services$3.3MArts & Culture$2.0MCommunity Improvement$1.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $312k
  • $50k–250k34 grants · $3.5M
  • $250k+7 grants · $7.0M
$95,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$83M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
New Venture Fund$4,277,503
Hopewell Fund$829,000
Wilshire Boulevard Temple$730,090
Urban Adamah$355,000
The Hammer Museum$300,000
Gather Inc$300,000
Service Year Exchange$250,000
United States Veterans Initiative$200,000
Aspen Art Museum$200,000
URJ Camp Newman$200,000
America-Israel Democracy Coalition$150,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy$150,000
JCC Association of North America$125,000
University of Southern California$125,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FMW Nonprofit Solutions: $101k → 11%The Jewish Peoplehood Alliance Inc: $70k → 11%FMW Nonprofit Solutions: $50k → 11%worldwidewomen foundation: $1k → 8%Tides Center: $155k → 11%Jewish Alliance Inc: $70k → 11%FMW Nonprofit Solutions: $50k → 11%The Jewish Peoplehood Alliance Inc: $70k → 11%Jewish Community Center Of The East Bay: $100k → 10%Jewish Community Center Of The East Bay: $100k → 10%jewish community center of east bay: $92k → 10%jewish community center of east bay: $20k → 10%Impact Cubed: $20k → 11%JCC Association of North America: $125k → 17%JCC Association of North America: $125k → 17%Project Glimmer: $10k → 10%Project Glimmer: $5k → 10%Project Glimmer: $5k → 10%GrowGood: $45k → 14%GrowGood: $45k → 14%GrowGood: $45k → 14%GrowGood: $35k → 14%United States Veterans Initiative: $200k → 14%US VETS: $75k → 14%United States Veterans Initiative: $75k → 14%United states veterans initiative: $75k → 14%United States Veterans Initiative: $75k → 14%United states veterans initiative: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MN
NY
MA
NV
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$31M · 76 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against -10% for the ones you funded once.

76 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
48

Total granted

$31M
$3.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-10%

Still filing today

72%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $947k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalArts & CultureReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HEAD ROYCE SCHOOL
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1.7M · revenue +15%
  • GI
    GATHER INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +73%
  • TJ
    TAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $848k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • HT
    Hillel The Foundation of Jewish Campus Life
    one grant, 2020 · $525k
  • BH
    BERKELEY HILLEL
    one grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue -36%
  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue +40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
3
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
4
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
5
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
6
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
7
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
8
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
9
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
10
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
11
Brown Hillel Foundation

Brown risd hillel encourages and supports a diversity of students as they explore, develop and deepen their jewish identities. we are committed to having judaism serve as a source of meaning and growth during their time on college hill and…

—
12
Clal-the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership Inc

A leading advocate for pluralism and diversity, clal offers jewish wisdom that enhances public life, deepens civic engagement and cultivates personal growth.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is Heart of a Nation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Local Food System Organizat…Community College Foundatio…Women & Girls Leadership De…Military Veterans SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesCancer Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsJewish Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%60%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%10%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/119
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,446

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
97/97
Grantees still filing
59/97
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW VENTURE FUND — $20,324,335 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUNDUrban Adamah — $4,467,000 · EnvironmentUrban Adamah+1 more — $270,000 · EnvironmentWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE — $2,225,180 · OtherWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLETHE HEAD ROYCE SCHOOL — $1,711,023 · OtherTHE HEAD ROYCE SCHOOLOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $755,000 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $650,000 · OtherUPSTART BAY AREA — $902,760 · OtherSERVICE YEAR EXCHANGE INC — $1,000,000 · OtherSERVICE YEAR EXCHANGE INC+84 more — $11,399,205 · Other+84 moreJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $2,275,907 · PhilanthropyJEWISH CO…HOPEWELL FUND — $1,647,629 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL …BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE — $798,238 · PhilanthropyBEND THE …+11 more — $584,100 · Philanthropy+11 moreGATHER INC — $1,015,000 · ReligionTAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $847,900 · ReligionMOISHE HOUSE — $609,682 · ReligionJEWBELONG INC — $560,800 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $500,000 · ReligionHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC — $450,000 · ReligionJOIN FOR JUSTICE INC — $320,000 · Religion+2 more — $30,005 · ReligionWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $750,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $630,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $558,000 · InternationalBUILDON INC — $250,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $175,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel — $150,000 · InternationalTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA — $120,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $120,000 · International+3 more — $31,000 · InternationalREUT USA — $780,000 · Arts & CultureASPEN ART MUSEUM — $712,750 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $300,000 · Arts & CultureSUKKAT SHALOM INC — $260,000 · Arts & CultureTkiya Music Inc — $150,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FILM FOUNDATION — $115,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $100,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $60,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE — $575,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY — $312,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA — $250,000 · Human ServicesENTER THE JEWISH PEOPLEHOOD ALLIANCE INC — $210,000 · Human ServicesFMW NONPROFIT SOLUTIONS — $200,500 · Human ServicesGROWGOOD INC — $170,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER — $154,500 · Human Services+3 more — $41,000 · Human Services
Environment$25,061,335Other$18,643,168Philanthropy$5,305,874Religion$4,333,387International$2,784,000Arts & Culture$2,477,750Human Services$1,913,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $20,324,335 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetUrban Adamah — $4,467,000 over 7y, 47% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $2,275,907 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HEAD ROYCE SCHOOL — $1,711,023 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $1,647,629 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGATHER INC — $1,015,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetSERVICE YEAR EXCHANGE INC — $1,000,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetUPSTART BAY AREA — $902,760 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetTAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $847,900 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE — $798,238 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetREUT USA — $780,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $755,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $750,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetASPEN ART MUSEUM — $712,750 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $650,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $630,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE — $609,682 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE — $575,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJEWBELONG INC — $560,800 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $558,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $550,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBERKELEY HILLEL — $500,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $500,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC — $450,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $390,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJEWS OF COLOR INITIATIVE — $330,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetJOIN FOR JUSTICE INC — $320,000 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY — $312,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $300,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWilderness Torah — $270,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetSUKKAT SHALOM INC — $260,000 over 4y, 74% of budgetBUILDON INC — $250,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA — $250,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN LAW SCHOOL — $240,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $225,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENTER THE JEWISH PEOPLEHOOD ALLIANCE INC — $210,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetFMW NONPROFIT SOLUTIONS — $200,500 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetIsrael 21c — $195,000 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetInstitute for Jewish & Community Research DBA Bechol Lashon — $188,330 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $175,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGROWGOOD INC — $170,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetM2 THE INSTITUTE FOR EXPERIENTIAL JEWISH EDUCATION — $170,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $154,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREPAIR THE WORLD — $150,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLife Learning Academy — $150,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTkiya Music Inc — $150,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetAMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION — $150,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Urban Adamah ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
  • Who funds THE HEAD ROYCE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds GATHER INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVICE YEAR EXCHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds UPSTART BAY AREA ↗
  • Who funds TAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds REUT USA ↗
  • Who funds OSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOISHE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds JEWBELONG INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds HONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds JEWS OF COLOR INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds JOIN FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY ↗
  • Who funds ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Wilderness Torah ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Fede…The Shimon Ben Joseph…The Jewish Community …Jewish Community Foun…Koret FoundationUnited Jewish Appeal-…Jewish Communal FundJohn Pritzker Family …Combined Jewish Phila…Jewish Federation Cou…Charles and Lynn Schu…Jewish Community Fede…
Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA72.7× affinity41 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · The Jewish Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Koret Foundation · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · John Pritzker Family Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of the Greater East Bay

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rodan Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rodan Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rodan Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 146 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines