· Private foundation
Marks Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $214k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.5M
- $250k+5 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EAST COAST ASSISTANCE DOGS INC | $300,000 |
| WE CARE SOLAR | $250,000 |
| THE V FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| PROJECT MUSIC HEALS US INC | $250,000 |
| BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC | $250,000 |
| PROJECT MUSIC HEALS US INC | $200,000 |
| EARTHENABLE | $150,000 |
| TAHOE EXPEDITION ACADEMY INC | $150,000 |
| REALIZE IMPACT | $150,000 |
| GIVE2ASIA | $104,000 |
| BLACK MUSIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP INCUBATOR | $100,000 |
| REALIZE IMPACT | $100,000 |
| NEO PHILANTHROPY INC | $100,000 |
| COLLEGE TRACK | $100,000 |
| HONEYWELL ARTS ACADEMY INC | $90,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TVTHE V FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +216%
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION2× · 2021–2022 · $1.5M · revenue +113%
- WCWE CARE SOLAR4× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +121%
Funded once
- VFV Foundation - Don't ever Give Upone grant, 2022 · $504k
- RSRick Sharp Alzheimers Foundationone grant, 2021 · $250k
- SSSPUR - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PLANNING AND URBAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…
The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Venture Fund and the most unlike its peers is Black Music Entrepreneurship Incubator. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WE CARE SOLAR ↗
- Who funds PROJECT MUSIC HEALS US INC ↗
- Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds THE VISCARDI CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AERIAL RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
- Who funds EAST COAST ASSISTANCE DOGS INC ↗
- Who funds BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds SPUR - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PLANNING AND URBAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Realize Impact ↗
- Who funds RICK SHARP ALZ FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLASSICAL RECORDING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE HONEYWELL ARTS ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds THE HONEYWELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TAHOE EXPEDITION ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds EARTHENABLE INC ↗
- Who funds POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds THE HEAD ROYCE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
- Who funds SIMISLEIGHS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE JUNIPER FUND ↗
- Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
- Who funds Black Music Entrepreneurship Incubator ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Spur Community Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Springcreek Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Argyros Family Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marks Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- From the Top Inc — 6% of income from government
- Western Connecticut Youth Orchestra Inc — 3% of income from government
- Project Music Heals Us Inc — 2% of income from government
- Berklee College of Music Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Marks Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Marks Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.