Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Illinois · Nonprofit

PRESBYTERIAN HOMES

PRESBYTERIAN HOMES (Illinois) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $113,747 to it, the largest being Lasater Family Charitable Trust ($82,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$116M
Revenue FY2025
6
Funders on record
$114k
Grants received
$135M
Net assets
4/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%

Against its field

PRESBYTERIAN HOMES runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 155 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin13% · top quartile
Months of reserve4.7mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 155 human services nonprofits over $100M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($78M) Expenses 100 ($63M) Net assets 100 ($65M)2018 Revenue 91 ($70M) Expenses 118 ($74M) Net assets 135 ($88M)2019 Revenue 104 ($81M) Expenses 123 ($77M) Net assets 135 ($87M)2020 Revenue 114 ($88M) Expenses 132 ($83M) Net assets 111 ($72M)2021 Revenue 119 ($93M) Expenses 133 ($84M) Net assets 160 ($103M)2022 Revenue 115 ($89M) Expenses 137 ($86M) Net assets 165 ($107M)2023 Revenue 125 ($97M) Expenses 152 ($96M) Net assets 150 ($97M)2024 Revenue 144 ($112M) Expenses 155 ($98M) Net assets 181 ($118M)2025 Revenue 149 ($116M) Expenses 159 ($100M) Net assets 208 ($135M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (149)Expenses (159)Net assets (208)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 2% · 2022 0% · 2025 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

2% of PRESBYTERIAN HOMES’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (20% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 261 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$15M
17
$3.8M
18
$3.5M
19
$5.2M
20
$9.1M
21
$2.5M
22
$779k
23
$14M
24
$15M
25
4.7
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income fell $15k → $8k.

1 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $27M from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Geneva Foundation of Presbyterian Homes). These are real filings, and they are not money PRESBYTERIAN HOMES raised.

From the IRS filings of PRESBYTERIAN HOMES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PRESBYTERIAN HOMES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

72%
largest funder
90%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 83% · 2021 51% · 2022 80% · 2023 69%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

89% of PRESBYTERIAN HOMES's grant income comes from Illinois funders.

IL
MI
NY

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Illinois out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $520 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like PRESBYTERIAN HOMES

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Illinois

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

84% of spending goes to programs.

Program 84%Management 16%Fundraising 0%

Governance

16
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

89%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

IL

Part of a family of 7 related entities

  • Lake Forest Place LLC · disregarded
  • Ten Twenty Grove · disregarded
  • The Moorings of Arlington Heights LLC · disregarded
  • Presbyterian Homes Manager LLC · disregarded
  • Presbyterian Homes Outpatient Rehab Agency LLC · disregarded

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PRESBYTERIAN HOMES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES?
PRESBYTERIAN HOMES (Illinois) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $113,747 to it, the largest being Lasater Family Charitable Trust ($82,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PRESBYTERIAN HOMES have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $113,747 in grants to PRESBYTERIAN HOMES, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PRESBYTERIAN HOMES?
Lasater Family Charitable Trust is the largest funder on record, with $82,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PRESBYTERIAN HOMES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing