How much did FOUNDATION FOR LONG TERM CARE INC grant in FY2021?

FOUNDATION FOR LONG TERM CARE INC reported 52 grants totaling $1,232,173 in its FY2021 IRS filing.

Where is FOUNDATION FOR LONG TERM CARE INC based?

FOUNDATION FOR LONG TERM CARE INC is based in NY.

FOUNDATION FOR LONG TERM CARE INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

FOUNDATION FOR LONG TERM CARE INC

To improve, by organizing, conducting, sponsoring and promoting research and educational programming, the way care for an aging society is delivered.

$1.2M

Granted FY2021

Grants

Communities

$26k

Largest

01What you fund

0166% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2021.

Health$1.3MHousing & Shelter$194kHuman Services$116kPhilanthropy$66kOther$830k

02FY2021 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

Under $10k10 grants · $90k
$10k–50k42 grants · $1.1M

$25,600

Median grant

States reached

$771k

Total assets

Largest grants

LEWIS COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL- NURSING HOME UNIT$25,600
RUTLAND NURSING HOME$25,600
SAINT MARY'S CENTER INC$25,600
VAN RENSSELAER MANOR$25,600
OUR LADY OF PEACE INC$25,600
SHAKER PLACE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER$25,600
JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER WESTCHESTER DBA THE NEW JEWISH HO$25,600
THE HOME FOR THE AGED OF THE LITTLESISTERS OF THE POOR DBA QUEEN OF PEACE R$25,600
ANDRUS ON HUDSON$25,600
T FRANKLIN WILLIAMS MD FOUNDATION DBA MONROE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL$25,600
WILLOW POINT REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER$25,600
THE HEBREW HOME FOR THE AGED AT RIVERDALE DBA RIVERSPRING ASSISTED LIVING$25,600
SOLDIERS AND SAILORS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL EXTENDED CARE UNIT$25,600
THE PARK REHAB AND SKILLED NURSING$25,600
VALLEY HEALTH SERVICES INC$25,600

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.0M · 24 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.0M

$795k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%

+13%

Still filing today

100%

79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $634k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WF
WESTSIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC DBA WSFSSH WEST
2× · 2020–2021 · $83k · revenue +2%
RN
RUTLAND NURSING HOME
2× · 2020–2021 · $56k · revenue +90%
JH
JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER WESTCHESTER DBA THE NEW JEWISH HO
2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +5%

Funded once

IG
ISABELLA GERIATRIC CENTER INC
one grant, 2020 · $38k
TS
THE SCHULMAN AND SCHACHNE INSTITUTE FOR NURSING REHABILITATION INC
one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +13%
JH
JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN DBA THE NEW JEWISH HOME MANHATTAN
one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Visiting Nurse Service of New York Home

To improve the health and well-being of people through high-qualty, cost-effective healthcare in the home and community.

Health

Nursing Sisters Home Care Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health

Metropolitan Jewish Home Care Inc

To provide certified home care and care management services.

Health

St Joseph's Medical Pc

To provide health care services

Health

Heritage House Nursing Center Inc

To provide long-term care

Health

Jewish Home Lifecare Community Services

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

International

Hebrew Home & Hospital

To provide quality health care to senior adults in the greater hartford area.

Health

Hebrew Health Care Inc

Provision of exceptional health care & aging services tailored to each individual.

Health

Ncr At Home Health and Wellness

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—

National Church Residences At Home

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—

National Church Residences At Home

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—

Bon Secours New York Health System Affiliated Group

Nursing care and multi-family housing project for the elderly and handicapped.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brooklyn United Methodist Church Home and the most unlike its peers is The Rosalind and Joseph Gurwin Jewish. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/77

the rest of the field

7,865/86,029

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

69 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

67/69

Grantees still filing

42/69

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$1,266,080Other$830,065Housing & Shelter$194,215Human Services$115,500Philanthropy$66,315

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Hospital Fund of New YorkNY24.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Hospital Fund of New York · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Herkimer And · Field Hall Foundation · Capital District Physicians' Health · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo · The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FOUNDATION FOR LONG TERM CARE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: T FRANKLIN WILLIAMS MD FOUNDATION DBA MONROE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 223086266 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on T FRANKLIN WILLIAMS MD FOUNDATION DBA MONROE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Foundation for Long Term Care Inc?

Find your warmest path to Foundation for Long Term Care Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FOUNDATION FOR LONG TERM CARE INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

69 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Foundation for Long Term Care Inc?

More from the funding graph

FOUNDATION FOR LONG TERM CARE INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

69 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Foundation for Long Term Care Inc?

More from the funding graph