Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Foundation for Long Term Care Inc

To improve, by organizing, conducting, sponsoring and promoting research and educational programming, the way care for an aging society is delivered.

$1.2M
Granted FY2021
52
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2021.

Health$2.2MHousing & Shelter$172kHuman Services$107kReligion$12k
02FY2021 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 52 grants below total $1,157,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,232,173 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $74,573 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k10 grants · $90k
  • $10k–50k42 grants · $1.1M
$25,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$771k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHEMUNG COUNTY NURSING FACILITY$25,600
ST JOHNLAND NURSING CENTER INC$25,600
LEWIS COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL- NURSING HOME UNIT$25,600
SHAKER PLACE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER$25,600
HUNTINGTON LIVING CENTER$25,600
DR SUSAN SMITH MCKINNEY NURSING$25,600
SCHUYLER HOSPITAL AND LTC UNIT$25,600
THE PINES HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER - MACHIAS CAMPUS$25,600
THE PARK REHAB AND SKILLED NURSING$25,600
WILLOW POINT REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER$25,600
T FRANKLIN WILLIAMS MD FOUNDATION DBA MONROE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL$25,600
OUR LADY OF PEACE INC$25,600
HIGHPOINTE ON MICHIGAN HEALTHCARE FACILITY$25,600
THE HOME FOR THE AGED OF THE LITTLESISTERS OF THE POOR DBA QUEEN OF PEACE R$25,600
SOLDIERS AND SAILORS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL EXTENDED CARE UNIT$25,600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $154k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VASSAR-WARNER HOME: $22k → 9%ISABELLA GERIATRIC CENTER INC: $38k → 20%PRESBYTERIAN RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY: $11k → 16%ST JOHN'S HOME FOUNDATION DBA ST JOHN'S HEALTH CARE CORPORATION: $30k → 14%TRUSTEES OF THE MASONIC HALL AND ASYLUM FUND DBA MASONIC CARE COMMUNITY OF: $23k → 16%VISTA ON 5TH CORP: $22k → 17%VISTA ON 5TH CORP: $9k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 24 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
48

Total granted

$1.0M
$795k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $634k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RN
    RUTLAND NURSING HOME INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $56k · revenue +67%
  • JH
    JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER WESTCHESTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +16%
  • TS
    THE SILVERCREST CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IG
    ISABELLA GERIATRIC CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $38k · revenue +27%
  • TR
    THE ROSALIND AND JOSEPH GURWIN JEWISH GERIATRIC CENTER OF LONG ISLAND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +33%
  • MH
    MENORAH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED AND INFIRM
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Home Care Inc

Mjhs home care is a not-for-profit, certified home health agency (chha), committed to providing skilled nursing and rehabilitation services for individuals recuperating at home from an acute episode, often elderly and at-risk members of…

Health
2
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
3
Ncr At Home Health and Wellness

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
4
Nursing Sisters Home Care Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
6
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
7
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
8
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
9
St Joseph's Medical Pc

We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.

Health
10
Saint Mary Home Incorporated

We, mercy community health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming presence within our communities. saint mary home is a member of mercy community health and trinity health.

—
11
Jewish Home of Central New York Senior Apartments Inc

Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…

Housing & Shelter
12
Heritage House Nursing Center Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. heritage house nursing center is a member of st. peter's health…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brooklyn United Methodist Church Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr20%25%20–35yr12%25%35–55yr14%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%2%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr20%23%20–35yr12%33%35–55yr14%38%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/79
the rest of the field
11%
9,528/89,585

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/72
Grantees still filing
47/72
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale — $74,100 · HealthThe Hebrew Home for Aged at RiverdaleRUTLAND NURSING HOME INC — $55,600 · HealthJEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER WESTCHESTER — $49,600 · HealthECMC FOUNDATION INC — $49,600 · HealthTHE SILVERCREST CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION — $49,600 · Health+44 more — $1,038,780 · Health+44 moreOUR LADY OF PEACE INC — $42,600 · OtherOUR LADY OF PEACE INCJAMAICA HOSPITAL NURSING HOME COMPANY INC — $34,600 · OtherCHASE MEMORIAL NURSING HOME AND REHAB — $25,600 · OtherWILLOW POINT REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER — $25,600 · OtherTHE HOME FOR THE AGED OF THE LITTLESISTERS OF THE POOR DBA QUEEN OF PEACE R — $25,600 · OtherDR SUSAN SMITH MCKINNEY NURSING — $25,600 · OtherST JOSEPH'S HOME — $25,600 · OtherSCHUYLER HOSPITAL AND LTC UNIT — $25,600 · OtherLEWIS COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL- NURSING HOME UNIT — $25,600 · OtherTHE PINES HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER - MACHIAS CAMPUS — $25,600 · OtherTHE PARK REHAB AND SKILLED NURSING — $25,600 · OtherCLIFTON SPRINGS HOSPITAL AND CLINIC EXTENDED CARE — $25,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $25,600 · OtherCHEMUNG COUNTY NURSING FACILITY — $25,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $25,600 · OtherOUR LADY OF PEACE NURSING CARE RESIDENCE — $25,600 · OtherSHAKER PLACE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER — $25,600 · OtherLIVINGSTON COUNTY CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION — $25,600 · OtherHIGHPOINTE ON MICHIGAN HEALTHCARE FACILITY — $25,600 · Other+18 more — $228,465 · Other+18 moreWEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $82,500 · Housing & ShelterVillage Housing Development Fund Corporation — $30,500 · Housing & ShelterEGER HARBOR HOUSE INC — $30,500 · Housing & ShelterJEWISH HOME LIFECARE UNIVERSITY AVENUE ASSISTED LIVING INC — $28,215 · Housing & ShelterISLAND REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER — $12,000 · Housing & ShelterCAMPHILL GHENT INC — $10,500 · Housing & ShelterISABELLA GERIATRIC CENTER INC — $38,000 · Human ServicesVISTA ON 5TH CORP — $30,500 · Human ServicesST JOHN'S HOME FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesTRUSTEES OF MASONIC HALL AND ASYLUM FUND — $23,000 · Human ServicesVASSAR-WARNER HOME — $21,500 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY — $10,500 · Human ServicesT Franklin Williams MD Foundation Inc The Monroe Community Hospital Foundation — $55,600 · PhilanthropyMERCY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $10,715 · Philanthropy
Health$1,317,280Other$740,865Housing & Shelter$194,215Human Services$153,500Philanthropy$66,315

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $82,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale — $74,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRUTLAND NURSING HOME INC — $55,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetT Franklin Williams MD Foundation Inc The Monroe Community Hospital Foundation — $55,600 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetJEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER WESTCHESTER — $49,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetECMC FOUNDATION INC — $49,600 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE SILVERCREST CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION — $49,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAPTIST HEALTH NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $42,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUR LADY OF PEACE INC — $42,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORWEGIAN CHRISTIAN HOME AND HEALTH CENTER — $42,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAPIN HOME FOR THE AGING — $40,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBETHEL SPRINGVALE NURSING HOME INC D/B/A BETHEL NURSING AND REHABILITATION — $40,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST LUKES HOME RESIDENTIAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY INC — $39,850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISABELLA GERIATRIC CENTER INC — $38,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC — $37,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITY HOSPITAL OF ROCHESTER — $37,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGENESEE VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN NURSING CENTER — $37,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOELLKOPF HEALTH CENTER INC — $37,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBROOKLYN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH HOME INC — $37,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST MARY'S CENTER INC — $36,315 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJAMAICA HOSPITAL NURSING HOME COMPANY INC — $34,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVillage Housing Development Fund Corporation — $30,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEGER HARBOR HOUSE INC — $30,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetVISTA ON 5TH CORP — $30,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ROSALIND AND JOSEPH GURWIN JEWISH GERIATRIC CENTER OF LONG ISLAND INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENORAH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED AND INFIRM — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMSTERDAM NURSING HOME CORPORATION (1992) — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SCHULMAN AND SCHACHNE INSTITUTE FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S HOME FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetPARKER JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HOME LIFECARE UNIVERSITY AVENUE ASSISTED LIVING INC — $28,215 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetValley Health Services Inc — $25,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOLDIERS & SAILORS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF YATES COUNTY INC — $25,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTINGTON NURSING HOME INC — $25,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JOSEPH'S HOME — $25,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JOHNLAND NURSING CENTER INC — $25,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGENEVA NURSING HOME INC — $25,600 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetST PATRICK'S HOME FOR THE AGED AND INFIRM — $25,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOBBLE HILL HEALTH CENTER INC — $24,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF MASONIC HALL AND ASYLUM FUND — $23,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRISTOL HOME INC — $21,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetVASSAR-WARNER HOME — $21,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMSTERDAM HOUSE CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC — $21,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROCHESTER GENERAL LONG TERM CARE — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED HOME FOR AGED HEBREWS — $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST CAMILLUS RESIDENTIAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKATHERINE LUTHER RESIDENTIAL HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $17,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mother Cabrini Health…United Hospital Fund …JM McDonald Foundatio…The Community Foundat…National Council on A…Field Hall FoundationCapital District Phys…Finger Lakes Performi…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…
Mother Cabrini Health Foundation IncNY28.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · United Hospital Fund of New York · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Herkimer and Oneida Counties Inc · National Council on Aging Inc · Field Hall Foundation · Capital District Physicians' Health Plan Inc · Finger Lakes Performing Provider System Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foundation for Long Term Care Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    50report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $7k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines