Skip to content

Illinois · Nonprofit

GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES

GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES (Illinois) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,714,210 to it, the largest being THE GRAINGER FOUNDATION INC ($3,086,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$9.0M
Funders on record
15
Grants received
$3.7M
Net assets
$179M
10/15 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 17%
01What it does

What Geneva Foundation of Presbyterian Homes does

Mission

The geneva foundation transforms lives by enriching presbyterian living and westminster place communities through generous and responsible philanthropy.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Geneva foundation's primary exempt purpose is to provide financial support for the charitable programs of presbyterian living and westminster place. Specifically, the fellowship fund helps distinguish the character of presbyterian living and westminster place. Through the fellowship fund, geneva foundation ensures that no resident will be asked to leave the community due to inability to pay. It extends medical and supportive services to maintain the residents' security, health, dignity, and self-esteem. The fellowship fund and its endowment have been built entirely by charitable donations from residents, families, and friends across the entire presbyterian living and westminster place organizations.

    $2,415,955 spentof which $2,415,955 as grants
    60% of program spending
  2. Geneva foundation supports presbyterian living and westminster place on special projects and programs as needed.

    $1,503,382 spentof which $1,503,382 as grants
    37% of program spending
  3. Geneva foundation provides presbyterian living and westminster place with capital grants to support capital improvements and additions that secure the safety, convenience and comfort of residents on all campuses.

    $124,121 spentof which $124,121 as grants
    3% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $4,043,458.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($8.1M) Expenses 100 ($12M) Net assets 100 ($146M)2018 Revenue 108 ($8.7M) Expenses 70 ($8.2M) Net assets 104 ($152M)2019 Revenue 152 ($12M) Expenses 50 ($5.8M) Net assets 106 ($155M)2020 Revenue 259 ($21M) Expenses 52 ($6.0M) Net assets 94 ($137M)2021 Revenue 112 ($9.1M) Expenses 71 ($8.3M) Net assets 118 ($173M)2022 Revenue 149 ($12M) Expenses 44 ($5.2M) Net assets 114 ($167M)2023 Revenue 171 ($14M) Expenses 44 ($5.1M) Net assets 107 ($156M)2024 Revenue 142 ($12M) Expenses 70 ($8.2M) Net assets 117 ($172M)2025 Revenue 111 ($9.0M) Expenses 43 ($5.1M) Net assets 123 ($179M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (111)Expenses (43)Net assets (123)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $138M to $173M (+25%).

$149M
$154M
$155M
$138M
$173M
$168M
$157M
$172M
$180M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

32% of GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (82% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,052 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$3.6M
’17
$552k
’18
$6.5M
’19
$15M
’20
$794k
’21
$6.8M
’22
$8.8M
’23
$3.4M
’24
$3.9M
’25
4.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Nadim Abi-Antoun

CEO

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed182119181919212222
Joined·+6+1+4+1+3+3+5+2
No longer listed·33503142
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $12k → $1.2M.

7 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 15% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 83% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

83%
largest funder
93%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 84% · 2018 82% · 2019 44% · 2020 29% · 2021 74% · 2022 97% · 2023 92% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

44% of GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES's grant income comes from Illinois funders.

IL
MD
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Illinois out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $548k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,504 philanthropy nonprofits its size.

Operating margin44% · top quartile
Months of reserve4.6mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,504 philanthropy nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Illinois

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 6%Fundraising 14%

Governance

16
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

IL

Part of a family of 2 related entities

  • Presbyterian Homes Dba Presbyterian Living · exempt
  • Westminster Place · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES?
GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES (Illinois) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,714,210 to it, the largest being THE GRAINGER FOUNDATION INC ($3,086,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES have?
IRS filings report 15 organizations giving $3,714,210 in grants to GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES?
THE GRAINGER FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $3,086,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GENEVA FOUNDATION OF PRESBYTERIAN HOMES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 15 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing