Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Leadingage Inc

The mission of leadingage is to be the trusted voice for aging.

$160k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$598kHuman Services$466kHealth$231kHousing & Shelter$193kScience & Tech$160kSocial Science$47kCommunity Improvement$40kReligion$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $149,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $159,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$13,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTMINSTER RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION INC$30,000
LEADINGAGE NEW YORK TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC$27,500
PCSC FOUNDATION$16,000
RIVERGATE HEALTH CARE CENTER$13,500
VALLEY VIEW CARE CENTER LLC$13,500
FOUNTAIN BLEU HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER INC$13,500
FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF THE INGHAM COUNTY MEDICAL CARE FACILITY$13,500
SUNNYSIDE PROPERTIES OF SARASOTA INC$12,000
SARASOTA-MANTEE JEWISH HOUSING COUNCIL INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $358k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARIZONA RETIREMENT CENTERS INC: $10k → 11%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY PRESCOTT VALLEY: $10k → 14%FLORENCE HOME HEALTHCARE CENTER: $10k → 12%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN MINISTRIES INC: $15k → 9%EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $8k → 14%BRAZOS TOWERS AT BAYOU MANOR: $30k → 16%SOUTH CAROLINA BAPTIST MINISTRIES FOR THE AGING INC: $20k → 18%CYPRESS COVE AT HEALTHPARK FLORIDA INC: $15k → 11%MENNONITE FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITIES INC: $10k → 15%VILLA ST FRANCIS INC: $10k → 17%SENIOR CITIZENS HOME ASSISTANCE SERVICE INC: $10k → 12%MAGNOLIA MANOR INC: $10k → 22%BAYLEY SENIOR CARE: $10k → 16%THE SELFHELP HOME INC: $15k → 14%THE GLEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM: $10k → 22%BROADWAY SERVICES INC: $10k → 23%RETIREMENT HOUSING FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%Brazos Towers at Bayou Manor: $27k → 16%SARASOTA-MANTEE JEWISH HOUSING COUNCIL INC: $10k → 9%UNITED LUTHERAN PROGRAM FOR THE AGING INC: $10k → 17%The Buckingham: $22k → 16%CAPITOL HILL VILLAGE: $15k → 14%THE SENIOR ALLIANCE INC: $10k → 21%HOLLY HALL: $20k → 16%THE METHODIST HOME OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: $9k → 14%KINGDOM CARE SENIOR VILLAGE INC: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$726k · 12 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
77

Total granted

$726k
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+13%

Still filing today

83%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2023 · $120k · revenue +114%
  • BP
    BRAZOS PRESBYTERIAN HOMES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $57k · revenue +47%
  • SA
    SEVEN ACRES JEWISH SENIOR CARE SERVICES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $57k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2018 · $70k
  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $60k
  • BF
    BARCLAY FRIENDS
    one grant, 2018 · $57k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
2
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
3
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
4
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
5
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
6
Ncr At Home Health and Wellness

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
7
Lutheran Home At Moorestown

Through the power of the holy spirit and in response to god's love as revealed in the gospel, the mission of lutheran social ministries of nj is to serve those who hurt, who are in need, or who have limited choices through an array of…

—
8
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
9
Christian Care Mesa Ii Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
10
Portage Trail Care Center Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

Health
11
National Church Residences At Home Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
12
Christian Care Mesa Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends House Retirement Community and the most unlike its peers is Mcfarlan Charitable Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%41%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/108
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,457

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/91
Grantees still filing
64/91
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LEADINGAGE NEW YORK TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC — $164,500 · OtherLEADINGAGE NEW YORK TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLCNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES FOUNDATION — $120,000 · OtherNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES FOUNDATIONVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF FLORIDA INC — $70,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF FLORIDA INCVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC — $60,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INCVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS — $46,796 · OtherMETHODIST RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES — $41,000 · OtherWESLEYAN HOMES INC — $32,500 · OtherLEADINGAGE NEW YORK INC — $37,500 · Other+28 more — $361,638 · Other+28 moreBRAZOS PRESBYTERIAN HOMES INC — $57,000 · Human ServicesBRAZOS PRESBYTERIAN …RETIREMENT HOUSING FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Human ServicesRETIREMENT HOUSING F…BUCKINGHAM SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY INC — $22,000 · Human ServicesBUCKINGHAM SENIOR LI…Holly Hall — $20,000 · Human ServicesHolly HallSCBMA — $20,000 · Human ServicesSCBMATHE SELFHELP HOME INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesCAPITOL HILL VILLAGE — $15,000 · Human ServicesSt John's Lutheran Ministries Inc — $15,000 · Human ServicesCYPRESS COVE AT HEALTHPARK FLORIDA INC — $15,000 · Human Services+16 more — $153,500 · Human Services+16 moreWESTMINSTER RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION INC — $56,000 · Housing & ShelterWESTMINSTER RETIR…BUCKNER RETIREMENT SERVICES INC — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterBUCKNER RETIREMEN…ELDERLY HOUSING DEV & OPERATIONS — $35,000 · Housing & ShelterELDERLY HOUSING D…NATIONAL LUTHERAN INC — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL LUTHERAN…SENIOR HOUSING OPTIONS INC — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterSENIOR HOUSING OP…HOLLENBECK PALMS — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterHOLLENBECK PALMSLUTHER TOWERS OF DOVER INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterLUTHER TOWERS OF …WEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterSPRINGVALE TERRACE INC — $12,500 · Housing & ShelterSUNNYSIDE PROPERTIES OF SARASOTA INC — $12,000 · Housing & Shelter+5 more — $44,000 · Housing & Shelter+5 moreBARCLAY FRIENDS — $57,000 · HealthBARCLAY FRIENDSSEVEN ACRES JEWISH SENIOR CARE SERVICES INC — $57,000 · HealthSEVEN ACRES JEW…ACTS COMMUNITIES OF MARYLAND INC FKA INTEGRACE INC — $32,418 · HealthACTS COMMUNITIE…FRIENDS HOUSE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY — $20,000 · HealthFRIENDS HOUSE R…FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF THE INGHAM COUNTY MEDICAL CARE FACILITY — $13,500 · HealthPARKER JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION — $11,250 · HealthSAINT JOSEPH'S LIVING CENTER INC — $10,000 · HealthTHE VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK — $10,000 · HealthPlantation Village Inc — $10,000 · HealthBENNETT COUNTY HOSPITAL AND NURSING HOME — $10,000 · HealthJEWISH HOME FOR THE ELDERLY OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $10,000 · HealthVISITING NURSE HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $10,000 · HealthBeth Sholom Home of Virginia — $10,000 · HealthBETHANY HOME OF RI INC — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $7,500 · HealthNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $50,000 · Science & TechNational Housing and Community Development Law Project — $20,000 · Crime & LegalPCSC FOUNDATION — $16,000 · Crime & LegalHELPAGE USA INC — $5,000 · Crime & LegalLEADINGAGE OHIO — $20,000 · Community ImprovementLUTHERAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES OF MARYLAND — $20,000 · Community Improvement
Other$933,934Human Services$357,500Housing & Shelter$319,500Health$278,668Science & Tech$50,000Crime & Legal$41,000Community Improvement$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES FOUNDATION — $120,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBARCLAY FRIENDS — $57,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRAZOS PRESBYTERIAN HOMES INC — $57,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSEVEN ACRES JEWISH SENIOR CARE SERVICES INC — $57,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWESTMINSTER RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION INC — $56,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBUCKNER RETIREMENT SERVICES INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEADINGAGE NEW YORK INC — $37,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetELDERLY HOUSING DEV & OPERATIONS — $35,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWESLEYAN HOMES INC — $32,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACTS COMMUNITIES OF MARYLAND INC FKA INTEGRACE INC — $32,418 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL LUTHERAN INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRETIREMENT HOUSING FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSENIOR HOUSING OPTIONS INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBUCKINGHAM SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY INC — $22,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSQLC SENIOR LIVING CENTER AT CORPUS CHRISTI INC — $22,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOLLENBECK PALMS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEADINGAGE OHIO — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHolly Hall — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES OF MARYLAND — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS HOUSE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCBMA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHER TOWERS OF DOVER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNational Housing and Community Development Law Project — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLAKEVIEW VILLAGE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPCSC FOUNDATION — $16,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SELFHELP HOME INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITOL HILL VILLAGE — $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSt John's Lutheran Ministries Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRADFORD ECUMENICAL HOME INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYPRESS COVE AT HEALTHPARK FLORIDA INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF THE INGHAM COUNTY MEDICAL CARE FACILITY — $13,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetST JOSEPH'S HOME — $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPRINGVALE TERRACE INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSUNNYSIDE PROPERTIES OF SARASOTA INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARKER JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION — $11,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY LIFE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLEY SENIOR CARE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S LIVING CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCoal County Extended Care Incorporated — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMennonite Friendship Communities Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVisiting Nurse Services of Newport and Bristol Counties Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSARASOTA-MANATEE JEWISH HOUSING COUNCIL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA RETIREMENT CENTERS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMagnolia Manor Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Council on A…AARP FoundationEnterprise Community …THDF II Inc DBA The H…The Harry and Jeanett…Nextfifty InitiativeMother Cabrini Health…AARPGe Aerospace Foundati…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…
National Council on Aging IncVA18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Council on Aging Inc · AARP Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Nextfifty Initiative · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · AARP · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Leadingage Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Jewish Home for the Elderly of Fairfield County Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Luther Towers of Dover Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home