· Public charity
Partnership With Native Americans
Serving immediate needs, supporting long-term solutions for strong, self-sufficient native american communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $45,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,700,331 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $9,655,331 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE ANIMAL CLINIC | $10,000 |
| BRO AND TRACY ANIMAL WELFARE | $10,000 |
| 12 HILLS DOG RESCUE | $10,000 |
| LAKE TRAVERSE ANIMAL REZCUE | $10,000 |
| TUBA CITY HUMANE SOCIETY INCORPORATED | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- 1H12 HILLS DOG RESCUE8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +116%
- DFDOUGHERTY FOUNDATION INC4× · 2019–2022 · $53k · revenue ×13
- LTLAKE TRAVERSE ANIMAL REZCUE5× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +489% · 36% of their budget
Funded once
- NDNALWOODI DENZHONE STRENGTH AND BEAUTY COMMUNITYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +31%
- PYPASCUA YAQUI TRIBE CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +139%
- CSCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To reduce the population of unwanted animals in the las cruces area.
Rescue and adopt out abandoned animals on navajo reservation
Please refer to schedule O
Saving animals from euthanasia, resulting in healthy pets being adopted.
Save animals in a county with no animal services
Animal rescue
Intake stray/sickly dogs from Navajo reservation, get them healthy, altered, vaccinated, manners, obedience, self-confidence, and find them great homes.
Animal Welfare
To provide a safety net for Kauai's homeless pets that cannot be assisted through existing Island Rescue efforts.
The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.
Animal search and rescue, vetting, rehome and placement of unwanted and abandoned pets, primarily in northern arizona.sponsors a foster pet program and overpopulation program of spay and neuter.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oglala Pet Project Goodman and the most unlike its peers is Dougherty Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds 12 HILLS DOG RESCUE ↗
- Who funds DOUGHERTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE TRAVERSE ANIMAL REZCUE ↗
- Who funds WOLF POINT POUND PUPPIES ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds BRO AND TRACY ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
- Who funds NALWOODI DENZHONE STRENGTH AND BEAUTY COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds TUBA CITY HUMANE SOCIETY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Midwestern University ↗
- Who funds MCKINLEY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY LAKE COUNTY AREA INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds TAILS OF LOVE RESCUE ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCAT ↗
- Who funds CONTINENTAL DIVIDE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds OYATE TECA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds OGLALA PET PROJECT GOODMAN ↗
- Who funds THE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOREAU GRAND ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ↗
- Who funds 4 LUV OF DOG RESCUE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Best Friends Animal Society · Humane World for Animals Inc · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Arizona Community Foundation · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Partnership With Native Americans funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.