Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tom Russell Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$440k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Education$1.4MHealth$526kHuman Services$499kYouth Development$243kHousing & Shelter$239kCommunity Improvement$178kFood & Nutrition$152kArts & Culture$73kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $91k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $198k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $152k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RISE SOUTHEAST RALEIGH CHARTER SCHOOL INC$102,000
DONKA INCORPORATED$50,000
HENDERSON COLLEGIATE$22,500
PS 70 MAX SCHOENFELD$20,000
PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS$20,000
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION$20,000
CHESS-IN-THE-SCHOOLS INC$17,500
THE COUNCIL OF URBAN PROFESSIONALS INSTITUTE$15,000
LATINO EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT PARTNERSHIP$15,000
PREP FOR PREP$13,500
COLORADO WOMENS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$12,000
A BETTER CHANCE INC$12,000
CRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$10,000
POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC$10,000
KIPP OKC PUBLIC SCHOOLS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $814k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $100k → 14%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $50k → 16%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $22k → 14%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $20k → 16%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $20k → 14%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10k → 16%HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC: $10k → 8%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $20k → 14%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $20k → 14%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $10k → 13%HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC: $5k → 8%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $15k → 14%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $8k → 14%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $10k → 13%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $100k → 8%HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC: $5k → 8%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $10k → 13%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $10k → 8%HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC: $5k → 8%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $5k → 13%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $10k → 8%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $8k → 8%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $7k → 8%GADS HILL CENTER: $5k → 14%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $5k → 8%GADS HILL CENTER: $5k → 14%GADS HILL CENTER: $5k → 14%GADS HILL CENTER: $5k → 14%SE RALEIGH PROMISE INC: $40k → 8%STEPUP DURHAM: $5k → 11%SE RALEIGH PROMISE INC: $38k → 8%SE RALEIGH PROMISE INC: $35k → 8%SE RALEIGH PROMISE INC: $25k → 8%SE RALEIGH PROMISE INC: $8k → 8%THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE TRIANG: $34k → 8%GROWING TOGETHER PRESCHOOL: $10k → 8%GROWING TOGETHER PRESCHOOL: $10k → 8%GROWING TOGETHER PRESCHOOL: $8k → 8%GROWING TOGETHER PRESCHOOL: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NC
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 48 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

48 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
23

Total granted

$3.2M
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+8%

Still filing today

90%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    RISE SOUTHEAST RALEIGH CHARTER SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $352k · revenue +30%
  • DI
    DONKA INCORPORATED
    6× · 2020–2025 · $302k · revenue +17%
  • ML
    MARCY LAB INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $203k · revenue ×13

Funded once

  • FRIENDS OF THE MOUNTAINS-TO-SEA TRAIL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +15%
  • Urban Ministries of Durham Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -9%
  • LO
    LEADERSHIP OKLAHOMA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
2
North Carolina Business Leaders for Educ

The mission of north carolina business leaders for education (dba best nc) is to unite an engaged and informed business perspective to dramatically transform and improve north carolina's education system. our goal is for every student to…

Education
3
Communities in Schools of North Carolina Inc

Cisnc's mission is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. cisnc serves as the backbone for its statewide network of 20 independent nonprofit organizations that serve local…

Human Services
4
The North Carolina Leadership Charter Academy Inc

The north carolina leadership academy provides its k-12 students with a solid foundation of skills, knowledge, and information as part of their college preparatory program. additionally, ncla seeks the acceptance of all high school…

Education
5
Institute for the Development of Young Leaders

Operation of a public charter school.

Membership Benefit
6
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
7
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
8
Kipp North Carolina

Support of member charter schools in north carolina

Education
9
College Summit Inc

College summit, inc. d/b/a peerforward (peerforward)'s mission is to unleash the power of positive peer influence to transform the lives of youth living in low-income communities by connecting them to college and careers. in low-income…

Education
10
Carolina Charter Academy

Operation of a public charter school.

Education
11
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thrive Scholars and the most unlike its peers is Porch-Hillsborough. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYmca Youth DevelopmentAffordable Housing Developm…Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Environmental Conservation …Women & Girls Leadership De…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…United Way AffiliatesYouth Mentoring ProgramsCancer Support ServicesYouth Development ServicesFood Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%18%5–10yr19%33%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/81
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,484

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/75
Grantees still filing
43/75
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RISE SOUTHEAST RALEIGH CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $352,000 · EducationRISE SOUTHEAST RALEIGH CHARTER SCHOOL …MARCY LAB INC — $203,000 · EducationMARCY LAB INCTHRIVE SCHOLARS — $117,000 · EducationTHRIVE SCHOLARSLatino Educational Achievement Partnership — $115,000 · EducationLatino Educational Achievement Partner…DUKE UNIVERSITY — $107,500 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYKIPP OKC PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $62,500 · EducationKIPP OKC PUBLIC SCHOOLS INCHENDERSON COLLEGIATE INC — $57,500 · EducationCOLORADO UPLIFT INC — $56,000 · Education+15 more — $82,500 · Education+15 morePartnership With Native Americans — $205,200 · Human ServicesPartnership With Native Ame…SE RALEIGH PROMISE INC — $145,500 · Human ServicesSE RALEIGH PROMISE INCINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $142,000 · Human ServicesINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLEYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY — $80,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC…The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) — $46,500 · Human ServicesThe Young Men's Christian A…GROWING TOGETHER PRESCHOOL — $39,500 · Human ServicesBRIDGES OF NORMAN INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesGADS HILL CENTER — $30,000 · Human ServicesJUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION — $30,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $30,000 · Human Services+2 more — $30,000 · Human ServicesDONKA INCORPORATED — $301,800 · OtherDONKA INCORPORATEDSOUTHEAST RALEIGH CHARTER FOUNDATION INC — $112,000 · OtherSOUTHEAST RALEIGH CHARTER …COLORADO WOMEN'S EDUCATION FOUNDATI — $54,000 · OtherCOLORADO WOMEN'S EDUCATION…CLEVELAND COUNTY FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $45,000 · OtherCLEVELAND COUNTY FAMILY YO…CRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $67,500 · OtherCRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUND…THE COUNCIL OF URBAN PROFESSIONALS INSTITUTE — $27,500 · Other+31 more — $201,000 · Other+31 moreErie Family Health Foundation Inc — $165,000 · HealthErie Family Health Center Inc — $38,000 · HealthCENTRAL OKLAHOMA AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $20,000 · HealthCHESS-IN-THE-SCHOOLS INC — $160,000 · Recreation & SportsDOROTHEA DIX PARK CONSERVANCY — $15,500 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $2,000 · Recreation & SportsPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $117,500 · Youth DevelopmentDURHAM CHILDREN'S INITIATIVE — $12,500 · Youth Development+1 more — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE LOTUS CAMPAIGN — $53,000 · Housing & ShelterThe Resurrection Project — $40,000 · Housing & Shelter
Education$1,153,000Human Services$813,700Other$808,800Health$223,000Recreation & Sports$177,500Youth Development$131,000Housing & Shelter$93,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRISE SOUTHEAST RALEIGH CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $352,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetDONKA INCORPORATED — $301,800 over 6y, 14% of budgetPartnership With Native Americans — $205,200 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMARCY LAB INC — $203,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetErie Family Health Foundation Inc — $165,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetCHESS-IN-THE-SCHOOLS INC — $160,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetSE RALEIGH PROMISE INC — $145,500 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $142,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $117,500 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetTHRIVE SCHOLARS — $117,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLatino Educational Achievement Partnership — $115,000 over 6y, 25% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $107,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY — $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $67,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKIPP OKC PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $62,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHENDERSON COLLEGIATE INC — $57,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO UPLIFT INC — $56,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCOLORADO WOMEN'S EDUCATION FOUNDATI — $54,000 over 4y, 37% of budgetTHE LOTUS CAMPAIGN — $53,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) — $46,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND COUNTY FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $45,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetThe Resurrection Project — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGROWING TOGETHER PRESCHOOL — $39,500 over 5y, 30% of budgetErie Family Health Center Inc — $38,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGES OF NORMAN INC — $35,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetGADS HILL CENTER — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION — $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE COUNCIL OF URBAN PROFESSIONALS INSTITUTE — $27,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRAL OKLAHOMA AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOROTHEA DIX PARK CONSERVANCY — $15,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPLM FAMILIES TOGETHER INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCovenant Christian School — $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetJUSTICE LOVE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetPREP FOR PREP — $13,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDURHAM CHILDREN'S INITIATIVE — $12,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MOUNTAINS-TO-SEA TRAIL — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUrban Ministries of Durham Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTUDENT U — $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLEELANAU CONSERVANCY — $8,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLEADERSHIP OKLAHOMA INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROOM TO READ — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARENT POSSIBLE — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetScissortail Productions Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPorch-Hillsborough — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Fo…Aj Fletcher FoundationUnited Way of the Gre…John Rex EndowmentDuke University Healt…Duke UniversityFidelity FoundationDuke Energy FoundationGipson Family Foundat…The Leon Levine Found…North Carolina Commun…The Mary Duke Biddle …
Triangle Community Foundation IncNC37.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Aj Fletcher Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · John Rex Endowment · Duke University Health System Inc · Duke University · Fidelity Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Gipson Family Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · The Mary Duke Biddle Foundation Missionpost Pmb #101

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tom Russell Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Newark Alliance Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Central Oklahoma American Indian Health Council Inc — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tom Russell Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Tom Russell Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines