· Public charity
Apla Health & Wellness
Apla health restores dignity and trust within underserved communities by providing world-class lgbtq+ empowering healthcare, hiv specialty care, food, housing and other essential support services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $110,999 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,310,856 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,199,857 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AIDS UNITED | $63,287 |
| BEING ALIVEPEOPLE WITH AIDS ACTION COALITION INC | $19,190 |
| PROJECT ANGEL FOOD | $13,257 |
| SAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SABAN COMMUNITY CLINIC | $5,265 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PAPROJECT ANGEL FOOD7× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +273%
- BABEING ALIVE PEOPLE WITH AIDS ACTION COAL6× · 2019–2025 · $102k · revenue +183%
- CFCounsel for Justice5× · 2019–2023 · $37k · revenue +113%
Funded once
- HRHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INCone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +0%
- TTTHRIVE TRIBE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue -100%
- NINAESM INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aids project of the east bay (apeb) is focused on the prevention of the spread of hiv and supports individuals living with the virus through programs targeted at some of the most vulnerable and marginalized individuals. apeb seeks to…
To promote health, well-being, and social justice for those living with HIV, LGBTQ+ individuals, and communities marginalized by society.
Our mission is to achieve health care equity and promote well-being for the lgbt and other underserved communities and people living with and affected by hiv.
Aid for aids international, inc. (afa)is committed to improve the quality of life of people living with hiv/aids (plwhas)in developing countries and who are immigrants to the united states of america. we work to empower plwhas, their…
Treatment action group (tag) is an independent, activist, and community-based research and policy think tank committed to racial, gender, and lgbtq+ equity; social justice; and liberation, fighting to end hiv, tuberculosis (tb), and…
Apla health restores dignity and trust within underserved communities by providing world-class lgbtq+ empowering healthcare, hiv specialty care, food, housing and other essential support services.
Our mission is to advance and protect the rights, dignity, and health of people living with hiv/aids in the bay area. continued on schedule owe accomplish this through direct legal representation by one of our staff attorneys, by careful…
Vision: vivent health envisions an end to the hiv/aids epidemic.mission: to end hiv/aids by providing integratred, personalzied, judgment-free healthcare, social services, and effective prevention strategies.
Supporting individuals living with hiv/aids and preventing new hiv infections.
Minority AIDS Projects mission is to ensure community based access to respectful and efficient health promotion and disease prevention services through the provision of critical support that works to bridge the gap of services for our…
The mission of legacy community health services is, "driving healthy change in our communities." our vision is, "connecting our communities to health every day, in every way."
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Aids Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Thrive Tribe Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AIDS UNITED ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
- Who funds BEING ALIVE PEOPLE WITH AIDS ACTION COAL ↗
- Who funds THE ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OUTFEST ↗
- Who funds Counsel for Justice ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC ↗
- Who funds THRIVE TRIBE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE LIFE GROUP LA INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NAESM INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: AIDS Project Los Angeles · The Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Apla Health & Wellness funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.