Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Outdoor Alliance

Our mission is to unite the voices of outdoor enthusiasts to protect the humanpowered outdoor recreation experience and conserve Americas public lands.

$90k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
5
Itemized grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
29%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$78k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$9,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$50,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 10
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$1.3M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 29% of the organizations Outdoor Alliance funded were first-time grantees, receiving 11% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving5$78k0%
FY20247$91k29%
FY20237$127k14%
FY20226$130k17%
FY20216$115k17%
FY202010$123k50%
FY20193$52k33%
FY20183$41k67%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$733kRecreation & Sports$51kEmployment$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 15 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Outdoor Alliance supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Mountaineers: $268,961 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Whitewater: $167,150 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetWinter Wildlands Alliance Inc: $107,671 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetThe Access Fund: $86,400 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetThe Surfrider Foundation: $48,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Mountain Bicycling Association: $27,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEvergreen Mountain Bike Alliance: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMountain Bike the Tetons Inc: $13,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetThe American Alpine Club: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Colorado Mountain Club: $10,580 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWashington Trails Association: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCorba-Concerned Off-Road Bicyclists: $9,350 over 2y, 15% of budgetCultivate Ability: $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetWashington Climbers Coalition: $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetMountainTrue: $3,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgCA19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · Clif Family Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Wilderness Society · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Outdoor Alliance with peer funders

About Outdoor Alliance

How much does Outdoor Alliance give?
Outdoor Alliance reported 5 itemized grants totaling $78,000, out of $90,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 10 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Outdoor Alliance fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (93%), Recreation & Sports (6%), Employment (1%).
Who are Outdoor Alliance's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The Mountaineers ($269k), American Whitewater ($167k), Winter Wildlands Alliance Inc ($108k).
Does Outdoor Alliance fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 29% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Outdoor Alliance?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Patagoniaorg, Clif Family Foundation, The Denver Foundation.
Where is Outdoor Alliance based?
Outdoor Alliance is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Outdoor Alliance’s filings →

More from the funding graph