Skip to content

Florida · Private foundation

Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$878k
Granted FY2021
15
Grants FY2021
14
Organizations funded FY2021
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

92% of Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Boston Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157 named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $878k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’21
0
’22
0
’23
25
’24
4
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$9,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$427,812
States reached, FY2021
10
Total assets, FY2021
$12M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
95% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.9MEnvironment$411kCommunity Improvement$350kPublic Benefit$160kScience & Tech$125kEducation$115kHealth$105kCivil Rights$100kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
ID
MT
NY
MA
OR
WY
PA
CA
CO
MD
DC
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 31 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 39 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.4M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157 supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNational Geographic Society: $55,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProctor Academy: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCity Kids to Wilderness Project Inc: $45,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAdventurers and Scientists for Conservation: $35,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWild Salmon Center: $34,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJackson Hole Conservation Alliance: $30,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetNational Park Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAfrican Wildlife Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Rivers Inc: $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetColor of Changeorg Education Fund: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Federation of America Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Andrew Goodman Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFractured Atlas Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMaternity Care Coalition: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Alpine Club: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOutdoor Alliance: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFriends of Katahdin Woods & Waters: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAkashinga Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetReproductive Freedom for All Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen for Women International: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlue Hill Public Library: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWinter Wildlands Alliance Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNational Marine Sanctuary Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOceanic Society Expeditions: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Acadia: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Upper Delaware River Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEarthjustice: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTree of Life Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 28.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgCA21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Seattle Foundation · The Wilderness Society · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · The New York Community Trust · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Marin Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157 with peer funders

About Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157

How much does Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157 give?
Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157 reported 15 grants totaling $878,312 in its FY2021 IRS filing.
What does Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (41%), Environment (9%), Community Improvement (8%).
Who are Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: Voteorg ($140k), National Geographic Society ($55k), Proctor Academy ($50k).
Does Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157 accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Patagoniaorg, Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc, Seattle Foundation.
Where is Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157 based?
Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157 is based in FL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157’s filings →

More from the funding graph