· Private foundation
633 Immi Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k91 grants · $325k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $116k
- $250k+1 grant · $313k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CRU | $312,900 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $36,000 |
| Josiah Venture | $20,750 |
| Global Service Network | $19,200 |
| BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION | $16,000 |
| One Mission Society | $13,400 |
| YOUTH FOR CHRIST | $10,200 |
| FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES | $9,000 |
| WORLD SPORTS INC | $8,000 |
| STUDENT IMPACT MINISTRY WESTFIELD | $8,000 |
| MISSION TO UKRAINE | $7,200 |
| INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP | $7,000 |
| NEW SONG MISSION INC | $6,800 |
| YOUTH FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL | $6,500 |
| LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES INC | $6,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
Supporing missionaries worldwide
Religious
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
Religious
Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...
Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Eurasia and the most unlike its peers is Convencion Bautista Hispana De Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds Josiah Venture ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Youth For Christ Inc ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds WORLD SPORTS INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION TO UKRAINE INC ↗
- Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
- Who funds NEW SONG MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds TWO EIGHT MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Mephibosheth Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds Third Phase Christian Center ↗
- Who funds THE O'CONNOR HOUSE ↗
- Who funds DADCAMP INC ↗
- Who funds Shepherd Community Inc ↗
- Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
- Who funds GRIT INTO GRACE INC ↗
- Who funds INDIA RURAL EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds BILL GLASS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds INDIANA FAMILY INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds HEART OF AFRICIA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Word & Deed Foundation of IMMI Inc · Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Tyndale House Ministries · The Bolick Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Gordon Christian Trust · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization 633 Immi Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.